• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date

If you want to transmit and distribute energy as electricity you must first make electricity from potential energy with generators.

Coal fired plants - 30 to 45% efficient with the norm being closer to 33%
Gas fired plants - 30 to 60% efficient with the norm, again, being closer to 33%
Nuclear plants - 33 to 37% efficient
Wind plants - Turbines are 40 to 60% efficient but the wind is only available 35 to 40% of the time - 40% of 40% is 16% efficient
Solar plants - Panels are 20 to 30% efficient when the sun shines
Water plants - Turbines are 90% efficient but:
high initial costs, significant environmental impact on ecosystems and fish, displacement of local communities, dependence on water availability which can be affected by droughts, and limited suitable locations for construction.

Transmission line losses - about 0.35% per 100 km

Hydro is great if there is water available and it is located in your general vicinity.
Beyond that fuelling up your highly efficient electric car or your AI server starts with a process that is only 30% efficient in harvesting available energy and converting it to usable electricity.

If you want more electricity you are going to need a lot more of something.

.....

The biggest waste would be using electricity to generate heat and heat is a greater survival requirement than lights, cars and computers.

Putting thermal plants in towns makes sense
Putting thermal plants that can also generate electricity in towns makes more sense.
Putting thermal plants that can also generate electricity and incinerate waste in town makes even more sense.
 
I hope he shoves a pipeline down Eby's throat.

Sadly, that might not happen... yet


A leaked list of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s priorities for major projects does not appear to include an Alberta pipeline.

A senior Ontario government official — who was not authorized to speak publicly — shared details of Carney’s major project announcement, scheduled for B.C. later Thursday, with the Canadian Press.

According to the report, Carney’s next priorities include a nickel mine in Ontario, a hydroelectric project in Iqaluit as well as mining projects in Quebec, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and B.C.


A liquefied natural gas plant in B.C., where Carney is expected to make the announcement, is also on the list.


 
Sadly, that might not happen... yet


A leaked list of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s priorities for major projects does not appear to include an Alberta pipeline.

A senior Ontario government official — who was not authorized to speak publicly — shared details of Carney’s major project announcement, scheduled for B.C. later Thursday, with the Canadian Press.

According to the report, Carney’s next priorities include a nickel mine in Ontario, a hydroelectric project in Iqaluit as well as mining projects in Quebec, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and B.C.


A liquefied natural gas plant in B.C., where Carney is expected to make the announcement, is also on the list.



I don't see much inter-provincial stuff on that list at all.
Why are the Feds involved?
 
Nice to know that 25-33 percent support for seperation somehow now equals wanting to seperate.

It's been trending upward. About 1/3rd today... might be 2/3rds by the time PMMC is done. If Alberta or Quebec goes, the country breaks apart.

Peter Zeihan has a whole chapter on this in his book the Accidental Superpower. Worth reading, that is if you wanted an outsiders observations on the situation.
 
Canada will never become an energy superpower when you have provinces against projects of national interest due to their views. Are we only Canadians when convenient?
 
Back
Top