• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Old Peacekeeping Warhorses - Are they right?

FSTO

Army.ca Fixture
Reaction score
7,565
Points
1,210
As an Officer in the RCN, I've always considered classical Peacekeeping a role for the Army so I've been agnostic to its usefulness to Canada. If I was honest, it was a way for the GoC to cut real defence capabilities and say "Hey! Look at all the good we are doing in the world."

Anyway, when Bob Rae and Llyod Axworthy both lament the end of Canada's "traditional" role, then something is going right!


 
It served its purpose in the Cold War. After the breakup of my old favorite “enemy” the USSR the old traditional peacekeeping was not effective.
The two sides have to be willing to abide by the agreement but after 1990 or so that went to shit in the FRY. No one was willing to abide by anything
 
It served its purpose in the Cold War. After the breakup of my old favorite “enemy” the USSR the old traditional peacekeeping was not effective.
The two sides have to be willing to abide by the agreement but after 1990 or so that went to shit in the FRY. No one was willing to abide by anything

I don’t think many people, even in the foreign policy sausage factory, realize how it was the superpowers, not the UN, that enforced the peace in those Cold War conflicts.
 
It served its purpose in the Cold War. After the breakup of my old favorite “enemy” the USSR the old traditional peacekeeping was not effective.
The two sides have to be willing to abide by the agreement but after 1990 or so that went to shit in the FRY. No one was willing to abide by anything

If the UN is going to close the office every weekday from 16:00 until 09:00 the next day or 16:00 Friday until 09:00 Monday, they are useless and so are their missions.
Trying to get hold of them, while you're being mortared or having a rocket attack and getting no response because they are at the beach for the weekend, just shows how useless they are. That and risk adverse 12 page ROE's taped to your rifle butt.🙄
 
It served its purpose in the Cold War. After the breakup of my old favorite “enemy” the USSR the old traditional peacekeeping was not effective.
The two sides have to be willing to abide by the agreement but after 1990 or so that went to shit in the FRY. No one was willing to abide by anything

And I seem to remember seeing somewhere that UNIFIL is shutting down this fall.
 
Canada was effective at peacekeeping, because it had a well educated army and junior NCO's could make intelligent decisions that had implication on the geopolitical level. The reason the army was good at this, was because we trained hard to defeat the Soviets and even at the peak of peacekeeping the majority of the army's effort was to defeat the Soviets.
 
Back
Top