- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 410
Just to clarify something here, my statements are not here to bash or trivialise anyones contributions to the CF. We require CSS to do our jobs, they are an integral part of the team.
I'm saying that while you may have a 1 in 20 chance of becoming a casualty as a combat arms soldier outside the wire, it's probably more like 1 in 3000 for the guys inside the wire.
If we are going to be honest with potential recruits, current soldiers and their families, we owe it to them to make them realise that only a small fraction of troops deployed overseas have any contact with the enemy, and that this is completely intentional, acceptable and normal.
We are'nt doing anyone any favours creating any "mystique" around what trades and positions do what. Different jobs, different levels of risk.
I'm saying that while you may have a 1 in 20 chance of becoming a casualty as a combat arms soldier outside the wire, it's probably more like 1 in 3000 for the guys inside the wire.
If we are going to be honest with potential recruits, current soldiers and their families, we owe it to them to make them realise that only a small fraction of troops deployed overseas have any contact with the enemy, and that this is completely intentional, acceptable and normal.
We are'nt doing anyone any favours creating any "mystique" around what trades and positions do what. Different jobs, different levels of risk.
