- Reaction score
- 118
- Points
- 680
CountDC said:bet they throw it back on the member - "it is the members responsibility to be aware of the rules and policies, to ask questions of the subject matter expert when not sure and ensure they are within said rules and policies."
I do know in the first half of 2006 members in Halifax were informed of the DCBA policy but don't think anyone even checked the lease to see if it was a 1 bedroom. As I recall the only concern was that it had members name on it and the monthly amount.
These "rules" and/or their "strict enforcement" are f'n quaint aren't they?
Shit like this happens when people do not use common sense. Hello Ottawa (and apparently hello Halifax too).
I can tell you this much, during my IR in Charlottetown PEI, the only 1 bedroom apartments for rent were unfurnished. And, they were for terms of year-long leasing. (year-long <--- which itself is NOT a lease term recommended by the IR overseers and their DCBA Aide memoire) with all those Holland College & UPEI students in mind. There was NO place in the entire province to "rent furniture" to furnish it with, there only being the Rent-to-own places (which is itself prohibited by those overseers of IR and their DCBA Aide Memoire).
So, I could get a two-bedroom, fully furnished apartment for UNDER the monthly entitlement limit ... but not a one bedroom and certainly not a one bedroom furnished apartment. I was located away from the uni district.
I'd have loved to be the one they (or Ottawa) told "move out" of the two bedroom because you aren't "entitled to it".
Yo dudes, word up: It SAVED the taxpayers money monthly by me being in a furnished 2 bedroom vice an unfurnished 1 bedroom ... and if you had expected to me to sleep on a floor in a one bedroom because "that" was "all" that I was entitled to because I refused to purchase furniture when there was no place to rent it and the CF put me there IR in the first place ... I'll guarantee my redress of grieveance would have made it's eventual way to the Omsbudsman.
If people are under their monthly entitlement limit be it a one bedroom or two bedroom --- there is ZERO problem to fix. But, situation normal for some "enforcer" to render invalid common sense application according to "availability" in locale.
Some f'n asshat on IR probably claimed his 2 bedroom apartment and got nailed sub-letting the second bedroom out to some non-CF type while claiming his full IR rental cost each month ... causing those who refuse to punish pers who abuse the system to fuck around the rest of us who don't. Now that IS normal for the CF. <--- You know, I'm willing to bet a pole dance on that; and, Recceguy, I'd even move my cereal bowl out of the way of the webcam.