A
ArmyBrat
Guest
Forgive me if this topic has already been covered, I have been monitoring this discussion forum for quite some time, but have just now registered.
I am an Army reservist with the Calgary Highlanders. I‘d rather not give out my name for my own personal privacy, however, in recent months, I have noticed that - while our training with other local units has increased, so has the "quality of equipment" used by the various units.
In observation, our entire unit was relatively shocked at the much higher quality equipment our unit, the Calgary Highlanders, was using, in comparison to the 33rd Field Engineer Squadron, who we were conducting our exercise with.
A few examples of this equipment-inequality were the following: We have half of our unit almost completely outfitted with CADPAT, minus the new recruits and personnel who have been in for less than a year. Only their senior staff had CADPAT, none of whopping 2-sections worth of soldiers had any.
We have the new communications equipment, actually received 2yrs ago. (Short range tactical radios, the PRC-319 field radios, etc.) However, we were surprized to discover they were still using the OLD, OLD, OLD comms. equipment...the big old rusty comm. sets from the Vietnam type era.
And here is something that took us by major surprize. Our unit has a fine collection of Iltis jeeps, and the required supporting logistical vehicles. Some of the soldiers in the 33rd had forgotten what the Iltis was called...BECAUSE THEIR UNIT HAD NONE. Now, I know they are very practical for our purposes, as infantry...however, would they NOT be equally as practical for the FE‘s?
Also, and I‘m not sure if this is the same for regular force regiments too...but, they didn‘t have M203s. I know the Engineers generally don‘t do a lot of direct action engagements, but...we were astonished to find them lacking M203s, Iltis jeeps, and the old olive drabs.
Anybody know more about this than I do?
I am an Army reservist with the Calgary Highlanders. I‘d rather not give out my name for my own personal privacy, however, in recent months, I have noticed that - while our training with other local units has increased, so has the "quality of equipment" used by the various units.
In observation, our entire unit was relatively shocked at the much higher quality equipment our unit, the Calgary Highlanders, was using, in comparison to the 33rd Field Engineer Squadron, who we were conducting our exercise with.
A few examples of this equipment-inequality were the following: We have half of our unit almost completely outfitted with CADPAT, minus the new recruits and personnel who have been in for less than a year. Only their senior staff had CADPAT, none of whopping 2-sections worth of soldiers had any.
We have the new communications equipment, actually received 2yrs ago. (Short range tactical radios, the PRC-319 field radios, etc.) However, we were surprized to discover they were still using the OLD, OLD, OLD comms. equipment...the big old rusty comm. sets from the Vietnam type era.
And here is something that took us by major surprize. Our unit has a fine collection of Iltis jeeps, and the required supporting logistical vehicles. Some of the soldiers in the 33rd had forgotten what the Iltis was called...BECAUSE THEIR UNIT HAD NONE. Now, I know they are very practical for our purposes, as infantry...however, would they NOT be equally as practical for the FE‘s?
Also, and I‘m not sure if this is the same for regular force regiments too...but, they didn‘t have M203s. I know the Engineers generally don‘t do a lot of direct action engagements, but...we were astonished to find them lacking M203s, Iltis jeeps, and the old olive drabs.
Anybody know more about this than I do?
