- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 110
scoutfinch said:Please explain this statement. Massoud was well known for NOT doing US bidding despite his promises to the contrary. Moreover, I am not sure how you draw a *direct* line between his death and the Clinton administration. Indirect (and arguably tortured) line, yes. Direct line, no.
Shah Massoud, the leader of the Northern Alliance was the main enemy of the Talibs, back when they were running Afghanistan. Robert Kaplan (see “The Soldiers of God” 1991) considers him one of the greatest guerrilla commanders of all time; but, unlike Che Guevara, Ho Chi Minh or Mao, Massoud believed in liberal democratic values; moreover he was planning on implementing them in Afghanistan.
Mujas under the direct command of Massoud inflicted 60% of all Soviet losses in Afghanistan. Massoud worked closely with the CIA not only during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, but also after 1990. He was also the one who pinpointed bin-Laden location to the Americans (during the Clinton administration). But, somehow, Clinton and his cronies decided not to act on intelligence received from Massoud.
The Talibs were aware of Al-Qaeda’s 9/11 plans. They knew that American military backlash was inevitable, since they were harbouring the Al-Qaeda’s leadership; so, they made a deal with bin-Laden. If one of bin-Laden’s men would assassinate Massoud, they would protect him in the aftermath of 9/11. So, two suicidal Al-Qaeda agents masquerading as journalists blew themselves up in Massoud’s presence, killing him. Ergo, no bin-Laden in 2001, no successful assassination attempt on Massoud’s life….
