Is it time to list ANTIFA as a criminal or terrorist organization?

[Altair]

Juno News. formerly True North…

Is it just me, or is there a correlation between the level of anger there is at the government and those who watch rage bate slop like True North, Juno news, Northern perspective, rebel news...

 

[ArmyRick]

Is it just me, or is there a correlation between the level of anger there is at the government and those who watch rage bate slop like True North, Juno news, Northern perspective, rebel news...

Its just you.

 

[OldSolduer]

Its just you.

Facing facts and the truth are not his strong suit.

 

[Altair]

Facing facts and the truth are not his strong suit.

Your ad hominens only make me stronger.

 

[Brad Sallows]

rage bate

Epic spellcheck failure.

 

[Brad Sallows]

It doesn't matter if "antifa" is an organization, or a movement, or a mantle some choose to claim.

Violence without a political nexus is criminal.

Some violence with a political nexus is criminal. Some is terrorist.

Allow them - allow anyone - to express themselves freely so there will be no doubt who and where they are. Anyone else is free to expose and shun them.

 

[The Bread Guy]

Is it just me, or is there a correlation between the level of anger there is at the government and those who watch rage bate slop like True North, Juno news, Northern perspective, rebel news...

To be scrupulously fair, some would say there’s more than zero correlation between unquestioning hatred of, say, all things American and those who take in, and share the rage bait of, mostly the other end of the political commentary spectrum? Given that …

Facing facts and the truth are not his strong suit.

All information has some facts, but loadsa outlets on all sides 1) triage facts that aren’t convenient or 2) throw isolated facts out there without background or context to show what the facts mean. I won’t go si far as saying there’s always an “absolute” truth because I find the more granular detail I learn about some things, the more “yeah, but .,.” I get.

 

[brihard]

Epic spellcheck failure.

This reply in conjunction with the one you quoted is probably the funniest thing you’ve ever posted.

 

[Kirkhill]

To be scrupulously fair, some would say there’s more than zero correlation between unquestioning hatred of, say, all things American and those who take in, and share the rage bait of, mostly the other end of the political commentary spectrum? Given that …

All information has some facts, but loadsa outlets on all sides 1) triage facts that aren’t convenient or 2) throw isolated facts out there without background or context to show what the facts mean. I won’t go si far as saying there’s always an “absolute” truth because I find the more granular detail I learn about some things, the more “yeah, but .,.” I get.

They really should spend more time teaching debating in High School.

Two teams.
Two people a side.
Randomly selected subjects.
Randomly selected side. You may be required to argue against a position in which you strongly believe.

Pro side presents evidence that suits its case.
Anti side presents contrary evidence.
Pro side refutes anti side.
Anti side refutes pro side.

Class or panel decides a winner.

Next team up.

In a week's time you can find yourself arguing the same topic from the opposite side.

....

There is no need for both sides to agree on facts.
The object is not to persuade the other team.
The object is to persuade the audience.
The argument informs the audience.