• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Ontario Government (Conservative majority), 2025-29

A question is whether a status check (citizenship or immigration) is part of the checklist used by intake staff. If it is, and the staffer didn't, that's a personnel problem. If it isn't or discretionary/inconsistent, that's a policy/legislation problem.
 
I wonder if the worker would routinely have access to that information anyway?

In my dealings with IRCC, they’re grudging in their information sharing. I don’t know if someone working for Ontario Works even could simply ask about immigration status and expect an answer.

Good question. The tribunal people make it sound like they do as a part of the evaluation process.


An Ontario Works intake case officer had not conducted an immigration search to ascertain the man’s benefits eligibility.
 
Good question. The tribunal people make it sound like they do as a part of the evaluation process.


An Ontario Works intake case officer had not conducted an immigration search to ascertain the man’s benefits eligibility.
That doesn’t necessarily mean they routinely do; just that in this case they didn’t.
 
That doesn’t necessarily mean they routinely do; just that in this case they didn’t.
Would applying it on a case by case basis not open them up for favoritism accusations?

The story here reads the worker went out of his way to avoid it, knowing to do so would jeapordize buddies status.
 
Would applying it on a case by case basis not open them up for favoritism accusations?

The story here reads the worker went out of his way to avoid it, knowing to do so would jeapordize buddies status.
I guess it would come down to whether the federal Privacy Act, and any agreement between the feds and the province, allow for that sort of information sharing to be done routinely without some sort of statutory investigation.

I have no idea.
 
Back
Top