- Reaction score
- 1,732
- Points
- 1,160
My understanding is to vote for a Liberal leadership candidate is that you must have lived in Canada for the last 183 days. Has Carney?
LPC leadership race - 2025
- Thread starter dimsum
- Start date
MilEME09
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,391
- Points
- 1,210
Given he was doing economic advisement during and after covid before coming onto the liberal economic Council, I'd say it's a good bet
ArmyRick
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,959
- Points
- 1,010
And he can't do that from New York or London (Not Ontario)?
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 13,223
- Points
- 1,260
Ill have it on.
RangerRay
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,617
- Points
- 1,260
I have to wash my (non-existent) hair.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 35,644
- Points
- 1,160
Four non-francophones vying to be the next leader of a bilingual country, in public and on TV, under lot of pressure?
RangerRay
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,617
- Points
- 1,260
I find French debates painful to listen to to begin with. It’s worse when the candidates speak as well as I do.Four non-francophones vying to be the next leader of a bilingual country, in public and on TV, under lot of pressure?
Mind you, I find all debates painful.
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 13,223
- Points
- 1,260
I tried to watch it. But family and life kept me occupied, and when I did manage to tune in there was no sound...
I watched it.
If I were to rate their French in order:
Baylis, Gould, Freeland and Carney.
They clearly weren’t out to attack each other and did a good job of staying disciplined in that regard.
Focus seemed to be on how to tackle the Trump issue.
No one messed up. Baylis impressed me with some of his policy ideas.
If I were to pick any winners i would say Baylis and Gould because they probably managed to raise their profiles a bit.
If I were to rate their French in order:
Baylis, Gould, Freeland and Carney.
They clearly weren’t out to attack each other and did a good job of staying disciplined in that regard.
Focus seemed to be on how to tackle the Trump issue.
No one messed up. Baylis impressed me with some of his policy ideas.
If I were to pick any winners i would say Baylis and Gould because they probably managed to raise their profiles a bit.
Jarnhamar
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 8,112
- Points
- 1,160
Carney mistakenly says 'we agree with Hamas' in French Liberal leadership debate
Luckily Freeland jumped in and rescued him.
Otherwise it sounds like the "debate" was a four-way circle jerk.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 35,644
- Points
- 1,160
Because they've all been selected and conditioned to be 'Yes Men/Women' by the Trudeau machine, which wants no leaders apart from the 'Supreme Leader'.
None of them are national leadership material IMHO and they'd likely be crushed in contact with real politicians like Trump, or even our own provincial Premiers.
As Patton once said "When everyone thinks alike, no one is thinking."
