• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
Oh wait, what's this ;)

Trudeau taps Carney for help in crafting COVID-19 recovery plan​

August 11, 2020 EnergyNow Media

Mark Carney, the only person to run two major central banks, is helping Justin Trudeau craft next steps in a plan to pull Canada out of a deep recession sparked by the coronavirus.

Five months after stepping down as Bank of England governor, Carney has become an informal adviser on policy matters with the Canadian prime minister. Trudeau is leaning on the former Goldman Sachs banker as a sounding board for what officials are characterizing as an ambitious economic recovery plan, according to a person familiar with internal policy operations.

The plan will seek to tackle everything from deficiencies in the social safety net to climate change, infrastructure and immigration. The first measures are likely be rolled out in a budget update this fall before a more comprehensive fiscal package early next year, the person said.


So do we blame Mulroney for 'being tapped' by Trudeau to help guide the CUSMA discussions in the past?
 
Carney was one of Trudeau's economic advisors.
I understand that. But, there's always a but, unless we know what that the actually meant, meaning; was any advice/guidance asked for, given when asked for and lastly, enacted when asked for and received, its really nothing more than a PR move done by the PM and the PMO.
 
There is absolutely no doubt that Justin Trudeau was an absolute disaster for the Canadian economy, but the Conservatives really need to pivot their messaging from the past to the present if they want to be seen as a good alternative to the Carney Liberals.

Report tracks capital flight between 2015 and 2024.

Comment from Conservative MP: "This is the record of the Liberal government under Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney".

Mark Carney became leader of the Liberal party in 2025.
Mark Carney was advising Trudeau long before 2024. I am definitely not a Carney fan but he has been saying good things. I say wait and see if government actions match Carney's words and much of that will depend upon what happens with our resource management. Will we see another pipeline? Will we see Churchill development? Will they encourage mineral extraction? Will the laws be changed to facilitate development and encourage investment?
 
I understand that. But, there's always a but, unless we know what that the actually meant, meaning; was any advice/guidance asked for, given when asked for and lastly, enacted when asked for and received, its really nothing more than a PR move done by the PM and the PMO.

Carney attached himself to Trudeau and vice versa. One of the many reasons I was and remain loathe to have any faith in the current government.
 
I say wait and see if government actions match Carney's words and much of that will depend upon what happens with our resource management. Will we see another pipeline? Will we see Churchill development? Will they encourage mineral extraction? Will the laws be changed to facilitate development and encourage investment?
Carney has been making feel good noises and promises for the last year. He hasn't accomplished anything in respect to those promises. The only thing that seems to have gained traction is that ridiculous high speed rail. Which is now totally bogged down with accusations of nepotism and conflicts of interest by liberals before there was a shovel in the ground.
 
Carney has been making feel good noises and promises for the last year. He hasn't accomplished anything in respect to those promises. The only thing that seems to have gained traction is that ridiculous high speed rail. Which is now totally bogged down with accusations of nepotism and conflicts of interest by liberals before there was a shovel in the ground.
Well ground breaking on the Montreal port expansion was 6 months after being referred to the MPO. It was the project furthest along, id expect to see more this summer
 
Carney has been making feel good noises and promises for the last year. He hasn't accomplished anything in respect to those promises. The only thing that seems to have gained traction is that ridiculous high speed rail. Which is now totally bogged down with accusations of nepotism and conflicts of interest by liberals before there was a shovel in the ground.
I know and I haven't a lot of faith but maybe, just maybe something good will happen.
 
Well ground breaking on the Montreal port expansion was 6 months after being referred to the MPO. It was the project furthest along, id expect to see more this summer
hadn't it already basically been approved? The whole thing sounded more like a PR initiative than an actual project to shovels accomplishment
 
Well ground breaking on the Montreal port expansion was 6 months after being referred to the MPO. It was the project furthest along, id expect to see more this summer
So the announced and moving forward, plans to increase TransMountain to 1.3m barrels/day and the newly announced (that I posted yesterday), 500k barrels/day to the US don’t count for anything in your books.
That will be a 1.83m barrels/day by 2028 increase of Albertan oil being exported.
 
Carney has been making feel good noises and promises for the last year. He hasn't accomplished anything in respect to those promises.

Yeah...but not true:


Of 603 commitments, the government has started some sort of action on 474 (78%) of them, while completing 181 (30%) of them. Take issue with what was promised, but saying the current government is doing nothing is not backed by the facts.
 
So the announced and moving forward, plans to increase TransMountain to 1.3m barrels/day and the newly announced (that I posted yesterday), 500k barrels/day to the US don’t count for anything in your books.
That will be a 1.83m barrels/day by 2028 increase of Albertan oil being exported.
Im counting whats going to through the MPO for the purposes of this conversation at the moment.

hadn't it already basically been approved? The whole thing sounded more like a PR initiative than an actual project to shovels accomplishment
More fast tracking red tape

In other news Ottawa wants to ship LNG from Churchill by 2030


 
Yeah...but not true:


Of 603 commitments, the government has started some sort of action on 474 (78%) of them, while completing 181 (30%) of them. Take issue with what was promised, but saying the current government is doing nothing is not backed by the facts.

