If legit, interesting (minor) indicator of population sentiment.
Southern Iran is the spiritual home of the Islamic Republic.

If legit, interesting (minor) indicator of population sentiment.
Where's the folks that said the American public would rally to this?
I think higher support would have been possible with a more competent plan.
Afghan saying "they have watches and we have the time"The same way the U.S. and it's partners dominated in Vietnam
The Taliban, frankly, waited out the end game.
And they might be mistaken or overwrought or just trying to make their problems the US's problems. As I've written, the US and Israel have (probably only temporarily) eased their "Iran problems". Now some other people have "Iran problems" of their own. Perhaps they will come around to the view that everyone should work together to solve everyone's "Iran problem". Anyone who understands the idea of letting something break in order to get it fixed can see what's going on, regardless that it was not likely done consciously.Let's recap. 5 weeks, $50B spent, and a dozen casualties. To give Iran control of the Strait. And that's exactly how the rest of the world, notably people and governments in the region see this.
Each party defines its own victory conditions. Outsiders don't get to impose conditions; they could join in and set their own for themselves. The conditions need not be mutually exclusive. I wrote earlier that neither side really "wins", but consider a contrary view: Iran defines regime survival as its war aim; the US and Israel define destruction of Iran's air/navy/missile/nuclear capabilities (and for Israel, selected members of the government and military leadership) to some arbitrary thresholds as their war aims. Each party's aims are achievable without denying the others', and, as given, will probably all be reasonably achieved.The administration can define whatever criteria they want. If the war leaves everybody else worse off, those other parties will not see it as success. And that's aside from the difference between tactical and strategic victory.
The US eventually got bin Laden. They didn't democratize Afghanistan, and eventually ceded the country back to the Taliban. I'd say the juice wasn't worth the squeeze, so "no". Good example, though. Proves that a deliberate diplomatic and military work-up by competent people working in systematically built coalitions is no assurance of preventing outcomes orders of magnitude worse than a spontaneous few weeks' war by incompetents. Libya is another example of what sober serious competent coalitions can do; the country's still a mess. Apparently really good strategic thinking is hard and all the best minds are somewhere else - probably criticizing on the internet.Question. Do you think the US and NATO won in Afghanistan?
Let’s maybe wait to learn the fate of the crew before too directly and blatantly politicizing this. With nothing heard from CENTCOM on the pilot and WSO, right now we have an active CSAR, or next of kin notifications, or crew recovered but maybe in rough medical shape, or some combination thereof, with a lot of further people still at high risk if the CSAR crews are still over land. Lots of time for ‘gotchas’ later.Remember when Trump said people who go into the military are "suckers and losers" or that John McCain was no hero because he got shot down?
How's that hitting now?
Let’s maybe wait to learn the fate of the crew before too directly and blatantly politicizing this. With nothing heard from CENTCOM on the pilot and WSO, right now we have an active CSAR, or next of kin notifications, or crew recovered but maybe in rough medical shape, or some combination thereof, with a lot of further people still at high risk if the CSAR crews are still over land. Lots of time for ‘gotchas’ later.
Cool. I stand by what I said, just as a respect thing right now.This is not "gotcha". Those comments hit particularly hard when you think of the airmen fighting for their lives right now.
The reason they went in without a real plan is because lives are disposable to them.
Each party defines its own victory conditions. Outsiders don't get to impose conditions; they could join in and set their own for themselves. The conditions need not be mutually exclusive. I wrote earlier that neither side really "wins", but consider a contrary view: Iran defines regime survival as its war aim; the US and Israel define destruction of Iran's air/navy/missile/nuclear capabilities (and for Israel, selected members of the government and military leadership) to some arbitrary thresholds as their war aims. Each party's aims are achievable without denying the others', and, as given, will probably all be reasonably achieved.
Cool. I stand by what I said, just as a respect thing right now.
Vietnam demonstrates that a long war with interruptions is really just one war with a clear initiator.The same way the U.S. and it's partners dominated in Vietnam
I've already written in effect that "regime change" was unrealistic irrespective of what Trump says, and also that it's plausibly a "stretch" aim, not a "core" aim. I've repeatedly written that I don't pay much attention to what Trump says and that he is too self-contradictory to make much sense of what he says. There's a camp of people who pick and choose from Trump's blatherings as if they know which ones ought to be taken seriously, but I'm not in it. I don't expect you to read everything I write, so your error is understandable.I want to say you're making it up as you go, like he is. I think it's actually worse. You just regurgitate.
Vietnam demonstrates that a long war with interruptions is really just one war with a clear initiator.
There seem to be basically 3 CoAs for dealing with aggressive nations: put up with their trouble-making (hard on the targets, easy to endure for those not in the lines of fire); occasionally smack the troublemaker down; occupy it as long as it takes.
An Israeli reporter with N12 is reporting a ‘western source’ says one crew member rescued. Tough to put much weight to this one way or another.
Reportedly F-15 shot down over Iran.
CSAR PR ops underway.
Any reports of the downed F15 crew stealing an F14 and escaping?Fair. Makes he angry to think of what that crew is going through. And for what?
Yeah I missed the updates (stupid phone) until I posted.FYI...
US F-15E jet confirmed shot down over Iran as Tehran releases wreckage images
Downing of fighter plane – the first shot down over Iran since start of war – prompts frantic US rescue effort
![]()
US F-15E jet confirmed shot down over Iran as Tehran releases wreckage images
Downing of fighter plane – the first shot down over Iran since start of war – prompts frantic US rescue effortwww.theguardian.com