• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Lead, Follow or Get Out of The Way

ruxted

Member
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
210
Lead, Follow or Get Out of The Way!

Prime Minister Harper's 'new' government seems mildly schizophrenic: one part, the cabinet, has 'done the right things' and has 'done things right' with regard to rebuilding our armed forces; another part, led by the PMO, has failed to enunciate policies which justify that rebuilding to Canadians.

Prime Minister Harper has stated that he is putting Canada back on course to return to being a leader of the middle powers: a respected member of the international community that practices the responsibilities about which it preaches. The Ruxted Group commends him for this. We believe most Canadian soldiers are ready to pay the high price their country demands of them. The cabinet has put our money where the Conservative Party's mouth is: the budget has grown, new people are pouring into the recruiting centres and basic training units, new equipment is arriving and entering service, more plans for transformation and growth are being announced. BZ!

Prime Minister Harper and his ministers, even Defence Minister O'Connor upon whom an unfairly heavy and ill-considered communications burden has fallen, continue to fail to explain to Canadians that:

1. There are good reasons – consistent with Canadians' values – to be in Afghanistan, fighting, now and beyond 2009;

2. We can win the war in Afghanistan, if we clearly, properly and realistically define 'victory;' and

3. We are making a difference, right now, in ways which should make Canadians' hearts swell with pride.

Recently, André Pratte of La Presse, in an editorial, which can be found in English here, makes an important  point which Ruxted feels obliged to accentuate and support. Prime Minister Harper, Pratte suggests, is turning Canada away from being a leader and towards being a “back seat driver.” That would be a return to the failed policies of former Prime Ministers Trudeau and Chrétien, when Canada sat on the sidelines, hectoring its friends and allies while remaining silent about the misdeeds of others.

Ruxted is convinced that Canadians want better. Canadians may be ill informed thanks to a veritable barrage of misinformation thrown at them by too many politicians and journalists and by some academics and 'activists' with political agendas that are suspect, to say the least. Misinformation, often copied from the press releases of opposition politicians or so-called 'activists,' creates doubt and confusion. Doubt and confusion breed fear. Fear is infectious. Fear, false fear, false fear created by Canada's enemies, is infecting Canada now.  The government has a duty to join with the Canadian Forces and, as the recruiting advertisement says, “Fight Fear!” The government can fight fear by telling Canadian the clear, simple and palatable truth:

1.  We are in Afghanistan for a mix of good reasons, including to protect our own vital, security interests and to exercise our international responsibility to protect the women and children of Afghanistan who will be enslaved if the Taliban prevails;

2.We are not in Afghanistan for oil or President Bush and those who say otherwise lie; and

3.We are helping the Afghan people – we are doing more, much more than killing and dying on Afghanistan's plains.

The Ruxted Group is appalled that the government remains unwilling or unable to explain itself.

Afghanistan is an issue on which the Conservative government is clearly and distinctly different from the opposition parties. Rather than highlight that issue and build support for the government's stated position, Prime Minister Harper appears intent on running in circles, à la M. Dion, looking for a place to hide. That may be good politics. Perhaps Canadians cannot be led to reason on this issue; perhaps their fears (and a few other unattractive national attributes) are too deeply ingrained.  It is a worthy issue. The government's position has been 'right' for most of the past year; the opposition has adopted and espouses unworthy principles and positions. This ought to be a winner for the Conservative party.  It should allow Mr. Harper to demonstrate principled leadership.

As we have said before, "Lead, follow or get out of the way." The clock is ticking, and the people, through elections, will make that choice if the government does not show leadership on this issue.
 
Like the tone, but the content is not as intellectually strong as some of Ruxted's previous releases...
 
Right back at ya, Ruxted.

In a perfect world, the government is a great propaganda machine, but this government is less than ideal, in some part due to their own failures and in some part due to the tired old men of state-media, state-subsidised-media, and state-licensed-monopoly-profit-media, all of whom have a natural allegiance to the socialists and left-wing liberals who pay their salaries and bonuses.

But the right or wrong of this mission is not a propaganda issue -- it is a right or wrong issue, and that argument can be explained by anyone understanding that issue, not just government ministers. 

Those us of who understand and agree, need to speak, not just pout on the sidelines than Harper/MacKay/O'Connor is no Winston Churchill. 

Agreed, but that is not reason to give up, but rather to re-double your efforts, as Ruxted has certainly done, but the target should be Taliban-Jack and the Pencil-Neck-Dion, not Harper and the gang.


 
I fully and entirely agree with building our own defense system, so we are less British and Russian Dependant. However, the way Harper is conducting himself it sounds as if he is planning to be doing much more than defending our country. The sudden turn from peace keeping core country, to becoming offensively able bodied, is a large transition, one that, one would would think to take longer than even Harper's term in office. As we progress we must make sure as not to pose as an upcoming threat to opposing terrorist nations and the likes. The recent and ongoing accusations that "Terrorists are, or will cross from Canada into the United States" is not a mild accusation and should be "nipped in the butt" asap. My personal belief is that the Bush administration is more or less not impressed with Canada's efforts, or lack there of, with the War On Iraq. Such accusations make it a mandatory reason for having United States military border patrols. Harper is playing with fire in retaliating to such accusations with the idea of making Canada more militarily equipped. In one sentence, Harper is power tripping!

Signed: Kyle, Future Combatant for the Canadian Armed Forces
 
Ummm, what?  About the only things we depend on Russia and Britain for are Smirnoff vodka, and decent soccer on Saturday mornings.  Could you maybe put your thoughts in a more coherent format, please?  You're kinda all over the map here.
 
DualCore said:
Agreed, but that is not reason to give up, but rather to re-double your efforts, as Ruxted has certainly done, but the target should be Taliban-Jack and the Pencil-Neck-Dion, not Harper and the gang.
A suggestion...
If ya have something to say about someone - say it.  Leave the name calling to the children in the school yard.
Name calling diminishes the message you're attempting to formulate & deliver.
 
Teentrooper said:
The sudden turn from peace keeping core country, to becoming offensively able bodied, is a large transition,
You're confused. Do some reading: http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/64699.0.html
 
geo said:
A suggestion...
If ya have something to say about someone - say it.  Leave the name calling to the children in the school yard.
Name calling diminishes the message you're attempting to formulate & deliver.

There are numerous other members doing the same thing.  Dual Core may be only following their lead...
 
Teentrooper said:
I fully and entirely agree with building our own defense system, so we are less British and Russian Dependant.

Semi-Ditto with Kat - I can see how some might perceive us as having some 'British dependent' actions (i.e. ties to the monarchy), but I dont see as how we are 'Russian dependent' other than an affection for vodka...
 
Teentrooper said:
"nipped in the butt"

Signed: Kyle, Future Combatant for the Canadian Armed Forces
Kyle,

Just a small note, in no way diminishing what others have mentioned to you, I believe the phrase you were looking for was "nipped in the bud".  It's a gardening/farming reference that has nothing to do with anatomy.

And yeah, some more research would be a good thing for ya!  ;)
 
xena said:
Kyle,
Just a small note, in no way diminishing what others have mentioned to you, I believe the phrase you were looking for was "nipped in the bud".  It's a gardening/farming reference that has nothing to do with anatomy.
And yeah, some more research would be a good thing for ya!   ;)

I liked the term "nipped in the butt"
much better allusion VS gardening term
 
Back
Top