Quoting numbers on a graphic doesn't give a real and substantial picture of what is going on. Here's the accompanying article that explains those numbers.


A Report on Carney’s First Year in Government​

Proposed by
697b7ef8474af24d980829e0_Logo%20Box.png

Build Canada​

Article


Progress is real, but it's mostly groundwork: 77.7% of commitments are In Progress or Completed. But most of that movement looks like consultations launched, early funds deployed, and line items in departmental plans, not outcomes Canadians can see or feel.
Execution has not caught up to rhetoric: Legislation bottlenecks stalled a significant chunk of the agenda. Healthcare and Justice have seen just six completions each, and 5.9 million Canadians still don't have a family doctor. Bill C-15 passing clears some of the logjam, but a full year in, the government still is not implementing at the speed voters urgently called for.

The low hanging fruit has been picked. The big-ticket items have yet to break through: The 181 completed items were largely things that needed only a ministerial signature or a tax change. The commitments that would reshape daily life, from housing and healthcare to export credit, are still in progress or not started. Year two needs to look different.


Build Canada reviewed all 603 commitments the government made and assessed them against timelines and promises it set for itself. Our report is as objective as possible, however you may notice a builder's lens appear throughout.

Last year, Prime Minister Mark Carney told Canadians that the country was in a time of national crisis. He promised to build at speeds not seen in generations. What’s happened since?

Build Canada’s outcomes tracker investigated all 603 commitments made by the Carney government. Its purpose: to make accessible to the public precisely what’s been promised, view the progress so far, and locate the sources behind every update from a single dashboard. The tool evaluates the government against the commitments and timelines it set for itself, not through the quality or wisdom of them or any partisan lens.

Across all commitments as of March 30, 2025: 288 are in progress, 129 have not started, 181 are completed, and 5 were abandoned. Much of the progress so far is either ground work or incremental.

The data we have collected points to a first year spent consulting, planning, and beginning to deploy funds, mainly through small initial tranches from multi-year spending envelopes.

Some items reflect completion of earlier or previous government promises, and Budget Bill C-15 was a massive piece of legislation that took much time and energy within the House of Commons. And several of the biggest-ticket items that affect Canadians’ daily lives — from housing and health infrastructure to export credit — are still waiting to transition from ideas to plans to delivery.


However their work is not without merit. A handful of files stand out: the Defence Investment Agency is up and running, with nearly $1.4 billion in domestic ammunition contracts supporting new factories and jobs. The interprovincial trade legislation removed barriers to goods, services, and workers having their licences and certificates recognized across provinces. And Canada this week reached NATO’s 2% spending target, marking the first time since the end of the Cold War and coming six years ahead of the previous government’s schedule.



69cacac24e7a64d20c7ad5b0_583472ae.png

69cacac24e7a64d20c7ad5b9_80a59496.png



Canada is no longer standing on the sidelines. But it now needs to pick up pace with the policy boldness, regulatory clarity, and permitting speed that a crisis calls for. The tracker’s findings show where momentum is overdue.



Finding 1: Modest progress across files

One of the most significant patterns in the data: 469 of 603 commitments (77.7%) currently register as "In Progress" or “Completed”. That’s encouraging. Much of the movement takes one of a few limited forms: preliminary consultations have been launched, initial fund deployments from multi-year spending envelopes have been made, or a line item now appears in a departmental plan.

69cacac24e7a64d20c7ad5b6_90626eef.png

These are necessary steps, and some of the investments are long-term by design. This includes rebuilding the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), standing up new defence procurement systems, and deploying $115 billion in infrastructure over five years. These are multi-generational bets that were never going to show results in year one. That’s a good thing: a government is thinking in five- to 15-year windows, rather than just the next election cycle.

While Bill C-15 passed last week, the work needed to carry them through to completion is still substantial, and the tangible outcomes that would change Canadians’ everyday lives remain out of reach. Bold, decisive steps are needed to match the scale and urgency of the crisis Canada is in.



Examples from the data:



Finding 2: Execution has not caught up to Rhetoric

Our methodology was strict: a commitment was not counted as started simply because it appeared in a budget document. The distinction matters because announcements and tabled bills do not change outcomes for Canadians until they become law.

It's worth acknowledging the effort to clarify intent. However, the data shows a persistent pattern: deliberation on critical policy categories dragged on, and several files were held up. Bills had either been tabled, were in committee, or were awaiting Royal Assent.

Leading up to Bill C-15 passing last week, a significant portion of the government's agenda was stalled by legislation. Of the 165 commitments that require a bill to pass, 130 were marked "In Progress." With the passage of Bill C-15, that number has since fallen to 47. Until those remaining bills pass, those files do not move and Canadians do not see or feel results.



