Fair. But both of those folks would be getting either SSMs or GSMs, not medals that signify geographic “boots on ground / air”.If people in Fla. can get medals for deployments so can Cyber Ops in direct support of missions.
Fair. But both of those folks would be getting either SSMs or GSMs, not medals that signify geographic “boots on ground / air”.If people in Fla. can get medals for deployments so can Cyber Ops in direct support of missions.
As long as folks are deployed full-time on named operations outside of the country (without family and F&E), medals such as the SSM are suitable. There's a variety of 'nice spots' around the globe that have qualified for the SSM-EXP....including, but not limited to, Jamaica, Malta, Cyprus, France, UK, Germany, Solomon Islands, Martinique, Belize, etc, etc.If people in Fla. can get medals for deployments so can Cyber Ops in direct support of missions.
I think therein lies the rub.As long as folks are deployed full-time on named operations outside of the country (without family and F&E), medals such as the SSM are suitable. There's a variety of 'nice spots' around the globe that have qualified for the SSM-EXP....including, but not limited to, Jamaica, Malta, Cyprus, France, UK, Germany, Solomon Islands, Martinique, Belize, etc, etc.
Perhaps the most odd example is that we have members posted OUTCAN to various NATO positions (including some HQs) for 3-4 years along with their families and F&E who qualify for the SSM-NATO.
Fair. But both of those folks would be getting either SSMs or GSMs, not medals that signify geographic “boots on ground / air”.
I think therein lies the rub.
The medal doesn’t denote being away from your family or risk/hazard. It denotes whether you served in an operation or not. If the folks in JFC Naples or wherever had their families with them, it doesn’t change the fact that they did a NATO job.
The DISTANTIA bar acknowledges that some operations are global and the effects don’t need to be from a specific location.
The question then becomes, do the Techs making the system work qualify?I believe the caveat is "on or in direct support of an operation".
It wouldn't be hard to argue Cyber Ops have a direct support role.
The question then becomes, do the Techs making the system work qualify?
What about the Techs maintaining the RPAS, or the IntO/Int Ops/Met Techs briefing the RPAS crews?
It will be interesting to see how this works out. I suspect it will create more issues than it solves.
Well, if the RPA was sent overseas for an operation, the Techs would be there too so that’s a no-brainer. As far as the Int folks and ATIS-y types, my guess would be that yes, they are also direct support. Probably also the Sqn admin/log folks too.The question then becomes, do the Techs making the system work qualify?
What about the Techs maintaining the RPAS, or the IntO/Int Ops/Met Techs briefing the RPAS crews?
It will be interesting to see how this works out. I suspect it will create more issues than it solves.
In the mid 2000s I worked at a job dealing with Outcan Operations. One Op I dealt with had members overseas and a clerk in Florida that was on a one year rotation. That clerk in Florida received the same op medal as the members in location on the op even though they were never there. No idea what the clerk did for them as everything I could think of was done by those members or staff in Ottawa.If people in Fla. can get medals for deployments so can Cyber Ops in direct support of missions.
I may be wrong on this, but do not the Americans have a differentiation between ribbons for accomplishments and those for actual decorations/medals? I made the near-fatal mistake once of teasing a Marine Corps Maj, asking if they were for filing, typing, etc - they were for a myriad of deployments into miserable places with combat ops. Took many 'beers of apology' to fix that... Met a USN LCdr who would wear different racks with different dress - asked him why and he said in the one order of dress, he wore all of his ribbons. In the more formal order, the ribbons present were only for actual medals.In the mid 2000s I worked at a job dealing with Outcan Operations. One Op I dealt with had members overseas and a clerk in Florida that was on a one year rotation. That clerk in Florida received the same op medal as the members in location on the op even though they were never there. No idea what the clerk did for them as everything I could think of was done by those members or staff in Ottawa.
I think both Dom Ops and Service to Canada is something to be recognized and have no issue for it be separate medals to distinguish between the two. Not really a fan of adding another bar to the SSM, more think the SSM should be geared towards outcan ops while dom ops has its own with maybe a number to indicate how many the member has participated in - 99 fits just as easy as 01, anything higher use an infinity symbol.
Absolutely do not want us to go to the American system of giving medals for everything. Talked to one gentleman with a chest of medals and when asked what they were for all I heard him mention was courses he had done. Think he might have mentioned a paper cut in there too but by then I had zoned out.
Absolutely do not want us to go to the American system of giving medals for everything. Talked to one gentleman with a chest of medals and when asked what they were for all I heard him mention was courses he had done. Think he might have mentioned a paper cut in there too but by then I had zoned out.
When she later had the secondary duty in her squadron of awards officer, she was particularly unimpressed with the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal (a result of Bush's thousand points of light) when it was introduced, and though she was required to processapplicationsrecommendations (self recommendations?) she refused to be considered for the award personally. One of the more stupid applications (according to her) was from a lieutenant whose "volunteer service" was arranging extra-curricular activities for a neighborhood group of home-schooled kids (the Lt's among them).
I believe that in the USN (not sure about the other services), you can just wear your “top 3” medals rather than the whole rack.I may be wrong on this, but do not the Americans have a differentiation between ribbons for accomplishments and those for actual decorations/medals? I made the near-fatal mistake once of teasing a Marine Corps Maj, asking if they were for filing, typing, etc - they were for a myriad of deployments into miserable places with combat ops. Took many 'beers of apology' to fix that... Met a USN LCdr who would wear different racks with different dress - asked him why and he said in the one order of dress, he wore all of his ribbons. In the more formal order, the ribbons present were only for actual medals.
Regardless - I am very much in favour of some sort of DOMOPS medal - whether it be an SSM, or something different. There is a distinct measure of risk, and mental health impact on quite a few of these - more so than some deployments for which other medals exist.
New NATO Vigilance medal coming out which seems like it'll replace the NATO SSM and drastically reduce the number of SSMs that are issued I imagine (if it's approved). Maybe a domestic bar for the SSM isn't such a bad call since it won't be nearly as common anymore.
The table seems to miss every SOVOP prior to the creation of the dotCOMs. The Swiss Air crash was another domestic operation.I was curious as to how many domestic operations were occurring in Canada. Some I've deployed onto with CAF staff present and I've heard of many others - mostly wildfire and flood responses via Operation LENTUS but spent some time to look up as many as I could locate:
View attachment 89064
Now I know I'm missing older deployments pre-2000. Locally about 15km from where I sit a CAF member was killed on wildfire response in the 1950's and there have been others over the years as well especially in the Search and Rescue field.
But overall it's been a busy couple of decades for the CAF and to share some persepective:
Here's the deployments by rough catagory:
View attachment 89058
And here's the deployments by Year:
View attachment 89059
Unfortunately I don't have access to the number of CAF personnel involved as not all public facing missions list the number of staff. Same with many missions not including details as to which province/territory was involved. Some were in the thousands of CAF members...others less than a dozen. But all were called out for specific taskings above and beyond regular training and garrison duties.
Revised for stupid spelling mistakes by author
foresterab
What’s this NATO vigilance medal?New NATO Vigilance medal coming out which seems like it'll replace the NATO SSM and drastically reduce the number of SSMs that are issued I imagine (if it's approved). Maybe a domestic bar for the SSM isn't such a bad call since it won't be nearly as common anymore.
It’s a new non-Article 5 medal which will replace SSM-NATO.What’s this NATO vigilance medal?