SGT => CPL over Charges Laid for Incidents at Montreal, Rouyn-Noranda CFRCs

[Old Sweat]

I thought the comments were of a higher standard than the usual CBC or Globe and Mail ones in terms of clarity, brevity and general tone. A couple were downright funny.

 

[The Bread Guy]

I read the comments.

Am I bad?

Not at all - just more tolerant than I am if you read all the way through without at least a shake of the head.

 

[Haggis]

Not at all - just more tolerant than I am if you read all the way through without at least a shake of the head.

I never said this.  I just said I read them.  My co-workers could clearly tell that I was pissed at something, though.

 

[gcclarke]

According to the Sun (WARNING:  1)  the Sun takes what some might consider a typically Sun-ish approach to a story of women being asked to show their breasts, and 2)  don't read the comments):No mention of dismissal in the CM results, but I also couldn't find the decision the Sun piece quotes from, either, on the CMJ Decisions page.

Perhaps the talk of dismissal is in regards to the pending results of the obligatory Administrative Review (IAW DAOD 5019-2) that the member's file will under-go, as a result of his sexual misconduct (as outlined in DAOD 5019-5).

 

[The Bread Guy]

Perhaps the talk of dismissal is in regards to the pending results of the obligatory Administrative Review (IAW DAOD 5019-2) that the member's file will under-go, as a result of his sexual misconduct (as outlined in DAOD 5019-5).

Thanks very much for the ref - appreciated.

Then the story probably should have read "faces possible dismissal", since (as far as we know) there's been no finding in such a review.

 

[Jarnhamar]

I hope he gets punted from the forces. What a duisgusting breach of trust professionalisim and honour.

 

[gcclarke]

Thanks very much for the ref - appreciated.

Then the story probably should have read "faces possible dismissal", since (as far as we know) there's been no finding in such a review.

I suppose it might also be important to point out that the process of the review, and any accompanying documentation would also be protected information, and thus certainly not releasable to the press. Anyone not actively involved in the review process really shouldn't find out the findings of said review (or at least not until they notice that he either has or hasn't been kicked out).

I hope he gets punted from the forces. What a duisgusting breach of trust professionalisim and honour.

Agreed.