• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

personal role radios

Cooper said:
I BELIEVE they are used to program the smaller 521s.
I'm not in a comms sqn or anything but from what I've been told/ taught (and had to do a couple of times) the 522s are not used for programming the 521s. You program the 521s by the J-box (its a little number pad type thing, looks like a calculator). You can also hook the radio up to a laptop run a computer program and have the laptop do all the number typing for you. I'm not sure as to how the 522s get programed, I'm assuming the laptop method as they are much more complicated than the simple 521s you can easily program via the J-box.

I stand corrected.  Comms crse is something I'd like to take this summer.  I was told on my BMQ that the 522s programmed the 521s.  It didn't help that I didn't use either outside the classroom.
 
"they" are building IED's who can be triggered by a radio broadcast on a specific frequency. I am not sure how, as it is not my forte, but that is the reason, I am told, FRS radios are not to be used by CF overseas.
 
FRS was a no-no due to lack of encryption - of course we all had PRR's that are no incrypted too...

The 521 is a true POS...
 
KevinB said:
FRS was a no-no due to lack of encryption - of course we all had PRR's that are no incrypted too...

The 521 is a true POS...

Not that I don't disagree to some extent but, could you please elaborate about the 521? I dislike the headsets very much. I am tempted to grab an NS one, (not in rare supply) and splice something nicer to it. As a person whose exposure to the 521 is limited to programming, I'd like to hear what the real users have to say.
 
While in Kabul on Roto 0, the big threat to all users was the RC IED threat. The PRR's were rated against such threats, as they frequency hop making it difficult for the baddies to home in on a section on foot patrolling by. The "civvie" model FRS's were NOT supposed to be used in theatre, as many previous members have said - although there is a right place and time for any piece of kit. In BUA the soldiers (to the best of my knowledge) NEVER used their FRS's, as they were cognisant of the RC IED threat - but out in the badlands with miles of desert around you it didn't pose as much of a threat.
  Speaking from experience, some of the RC devices that were found were very high tech.... that country isn't a back-ass as one would think. All users be wary, even the 521/522's are not impervious to the RC threat - unless you've got the ECM gadgetry attached to your kit and you're in the "safe-bubble'.
 
GDawg said:
Not that I don't disagree to some extent but, could you please elaborate about the 521? I dislike the headsets very much. I am tempted to grab an NS one, (not in rare supply) and splice something nicer to it. As a person whose exposure to the 521 is limited to programming, I'd like to hear what the real users have to say.


As I said earlier, the 521 is a junker because it's a pain to load freq's and krypto into, the range is pretty much useless and the battery power is weak so it loses it's krypto very easily.
 
GerryCan said:
As I said earlier, the 521 is a junker because it's a pain to load freq's and krypto into, the range is pretty much useless and the battery power is weak so it loses it's krypto very easily.

Ditto
 
Iv been on exercises were we use cell phones for comms, because all of our 521's are down, and the FRS are out of range........
 
Right there is the reason I seldomly pack the 521's. I'd rather hump a man-pack all day than mess around with a 521.
 
Two words...

SAT PHONE  ;D

The whatevers its name encrypted jobbied we had in Afghan rocked.
 
Also an excellent piece of kit 8)

You back from Roto 2 Kevin? I'm heading out early february for Julien.
 
Back
Top