• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Royal in Regimental Name.

Status
Not open for further replies.
AJFitzpatrick said:
At the risk of further sidetracking - is Eccles Hill the oldest Canadian Battle Honour ? - it was 1870 so just 3 years after Confederation.

Further aside: was Major Dennis Bloodnok involved in any way?  - Merry Christmas and Custard.

There was also Trout River from that conflict.

A Royal Newfoundland Regiment (or Fencibles depending on year) earned the battle honour Niagara for the War of 1812 but it is not perpetuated by the current regiment.
 
Michael O'Leary said:
So please, go back to whatever little circle of delusional friends you shared your imaginary history with before us.

Academia?  Never left it, although my recent efforts have been in church history.

Michael O'Leary said:
Your meandering little arguments based on your personal preferences are getting tiresome.

I don't think my argument has changed one iota over time.  The beauty about me having fallacious opinions is that it gives you an opportunity to prove me wrong.  I would be quite pleased to post here WITHOUT me always becoming the topic.
 
Don't we already have an "1812 And All That" thread under full sail around here somewhere?  I thought this was about something else.
 
Kat Stevens said:
Don't we already have an "1812 And All That" thread under full sail around here somewhere?  I thought this was about something else.

I did too....twice.

:stars:

dileas

tess

 
Dennis Ruhl said:
Academia?  Never left it, although my recent efforts have been in church history.

Alright, this one is spinning in the toilet already.        ::)

I can't recall responding to any of your posts, so here it goes.

Dennis Ruhl - The CF doesn't care about anything before 1883. It was all British units for the most part and you know it.

You are consistently coming on here trying to force your POV with absolutely nothing to back it up other than a feeble argument at best.

It's either units that were axed long before you were born or getting Battle Honours placed on unit's Guidons that the CF/ DDH have identified and now this tripe.

No one really cares about this topic one bit, nor any others that you've come on here going on adnauseum about.

Most troops, for the most-part, know their Regimental histories and take pride in the fact that all connections have been thoroughly researched and well documented officially. Yes, there are still older ties to forgotten Regiments from the 13 Colonies and, for the most part, are still celebrated in an unofficial capacity.

Take the 8th Canadian Hussars. They can trace back their lineage to 1775 in the Colony of Virginia where Captain John Saunders, of Princess Anne County, raised a troop of cavalry at his own expense to fight for the Crown against the Colonial rebels.

Should they (the current day 8CH) get to have a Battle Honour on their Guidon for that action as well? Don't bother answering because I don't want to hear it.


I don't think my argument has changed one iota over time.  The beauty about me having fallacious opinions is that it gives you an opportunity to prove me wrong.  I would be quite pleased to post here WITHOUT me always becoming the topic.

I'm sure with your MO you'd like to see it on there....but I'm sure you'll have some BS quip or retort that will be disproved yet again by the majority of the membership here. You are constantly the topic at hand and you relish it every time.

For the most part, troops these days are concentrating on current operations and not getting killed in battle. The last thing on their minds (not like any of them actually care) is your take on how history should be re-written to your satisfaction.

Do us all a favour, go back to Academia where you can substantiate these frivolous claims of glory to your buddies as they beat their tables and thump their chests in support.....because the membership here is tired of your rhetoric.

Regards
 
Der Panzerkommandant.... said:
The CF doesn't care about anything before 1883. It was all British units for the most part and you know it.

British?  As were we all before the Canadian Citizenship Act took affect January 1, 1947.

I searched a couple hundred websites looking for clues on the Royal title and could find nothing specific but in all cases it was mentioned as an honour even prior to the time of the American Revolution.  I guess I'll remain unsure of the reasons for the many Loyalist and one Canadian anomolies.

 
Dennis Ruhl said:
British?  As were we all before the Canadian Citizenship Act took affect January 1, 1947.

I searched a couple hundred websites looking for clues on the Royal title and could find nothing specific but in all cases it was mentioned as an honour even prior to the time of the American Revolution.  I guess I'll remain unsure of the reasons for the many Loyalist and one Canadian anomolies.

Ya just don't get it do you.....that was my way of giving you a subtle hint to go on hiatus for a spell.

How about this.......I'll be more blunt.

Locked. Now you're on hiatus.

The Army.ca Staff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top