Doubts raised over Nicaraguan canal project as trade patterns shift
PUBLISHED : Sunday, 18 January, 2015
Jing Yang and Toh Han Shih
The proposed Nicaragua Canal may struggle to find private investors for financing as the project developer will find the case for a second waterway connecting the Pacific and the Atlantic a hard sell given current global trade patterns.
Andy Lane, partner at Container Transport International Consultancy, struggles to understand why the multibillion-dollar splurge would be a good bet for potential investors.
Lane, who has extensive experience working for shipping lines and ports, pointed out container ships are the major earners for a canal because routing alternatives are more costly for a container shipping line, which profits from regular sailing schedules and networks - similar to a bus service.
For the 100-year-old Panama Canal, which HKND plans to rival, container ships account for a quarter of the traffic but half the revenue, said Lane.
The designed width of the proposed Nicaragua Canal - of 230 to 520 metres - means it will allow only one-way traffic. Lane estimates the new canal will only be able to have 16 vessel transits a day, whereas the Panama Canal averages 34. And, the Panama Canal is not the only rival for the Nicaragua Canal. Suez Canal in the Middle East may be an even bigger competitor.
"Hong Kong is the geographical breakeven point in shipping routes between Asia and US East Coast. It takes approximately 11,000 nautical miles to reach the US East Coast going both west via Suez Canal or east via Panama Canal," said Lane.
With the global manufacturing base shifting to South and Southeast Asia, more shipping lines are expected to transit via the Suez Canal to reach the US East Coast. Maersk Line and Mediterranean Shipping, the world's two largest container shipping lines, have already decided to transport all Asia-US East Coast cargo via the Suez Canal in their operational alliance called 2M starting this year.
Jonathan Beard, who heads ports, logistics and transportation advisory work at US consultancy ICF International echoed Lane:
"The Nicaragua canal's construction costs are substantial. Given the tendency for major projects to over-run, the final cost can be expected to significantly exceed US$50 billion. It is extremely difficult to make the financials stack up."
"A second canal will no doubt be good for shipping lines, but it's doubtful it will be good for the project financers."