69cacac24e7a64d20c7ad5b3_7b41ead7.png



That gap is especially visible in Healthcare and Justice. These areas were central to the public conversation heading into the last election. Canadians were promised action on family doctors, health infrastructure, justice corrections, and firearms. Yet in both Healthcare and Justice, there have been six completions to date, and an estimated 5.9 million adults do not have a family doctor, nurse practitioner or primary care team.

A full year in, the government still is not implementing at the speed voters urgently called for.



Examples from the data:



Finding 3: The low hanging fruit has been picked, and the big-ticket items have yet to break through

Our review of the 181 commitments marked as completed revealed another telling pattern: the government acted first on measures that required only a ministerial signature, a tax change, or action through existing programs.

That was the right place to start. But the commitments that would most directly reshape daily life in Canada are still largely unfinished — housing, healthcare, and the economy.

The files that require new institutions, new legislation, new programs, and sustained political will are still on the drawing board. That’s understandable in year one, but year two needs to look different. The groundwork has been laid on many of these files. Now the big-ticket items need to move.



Examples of what got completed:



Examples of what hasn’t been completed:


Conclusion

Taken together, the findings tell a clear story: real progress has been made, and it should be recognized. But much of what has happened so far has followed the path of least resistance: quick wins, low-risk spending, procedural check-boxes. Canadian democracy has a long record of moving on what is easiest and deferring what is hardest.

This government has the mandate, the agenda, and the stated ambition to break that pattern. And while the data shows it hasn’t yet, it also points to a breakthrough within reach. We imagine they will do so over the next year


Completing paperwork, making promises, completing previous government’s projects and doling out cash isn't shovels in the ground.
 
There is absolutely no doubt that Justin Trudeau was an absolute disaster for the Canadian economy, but the Conservatives really need to pivot their messaging from the past to the present if they want to be seen as a good alternative to the Carney Liberals.

Report tracks capital flight between 2015 and 2024.

Comment from Conservative MP: "This is the record of the Liberal government under Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney".

Mark Carney became leader of the Liberal party in 2025.

I agree the less we mention Trudeau's name the better.

But the critique of this Gov doesnt start in 2025. It goes back to 2015.

And any denial of that is just an attempt to whitewash the historical truth, probably out of embarrassment of ones own political biases.

This iteration, since 2015, of the LPC put us in this position. All stop. And some how they managed to convince Canadians they can fix their mess. Well.

Letterkenny GIF by Crave


People want more of their own cash in their pockets and a future that doesn't look like shit for their kids. Ceremonial sod turnings in Mtl wont do that.
 
So the announced and moving forward, plans to increase TransMountain to 1.3m barrels/day and the newly announced (that I posted yesterday), 500k barrels/day to the US don’t count for anything in your books.
That will be a 1.83m barrels/day by 2028 increase of Albertan oil being exported.
where does to government fit into it? They are simply increasing the flow in some manner. There is no new construction so no change to the infrastructure. Are the oil companies receiving global prices for the product or is it still discounted?
 
where does to government fit into it? They are simply increasing the flow in some manner. There is no new construction so no change to the infrastructure. Are the oil companies receiving global prices for the product or is it still discounted?
The need to approve the regulatory approvals to increase the flow - 1) The use of the additives into the pipeline to increase the flow, 2) the construction of new pumping stations along the pipeline to increase the flow. Both of these require approval.
Lastly, if you're referring to TM and discounted prices, the oil in TM has never been 'discounted' since its going to 'any buyer' who's willing to pay fair market prices when it reaches the coast. Adding more oil flowing to the US will NOT result in our oil getting world prices since we are kneecapped to selling to only 1 buyer. IF we controlled the entire pipeline route through the US and the terminal to ship the oil from it, then that would be a different case - but good luck in having the US allow that to happen.
 
Quoting numbers on a graphic doesn't give a real and substantial picture of what is going on. Here's the accompanying article that explains those numbers.

Anyone expecting the big rocks to be moved immediately is being unrealistic and setting themselves up for disappointment (or is just a partisan cynic). It would be akin to declaring the CAF's investment plan a failure as it doesn't have modern vehicles, ships, fighters and upgraded bases after one year. Of course progress to date has been the quick wins and low-hanging fruit. Big projects take time, hence why the first line of the posted article says "Progress is real, but it's mostly groundwork."

It is also fair to be cautiously skeptical (the article certainly is, highlighting that "much of what has happened so far has followed the path of least resistance") as the largest hurdles are political in nature - undoing inefficient legislation and eliminating burdensome regulatory frameworks that have scared money off for a decade. That the government had to create a "Major Projects Office" clearly acknowledges that the normal government process is terrible - one would hope that the government would have just fixed the existing process rather than bypassing it with a new one.

You said "Carney has been making feel good noises and promises for the last year. He hasn't accomplished anything in respect to those promises" and then underline in the article that "Taken together, the findings tell a clear story: real progress has been made, and it should be recognized." Which is it? One can see the glass as half full (because anything is better than Trudeau and the focus on investment and infrastructure is sound) or as half empty (because many of the same Trudeau-enabler people are still around) but both the data and the article show that there is water in the glass.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top