• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
Better late than never I guess.

That's excellent news for Canada's O&G industry. We could send loads of LNG off the East coast and sell it to the EU.

Do you think Canada will be in a position to capitalize on this "business case"?
Could be.

 
Better late than never I guess.

That's excellent news for Canada's O&G industry. We could send loads of LNG off the East coast and sell it to the EU.

Do you think Canada will be in a position to capitalize on this "business case"?
The recent SK announcement about Nat Gas off the coast of NFLD could be the start of this shipping to the EU.
 

Impressive in its own way was the original Trans-Mountain pipeline, from Edmonton to Burnaby, B.C., traversing 1,150 kilometres of mostly rugged, mountainous terrain. Construction began in February 1952, finishing eight months later, costing the equivalent of $1.1 billion today. Expansion of the pipeline, proposed by Kinder Morgan in 2013 — 910 kilometres of line for an estimated $6.8 billion — did not go well. Initial federal approvals alone took three years, followed by a taxpayer buyout and an ultimate cost of $34 billion for six years of construction.
We should complete the optimization plan to get the most out of the line given the circumstances
 
I learned the other day that Quebec has major natural gas deposits - why they won't tap into those is beyond me.
 
Back
Top