Ripsaw Bought by Sweden

[Kirkhill]

Canada's Tanks, Future Armour, Armoured Recce, Medium Cavalry or even Artillery....

Sweden has purchased the Ripsaw autonomous vehicle.
When I saw the picture in the Defense Post I bwas struck by similarities to the 1960s Swedish S-Tank, the S-103, sometimes a tank, sometimes a tank-destroyer, sometimes an assault gun, sometimes close support field artillery.
I wonder if the Swedes are contemplating putting the autoloading 105mm L7 of the S-103 on the back of Ripsaw.

It would make both an effective anti-tank system and a line breaker to accompany autonmous/RC engineering vehicles.

https://thedefensepost.com/2025/12/03/sweden-european-buyer-ripsaw/

Tread Boldly

Your day demands everything you have. Every capability in your tool kit should work as hard as you do. When everything’s on the line, Textron Systems is with you. Because the right technologies and the right support are powerful. Groundbreaking thinking across domains, with your success as our...

www.howeandhowe.com

 

[Kirkhill]

Logistics seems to be the prime motivator but this article suggests the Ripsaw might be overkill in that regard. I still think it could be a worthwhile platform for a DFS or LAA system, something that could relocate rapidly within a well-defined defended locale.

Sweden Orders 6-Ton Ripsaw M3 Robots as Ukraine Proves Smaller UGVs Work Better | Defense Express

Ripsaw M3 not the largest in series, but still quite large and heavy drone

en.defence-ua.com

"Judging from the fact that the news about the contract with Sweden mentions a "transport UGV," it means that the Swedish military will receive a logistics version of this unmanned ground vehicle.

"And this is quite a large (and probably quite expensive) UGV with a mass of about 5,900 kg and the ability to transport cargo weighing over 2,200 kg, while its maximum speed reaches 48 km/h.

"Today, Ukraine's Defense Forces are increasingly using UGVs for logistics and evacuating wounded, however, we're talking about much smaller platforms and, one can assume, times or even dozens of times cheaper.

"Therefore, how practical it is to equip an army with such large platforms as Ripsaw M3, not to mention the 10-ton M5, is a very big question, considering that for the same funds one can purchase a significantly larger number of smaller platforms, which are often expendable material given their vulnerability to FPV drones."