- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
scoutfinch said:Well, I assure you that you are no where nearly as well placed as I am to make that judgment. Disbarrment is the only mechanism the Barrister's Society has to punish him. The rest is up to the Crown (federal and provincial).
Trust me, the Crown and the Barristers Society can afford to grant him the presumption of innocence. There is more than enough evidence to result in his subsequent disbarrment and/or criminal conviction.
I'm closer to your world than you give me credit.... But that's okay I've had a Crown or two that have treated me as second class too..
The debarrment proceedings are a far second to the Criminal Breach of Trust case. This would be a good opportunity to make an example and bring back some faith in the profession. You haven't convinced me that debarrment is even a suitable penalty for this crime but the word sounds menacing doesn't it?..
This party was in a position of trust, an apparent veteran who has intimate knowledge of our world, revictimized people who were already dragged through a US system and trusted him to right their wrong. :

Try as you may, you must know that popular belief sees the law profession in last place and no where near to everyone's heroes...
firefighters ;D