• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Ontario Judge Dismisses Murder Charges For Jail Actions- fromLiberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

lenaitch

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Reaction score
5,631
Points
1,160

Carney government targets violent, repeat offenders with proposed bail regime changes


This looks like a great move by Carney. It's still a little bit targeted for my taste but it seems like big steps in a great direction. Not a very Liberal-like approach, it's a good sign Carney isn't drinking the kool-aid.

Poilievres criticism of the "principle of restraint," seems measured and relevant.
Now (once it is passed) all the provinces have to do is better fund the correctional and court system.
 
Now (once it is passed) all the provinces have to do is better fund the correctional and court system.
Topical to this: farther upthread I and others have mentioned that the conditions of provincial corrections are a constraint to holding more people in custody and are a factor in more people getting bail.

A judge has just stayed proceedings (stopped the prosecution) against three charged with murder due to “torturous state actions” at Ontario’s Maplehurst Correctional Complex. This arises out of events in December 2023 where inmates were collectively abused following an assault on a guard.

Conditions in provincial corrections are pretty dire, and this absolutely needs to be addressed ASAP if we want to see more ‘jail not bail’.

 
Are there any reports of administrative, disciplinary, or legal action taken against the correctional officers involved?
 
Topical to this: farther upthread I and others have mentioned that the conditions of provincial corrections are a constraint to holding more people in custody and are a factor in more people getting bail.

A judge has just stayed proceedings (stopped the prosecution) against three charged with murder due to “torturous state actions” at Ontario’s Maplehurst Correctional Complex. This arises out of events in December 2023 where inmates were collectively abused following an assault on a guard.

Conditions in provincial corrections are pretty dire, and this absolutely needs to be addressed ASAP if we want to see more ‘jail not bail’.

So once again, accused rights trump victim's rights. Two days sitting in your underpants plus zip ties on your wrists equals a get out of jail free card for murder (alleged). Not bad. I surely hope there was more to the guards' actions than just that. There had to have been a better solution by the judge.
 
So once again, accused rights trump victim's rights. Two days sitting in your underpants plus zip ties on your wrists equals a get out of jail free card for murder (alleged). Not bad. I surely hope there was more to the guards' actions than just that. There had to have been a better solution by the judge.
There was a lot more. Did you read anything further about it?

I’m still waiting to read the judge’s written decision- and I’m sure there will be an appeal. But the main thrust of this is that the state’s conduct was so utterly egregious that the court had to disassociate itself from it. Judges do not use words like ‘torturous’ lightly. Presumably if that case was tossed, many others have been or will be.

Do I think this is an extreme response? Yes. Do I like it? No. Am I ok with it? Also no. Do I recognize and understand why the judge felt pushed to this point? Yes. Do I recognize that this is a HUGE “oh shit!” signal that should be recognized for what it is, highlighting a part of our criminal justice system that has been broken and failing for years and risks the rest of it? Yes I do.
 
So once again, accused rights trump victim's rights. Two days sitting in your underpants plus zip ties on your wrists equals a get out of jail free card for murder (alleged). Not bad. I surely hope there was more to the guards' actions than just that. There had to have been a better solution by the judge.
Where does the misconduct get addressed otherwise? Are you saying that accused (not convicted) individuals in custody can be abused without sanction? Are you saying that they should have defended themselves against their assailants?
 
Where does the misconduct get addressed otherwise? Are you saying that accused (not convicted) individuals in custody can be abused without sanction? Are you saying that they should have defended themselves against their assailants?
Absolutely not what I am implying. It was in the form of a question? Wasn't there another solution that didn't involve turning a potential repeat murderer back on the street to take someone else's life.
 
Topical to this: farther upthread I and others have mentioned that the conditions of provincial corrections are a constraint to holding more people in custody and are a factor in more people getting bail.

A judge has just stayed proceedings (stopped the prosecution) against three charged with murder due to “torturous state actions” at Ontario’s Maplehurst Correctional Complex. This arises out of events in December 2023 where inmates were collectively abused following an assault on a guard.

Conditions in provincial corrections are pretty dire, and this absolutely needs to be addressed ASAP if we want to see more ‘jail not bail’.

Further to last week’s brief discussion on court cases being thrown out due to ‘torturous behavior’ at Ontario’s Maplehurst jail, here’s more detail. The judge tossed things not just because of the behaviour of guards but also because of what appears to be a concerted effort to over things up.

Mods, my apologies- this is a tangent that’s running off and parallel to federal government justice discussions. I don’t know if maybe we need a split thread to address bail, crime, etc?

Article below. Yeah, Toronto Star, got it, but they show their work and it’s mostly just reporting what the judge said.

Original: https://www.thestar.com/news/invest...icle_fa3a512a-86b3-40e8-9a7f-4488c5afcc9c.htm

Non-paywall: https://archive.is/qIp7A
 
Destroying evidence, lying under oath, using the ventilation system to attack inmates...
 
Destroying evidence, lying under oath, using the ventilation system to attack inmates...
This is what happens when you treat managers so badly for decades that no intelligent person with their head on straight would take the job.
And I do feel sorry for the CO's, after years of being assaulted, mocked, and laughed at, there probably was some over enthusiasm. You can only take having piss/shit/fists thrown at you for so long, with no punitive measures taken, before you relish a little payback.

But, ABSOLUTELY fuckin' ridiculous that this has anything to do with charges against people. Just more fodder to stop letting only lawyers be judges, corrupt as the mafia.........not even sure why we have elected officials/ rule of law anymore.
 
And PLEASE, lets stop whining about how bad it is in jail, most working folk would consider 6 months there a friggin' holiday. The worst thing you can do in jail?? Tell folks that it's not bad in jail......last time I remember a lad giving an interview for the local newspaper he had to go to protective custody, made the mistake of telling the truth.
 
Back
Top