Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 18,080
- Points
- 1,260
Here is the GoC's evolving position as explained by National Post:
![]()
Carney says he supports U.S. strikes on Iran 'with regret,' as Liberal divisions emerge
Carney supports U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran "with regret," because the conflict represents a "failure of the international order."nationalpost.com
Convening remains the go-to solution for Canada, which apparently hasn't worked for 47 years but heck lets keep trying....
Can someone explain support with regret for me ?
A broken clock is right twice a day.
The Yanks didn’t bother to build an international coalition for this op, or justify their action to their allies. When they’re left in the lurch and the cities become targets, people tend to get a little pissed.
The mullahs are in survival mode. They aren’t going to hunker down like in other strikes.
The US has never needed an international coalition. They can project and sustain by themselves.
I doubt they had any clue they were under attack....and it smashed the entire stern of the ship - engineering spaces would have flooded quickly in addition to the compartments that were utterly destroyed in the initial explosion....the bow looked relatively undamaged, but that ship is dead and gone. Wow.
That is defiantly a dead ship.
Below is a link to the video on Twitter for anyone who doesn't want to open it up on Instagram.
This one actually bothers me. From my (admittedly limited) experience working in that area of the world and researching/studying/learning about the different parts of the Iranian military, what I understood was that the Iranian Navy is one of the least dogmatic/fanatical of the services. That mantel belongs to the IRGCN. The IRN are primarily national in their perspective, wanting to serve the country and it's people, not the Supreme Leader. This vessel was hundreds of miles away from the combat area and posed no threat to US forces while it was off the coast of Sir Lanka. They should have been afforded the opportunity to put into a neutral port and tie-up for the duration of the "war" or scuttle their ship if need be. Instead, reports indicate that over 100 sailors are now dead, and I don't think that was necessary.
Or maybe I just have a soft spot for sailors, regardless of their nation.
I see the Belgrano-esq hand wringing has begun.
So I guess an IRGC team can attack a USN vessel (anywhere) and that’s fair game.
Seems fair to me. Isn't that how a war works ?
If that Iranian ship wasn't steaming like it was already in a fight that just shows a complete lack of situational awareness.
Last edited:
