paracowboy said:to the best of my knowledge, Buddhism has never forcibly converted anyone.
Never thought of them...you are right...the only thing I've seen them do is to themselves.
paracowboy said:to the best of my knowledge, Buddhism has never forcibly converted anyone.
Stop. Please stop.decoy said:The Muslim world, and indeed, the whole world, shouldn't be giving credence to the hypocritical words of the Catholic church, who have killied, maimed and murdered more people than any religious institution...and don't forget the child molestation...
Point being - the Pope has no moral high ground; no religious instuition does...these are just the words of a frail old man heading up a backward and outdated organization.
GAP said:Never thought of them...you are right...the only thing I've seen them do is to themselves.
DBA said:The Japanese mixture of Buddhism and Shinto spread a lot of grief during the first half of the 20th century. It doesn't have to be the actual teachings of a religion that cause the problem. Its when a movement decides their way is so beneficial to mankind or is the will of a God that any actions to spread it are justified. Implicit in this is a sense of superiority that others are somehow inferior for not already accepting the truth.
The Pope's speech from what I read of it is a renunciation of the use of force to spread a religion and included supporting religious arguements to that effect. The Pope has already made several formal apologies for actions during the Crusades and other periods. No such apology has appeared from the Muslim side for the Jihads against countless countries across the Middle East and Europe.
From my viewpoint it's pretty obvious a large number of Muslims if not a large percentage of them view speading Islam by the sword as a good thing. They believe the world will be a better place and more pleasing to God if all non-Muslims were brought to heal. So them using violence is the will of God and our use of violence is against the will of God.
IN HOC SIGNO said:First of all Buddhism is not a religion it's a philosophy.
They don't believe in a God per se. If you want to have a debate on spirituality or religion that is probably the seeds of a different thread....and let's get a few people who know what they are talking about.
Religion is a major force in human endeavors....it is people searching for the answers to ultimate questions (why am I here? does my life have meaning? etc); a truth which is bigger than all of us. Yes it is and has been highjacked for a lot of bad stuff over the centuries...but it has also done a lot of good...our public education system, charitable causes, compassion for our neighbours and enemies....etc etc
The basis of Western society is the law of Moses and the teachings of Christ. LIke it or not folks that is why Western Society is at the point we are at....when we stray from it we get Hitlers and Mussolinis and Stalins.....kinda like the Taliban!
IN HOC SIGNO said:First of all Buddhism is not a religion it's a philosophy.
They don't believe in a God per se. If you want to have a debate on spirituality or religion that is probably the seeds of a different thread....and let's get a few people who know what they are talking about.
Religion is a major force in human endeavors....it is people searching for the answers to ultimate questions (why am I here? does my life have meaning? etc); a truth which is bigger than all of us. Yes it is and has been highjacked for a lot of bad stuff over the centuries...but it has also done a lot of good...our public education system, charitable causes, compassion for our neighbours and enemies....etc etc
The basis of Western society is the law of Moses and the teachings of Christ. LIke it or not folks that is why Western Society is at the point we are at....when we stray from it we get Hitlers and Mussolinis and Stalins.....kinda like the Taliban!
IN HOC SIGNO said:Religion is a major force in human endeavors....it is people searching for the answers to ultimate questions (why am I here? does my life have meaning? etc); a truth which is bigger than all of us. Yes it is and has been highjacked for a lot of bad stuff over the centuries...but it has also done a lot of good...our public education system, charitable causes, compassion for our neighbours and enemies....etc etc
The basis of Western society is the law of Moses and the teachings of Christ. LIke it or not folks that is why Western Society is at the point we are at....when we stray from it we get Hitlers and Mussolinis and Stalins.....kinda like the Taliban!
From the time when the barbarians overran the Western Empire to the time of the revival of letters, the influence of the Church of Rome had been generally favourable to science, to civilisation, and to good government. But, during the last three centuries, to stunt the growth of the human mind has been her chief object. Throughout Christendom, whatever advance has been made in knowledge, in freedom, in wealth, and in the arts of life, has been made in spite of her, and has everywhere been in inverse proportion to her power.
- The History Of England Vol. I.
1858, by Thomas Babington Macaulay.
sigpig said:Seems to me that the law of Moses and the teachings of Christ were the basis of the Dark Ages. Most of the things that we'd think of as being central to Western society - law, democracy, philosophy, medicine, education, science, to name but a few - owe their origins to ancient Greece or pre-Christian Rome. At one time or another, the Christian church has opposed all of the things on that list as being ungodly.
Many of our greatest medical achievements - transplants, vaccinations, fertility treatments, to name but a few - were initially opposed by the church, and, it seems, are still held to be blasphemous in certain parts of christianity.
At one time, Arabic science, medicine, technology and culture was the most advanced on the planet, bar none. But then, the Mullahs decided that nothing in science could contradict the Koran, and now look what religion has brought for the region.
Here is a great statement:
With the nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons available today, can we really afford to have the hatred and division caused by the debate over whose ancient superstition is the right one?