- Reaction score
- 9,809
- Points
- 1,160
Remius said:well aware. My point is that there is the expectation. Hell, they even include that as a fail safe in their planning at times.
Doesn't the C in a paCe plan stand for Cell phone? ;D
Remius said:well aware. My point is that there is the expectation. Hell, they even include that as a fail safe in their planning at times.
dapaterson said:The Army built a bridge at Trouty?
SupersonicMax said:Just don't use your phone in the field if you don't want.
Oldgateboatdriver said:What! You never heard of the Bridge on the River Trout? ;D
Remius said:The best is when they expect you to use your cell phone on ex because comms goes down.
Not a Sig Op said:No me ol' trout... Trout River is on the west coast... the bridge was in Trouty.
Oldgateboatdriver said:But I jest: I was just trying to make a play on words with "the Bridge on the River Kwai" and Trouty has two syllables instead of just one, so I cut it down to one. In fact, at Trouty, it's not even a river. The bridge is over a narrow arm of the Atlantic ocean that comes inland from the coast by about 600 meters before spreading out into a small pond-shaped basin. That pond shaped area was well protected from the sea, so that's where the fishermen of the inshore fisheries kept their dories in the old days. The town like many in NL just grew up around that protected basin.
They should be, as should be Sat Phones. Heck we used to roll out Line Dets back when I first joined (which still should happen). The comms situation is laughable with radios, trucks and personel. It's not really a surprise that people are leaving, "make it work" can only go on for so long.Remius said:This isn't about a text or two. It's about using our cell phones as 522's on exercise. This rarely happens at the unit level but I've seen it on large concentrations or collective exercises. If cell phones are the back up then issue them.
Not a Sig Op said:This is still a problem.
The military has developed an over reliance on cell phones, that will bite them.
It is and already should be a "lesson learned", but folks refuse to learn it.
donaldk said:Someone as NAVRESHQ forgot that memo and also the MCS userguide - the amount of reports my RSS staff get requested for the same thing (slightly different wording) is absolutely gut-wrenching due to the hours wasted - whereas they honestly could just enforce proper data entry and have scheduled pulls from MCSC and MITE. GBA+, EE, and that ******* failure of OPHTAS (reverted to using the old Excel sheet for now) alone have consumed roughly 100 man-hours in troubleshooting/query setup/emails. OPHTAS reporting system - well LOL to the misery that crap show is. Another little annoyance was the repetitive OPQs because some honourable person had a spaz fit crap fest over Uber being used for official travel (i.e. TD); P.S. My unit actually has banned the use of shared economy travel services while on TD thanks to these OPQs :tsktsk:
As for emailing Class As, very rarely is anything I do with Class As time sensitive unless it involves travel arrangements (or a couple HARD to get PERs... those ****ers are going "UNABLE TO SIGN" 15 May). For the RSS Adjts/AdminOs on here - get access be it yourself or delegated to the big data systems (HRMS-MITE/Monitor-MASS/MCS CFTPO/MCS CFRIMS/DRMIS - FI and MA&S (your MRP)/WebSCPS V2) and make sure the data input is correct. If by virtue of your trade you can get master/superview privileges get them even if they exceed your HQ's normal priv sets (my DRMIS MA&S superview is nice)
Haggis said:I remember signing pink pay sheets for extra work such as admin, pre and post ex drills etc. Those were the ones that would get submitted at years end IF there was any money left.
Now CF Mil Pers instr 20-04 para 2.14 prohibits unpaid or volunteer duty.