• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

MSM Headline Watch: What a Difference a Day Makes...

The Bread Guy

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
6,513
Points
1,260
Here's the headline from the first version of this story I found on the internet last night:

"Kandahar's new police chief getting results"

This morning, here's another variation for what appears to be, word for word, the same story text:

"Kandahar's police chief in denial: residents; Crime Rate Disputed"

.pdfs attached to compare, contrast and discuss....

- edited to clean up grammar -
 
I believe there is a large albeit only very loosely organized media watch out there that bombards media outlets with E-mails whenever a good news story appears.

This media watch has diverse aims and, I repeat, is not well organized, but Jack Layton’s (and Gerard Kennedy’s) troops out now lefties make common cause with active Taliban workers here in Canada in their relentless efforts to paint it black whenever a good news story appears.

The media is, I think, ‘sensitive’ to its readers/viewers and is quite willing to give them what they want. Editors will not rewrite a story but changing a headline is cheap, easy and ‘good for business,’ too; after all, the customer is always right.

 
E.R. Campbell said:
I believe there is a large albeit only very loosely organized media watch out there that bombards media outlets with E-mails whenever a good news story appears.
Based on that theory, ERC (which makes sense), it'll be interesting to see if the OLD version of the headline gets changed.  Hence the .pdfs to compare, contrast.

E.R. Campbell said:
This media watch has diverse aims and, I repeat, is not well organized, but Jack Layton’s (and Gerard Kennedy’s) troops out now lefties make common cause with active Taliban workers here in Canada in their relentless efforts to paint it black whenever a good news story appears.
This also brings to mind all the "independent" media out there, which, in some cases, are OK with sharing Taliban propaganda word-for-word as "resistance" information - for example...

Afghan resistance statement
Statement regarding mobile phone usage restrictions

Link to Uruknet.info post, 22 Oct 08

Here's the Taliban's version of this one to compare.
 
Update:  Latest version (for online version fed from National Post) has yet another headline:

"Afghan police chief wants to be one of the good guys"

.pdf attached for further comparison...

 
The contemporary MSM is fueled by creating fear and controversy.  They figure good news doesn't sell the advertising space that is their real business.

"Journalism" is a thin veneer for a "profession" that warps truth to fit an agenda of fear, innuendo and gotcha.

It wasn't always so.


Get the DVD "Shipping News" . . .  explains it all so well

"Storm Threatens Village"

'Village Saved from Storm"


It is all about selling advertising space.






 
More mill grist--a rare headline in the Canadian media:

"Afghans rout enemy: Beat back militants under guidance of Canuck mentors"
http://toyoufromfailinghands.blogspot.com/2008/10/afghans-rout-enemy-beat-back-militants.html

Good news is no news?

Mark
Ottawa
 
Haletown said:
Get the DVD "Shipping News" . . .   explains it all so well

"Storm Threatens Village"

'Village Saved from Storm"


It is all about selling advertising space.

Ironically enough, the DVD "Broadcast News" has a kernel of truth in it as well....
 
Haletown said:
The contemporary MSM is fueled by creating fear and controversy.  They figure good news doesn't sell the advertising space that is their real business. It is all about selling advertising space.
The media does not create fear and controversy. It reports controversy where it exists and there are some fearful things in the world. 

The conditions that cause events to become news are: Tragedy, Conflict , Emotion, Controversy, Prominence, Celebrity, Oddity, Suspense, Sex, Money, Danger, Progress, First and Last, Proximity, Closeness, Human Interest.  Those elements attract an audience of readers, viewers and listeners who are then exposed to the advertising that supports the content that creates the audience.  It's about attracting an audience.  No audience - no advertisers - no media.

Story headlines are not written by the same person that writes the story.  The examples in this thread are simple perceptions of whether the glass is half full or half empty.  Upon reading the stories. the headline writers aren't wrong.  They are just different.  Sometimes that is just driven by the physical layout of the page. Does the headline have to fit two columns or three or the space on a web page.   
 
gwp said:
Story headlines are not written by the same person that writes the story.  The examples in this thread are simple perceptions of whether the glass is half full or half empty. 
Indeed - which opens up the question why many (not all) choose to focus on the negative, even if there's a positive element, as well as why we don't see more of the positive element when there is one.


gwp said:
Upon reading the stories. the headline writers aren't wrong.  They are just different. 
Didn't say they were wrong - just showing the range of tone you can get from the same story. 


Sometimes, though, they CAN be wrong - guess someone skipped the lead paragraph and read ahead to the third one (.pdf attached to show pre-fixed version):
Kandahar governor escapes bomb attack
Bob Weber and A.R. Khan, Canadian Press via Globe & Mail, 23 Oct 08

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — Kandahar's provincial police chief narrowly escaped a donkey-borne bomb attack Thursday which left one of his officers dead and one wounded.

The attack occurred just after noon on a road outside Kandahar City as police chief Matiullah Achakzai was headed to the Zhari district in a two-truck police convoy.

Zalmay Ayubi, a spokesman for the provincial governor, said the bomb had been attached to a donkey by the side of the road....

- edited to fix G&M story link -
 
gwp said:
The media does not create fear and controversy.  
...

In my opinion: Not true, at all!

For, at least, the past 25 years creating controversy has been a major preoccupation of the media, especially, TV journalism and "public affairs" programming.

To be fair, the media in the English speaking world, all media, including totally public systems, is in the business of selling its audience to sponsors - which might be a government. No media has any other reason to exist. The role of journalists is to fill up the boring, 'white spaces' and 'dead air' between the advertisements or commercials. And controversy sells. It has always been his way. 'Pioneer' media (17th/18th century) were all born and bred selling very firm 'poins of view' - essentially creating controversy. Whig pamphlets leading to, indeed provoking the Glorious Revolution provide the best example.

The market for 'hard news,' as opposed to opinion, opened very late in the 18th century when journals like The Times were first published. But they were also highly opinionated and they worked to create controversy in order to sell papers by having a 'serial' story.

Controversy is exciting, it is, perforce, 'news.' When it exists the media need do nothing more than report upon it but when there is no controversy of general public interest then it must be created - even fabricated - or, at least, stirred up a bit. Controversy can also be 'entertaining' and, about 25 years ago, journalists like John McLaughlin saw the infotainment market and began the process of creating 'on screen' controversy by turning boring print columnists with very limited readership into TV "shouting heads" in a half hour of engineered controversy masquerading as 'public affairs' broadcasting.

Many media outlets, electronic and print, use a 'false front' of fair and balanced reporting to manufacture controversy where none really exists. Thus, a wholly factual report on some situation is, time and time again, balanced by a 'comment' by someone who has a opinion opposed to whatever is being reported upon. Fact is balanced with opinion and, Presto! we have a controversy - entirely manufactured.

Created controversy is the rule, not the exception, in my opinion.

 
Edward, I'm sure your opinion is correct.

The recent economic storm is ( to me ) proof.

Our finance minister says something, it's spun three different ways and poof!

The consequences are real. People make stupid decisions based on the fear created and the storm is whipped up and perpetuated.  Until the media gets distracted, we all live with the results of spin.

Our friend  Obama is a similar phenomenon.  No one can live up to the absurd expectations created by the media admiration for the Democrat candidate.
Watch what happens when the media tire of this infatuation.

It's sad really. The news is far to important to be entrusted to "the media".
 
"donkey-borne bomb "

OK where is PETA on this one? No doubt trying to get kids to stop drinking milk by threatening them outside school.
 
This is truly a sick thing to do... I mean the animal does not even know what the heck is happening, and BOOM. What are they going to come up with next... CAMEL BOMBS??? Ubique
 
Another example, with far less of a difference between headlines.

Reporter in K'Har writes story, and sends back to CanWest.

National Post online edition runs with headline:
"Canadians troops celebrate latest Afghanistan victories"

Ottawa Citizen online edition runs same story with:
"Canada highlights small victories over Taliban"

It'll be interesting to see how other CanWest papers headline this one.

.pdfs attached to show pre-fix versions
 
Back
Top