- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
I have a problem that I desperately need solved. Please help!
The Background
The CO of our regiment has recently come into power and it is evident to most all ranks, that his priority is making himself and "his" regiment look good; he does as he pleases.
The Problem
-This CO has decided to move the SR NCO & OFFICER's mess from its current location and take over one of the rooms from the current JR's mess. (they are taking our largest room, we are now forced to move to the smaller one). The reason for this is that the SR's mess does not make a profit and they have moved to share the success of the JR's mess.
-In addition, the CO has decreed that effective Dec 1, whatever funds the JR's mess has not spent will be amalgamated into the new "joint" bank account between the two messes.
-The CO held a meeting with the JR's mess where he asked for suggestions and opinions and said (I am not kidding about this one) "It really doesn't matter what you have to say though, I'm going to do what I want."
-The CO has also made it clear that if he does not like what the JR's mess decides to spend their money on, he will veto the decision and spend it as he believes it should be spent.
My question is this:
-Is there a document or resource which sets out how messes are to be run? (other than QR&O 27.01)
-Does the CO have the authority to do what he chooses to the JR's mess?
-Is there anything a PMC can do to "dig in our heels" and oppose him?
-In a combined mess, are purchases/decisions still up for vote in a mess meeting or does the CO have authority to veto anything and impose his decision?
This is not an attempt at whining. If this is truly permitted and common practice then so be it. I simply have the feeling it's not.
Any suggestions or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated.
The Background
The CO of our regiment has recently come into power and it is evident to most all ranks, that his priority is making himself and "his" regiment look good; he does as he pleases.
The Problem
-This CO has decided to move the SR NCO & OFFICER's mess from its current location and take over one of the rooms from the current JR's mess. (they are taking our largest room, we are now forced to move to the smaller one). The reason for this is that the SR's mess does not make a profit and they have moved to share the success of the JR's mess.
-In addition, the CO has decreed that effective Dec 1, whatever funds the JR's mess has not spent will be amalgamated into the new "joint" bank account between the two messes.
-The CO held a meeting with the JR's mess where he asked for suggestions and opinions and said (I am not kidding about this one) "It really doesn't matter what you have to say though, I'm going to do what I want."
-The CO has also made it clear that if he does not like what the JR's mess decides to spend their money on, he will veto the decision and spend it as he believes it should be spent.
My question is this:
-Is there a document or resource which sets out how messes are to be run? (other than QR&O 27.01)
-Does the CO have the authority to do what he chooses to the JR's mess?
-Is there anything a PMC can do to "dig in our heels" and oppose him?
-In a combined mess, are purchases/decisions still up for vote in a mess meeting or does the CO have authority to veto anything and impose his decision?
This is not an attempt at whining. If this is truly permitted and common practice then so be it. I simply have the feeling it's not.
Any suggestions or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated.