Sorry, no idea who "Pike" was or is, and I have not read any posts by or concerning him. I am me, and what you see is what you get.
A word on profiles. As George Wallace has pointed out, mine is as sketchy as the Ruxted Group's. It is sketchy because, as an individual, I would like what I post to be considered on its own merits, without reference to putative authority of rank or person, and certainly without exposure to ad hominem attack (as in "That ... ? What would he know.")
My curiosity about the members of the Ruxted Group is of another order. They are posting here and elsewhere as an interest/advocacy group, and the identity of the members is relevant to show where they are coming from beyond mission statements. It's not a big deal, but it would be nice to know who is behind the collective identity. (I can play with Ted Ruxpin's name and come up with "Ruxted," so another identity for either Ted or the Ruxted Group might be in order.)