• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

New accommodations facility at CFB Esquimalt and plan to build more homes on military bases

OceanBonfire

Sr. Member
Reaction score
392
Points
1,080
...

It will include approximately 480 single occupancy rooms, administrative areas, a dining area and galley capable of serving 700 people, a mess that can support 400 people, postal services, coffee shops, and more.

...

Minister Blair reiterated that Budget 2024 makes additional investments for the Department of National Defence to build and renovate housing for CAF personnel on bases across Canada. This will support the construction of up to 1,400 new homes and the renovation of an additional 2,500 existing units for CAF members on base in communities such as Esquimalt, Edmonton, Borden, Trenton, Kingston, Petawawa, Ottawa, Valcartier, and Gagetown. Building more on-base housing will not only help meet the housing needs of military personnel but also help address housing demand in surrounding communities, since fewer military personnel will require rentals in these areas.

Minister Blair also highlighted the federal government’s national effort to unlock more public lands for housing.

...


 
Does anyone know if this is new, additional housing or replacing the old shacks that have been uncondemed/recondemned a few times, as well as the messes that are literally falling into the ocean?

It's good news as Victoria is particularly brutal, but if the dumbasses charge 'fair market value' it still won't be affordable.
 
Does anyone know if this is new, additional housing or replacing the old shacks that have been uncondemed/recondemned a few times, as well as the messes that are literally falling into the ocean?

It's good news as Victoria is particularly brutal, but if the dumbasses charge 'fair market value' it still won't be affordable.
Article says that it replacing Nelles Block. I am not sure if it is actually an increase in suites.
 
1950s buildings, must be nice. Priority for shacks for jr NCMs in high cost areas is great, but there's way older buildings in the CAF (queue PRes restructure dogwhistle...)
 
Replacement not additional it seems.
Completed in the early 2030s so not a solution for near term but still important.
Single occupancy rooms vs single bedroom apartments. Interesting conventional choice that seems limiting unless this is more for pers in the training system vs not. We likely need both types I suppose.

It’s not unimportant but honestly I don’t see it as an investment in additional capacity simply an overdue maintenance of existing capacity.
 
We really need faster solutions for the CAF housing crisis. I think a cheap solutions would be the tiny home concept, as well as pre fab homes. The average tiny home can be built in 6 weeks, mass produce them and you could probably ship a lot of units really quickly. Ditto for using prefab homes for PMQs. All it takes is political will and money.
 
Replacement not additional it seems.
Completed in the early 2030s so not a solution for near term but still important.
Single occupancy rooms vs single bedroom apartments. Interesting conventional choice that seems limiting unless this is more for pers in the training system vs not. We likely need both types I suppose.

It’s not unimportant but honestly I don’t see it as an investment in additional capacity simply an overdue maintenance of existing capacity.
That's an embarrassing timeline and I'm being kind.

If Accommodations are an issue, there are plenty of prefab and modular solutions that could be built rapidly. The CAF owns a bunch of land. Drop some prefabs on it for the troops and get a bus service going.
 
That's an embarrassing timeline and I'm being kind.

If Accommodations are an issue, there are plenty of prefab and modular solutions that could be built rapidly. The CAF owns a bunch of land. Drop some prefabs on it for the troops and get a bus service going.
My understanding is that pre-fabs/ATCO style might be required in some places to bridge the gap until new, permanent quarters can be built.
 
Wasn’t that described as a shack not too long ago?

It is, its small, very small.

But its probably what we should be building right now, if we want to keep going with single family homes. I know the HRM City Council seems to believe that the future is in density, apartments and condos.
 
To be fair. This project is for the replacement of existing. There is also an open solicitation on MERX for NEW modular accommodations at Esquimalt closing on 14AUG.

ROM estimate is $38M.

So new, as well as replacements.
 
Back
Top