daftandbarmy said:Amen. Except in a few specilized situations e.g., long term OPs, SF operations etc, there should be no need to fill up a rucksack that large. Options? Either 'need less' or have a more efficient echelon system.
ICFY95 said:I haven`t marched with plates in yet (is there a shortage of training plates?- we haven`t seen them yet)
daftandbarmy said:Amen. Except in a few specilized situations e.g., long term OPs, SF operations etc, there should be no need to fill up a rucksack that large. Options? Either 'need less' or have a more efficient echelon system.
Quag said:I understand the ideology behind the Small Pack is that you use that for smaller operations and only use the big ruck on these longer term operations like OP's etc...
Quag said:I understand the ideology behind the Small Pack is that you use that for smaller operations and only use the big ruck on these longer term operations like OP's etc...
George Wallace said:With the amount of equipment and crap I had to lug up to OPs, the last thing I would want to bring up is a humongous ruck.
Quag said:Did you consider putting some of that equipment in the ruck George? That's what our guys do. I think people are blowing this ruck thing out of proportion. While it may only be the 80% solution, it does do a half decent job. It is no bigger than the 82 pattern complete.
Infanteer said:I guess that is if you are using the CF Sleeping Bags. A decent off-the-shelf, military bag (such as those carried by the PPCLI Kitshop) come with compression sacks making them the size of a nalgene. As well, I got an airmatress from MEC that is green and rolls down to roughly the same size. I can carry my sleeping kit in a C9 pouch.
Modern lightweight, compressible gear can allow you to take a 60L MMR/ZXR along way. With add on pockets and a piggyback system, you can expand to 80-100 liters and still have the stability and bring a daypack along for the ride too. The new bag really doesn't have this adaptabilty.
Kat Stevens said:You had a box? Lucky sod. We used to get by in an old empty pilchards tin! Tell kids that today and they won't believe you.
Kat Stevens said:You had a box? Lucky sod. We used to get by in an old empty pilchards tin! Tell kids that today and they won't believe you.
Soldier1stTradesman2nd said:Tried searching - couldn't find it. How does the issued CF sleeping gear fit with the CTS Ruck and new compression sack? I'm talling inner, outer, liner and hood.
Soldier1stTradesman2nd said:Again, not having seen the ruck in real life, I can only go by what I have seen in pictures. From what you described above, the sleeping bag cavity in the ruck must be ginormous. The CF sleeping bags are notoriously bulky and hard to compress.
Getting a good idea on how large the CTS ruck really is. Any pictures to get a sense of scale of internal compartments?
NFLD Sapper said:The only thing "supposed" to go in the compression sack is items that will compress (i.e. sleeping bag). Bivy bag ergo would go in the main compartment of the ruck.
Hatchet Man said:Yeah cause that makes SOO much sense
Hatchet Man said:Yeah cause that makes SOO much sense