• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Sun Papers: CF AWOL Cases Up Since 9-11

Edward Campbell said:
Sadly, Staples is right.  DND funds and otherwise supports its own lobby group: The Conference of Defence Associations. 

You're right, CDA does receive grants from DND. Its all in CFAO 210-42 which deals with grants to military associations. I couldn't find anything about whether CDA still receives funding however. When Staples made the statement on the talk radio he didn't name anyone or organizations that received any DND funding; in effect tarring all defence analysts as having received funding from DND. AS for Cpl Boneca's father, yes, there was a PAFFO at the Boneca home. However, the way I understood it, Staples implied that DND had sent the PAFFO around to make sure that the Boneca family only made a statement supporting the military line.
 
Virtually all defence analysts in Canada receive direct or indirect government funding.  To the best of my knowledge all universities with Defence studies programs receive federal subsidies.  (See http://www.forces.gc.ca/admpol/eng/academic/sdf_e.htm for more information)

David Bercusson, Jack Granatstein et al receive indirect subsidies for the programs at their schools, plus occasional direct contracts from DND for specific studies they conduct.  I may not agree with the Polaris Institute, but I respect that they are not greasing their wheels with government's money.
 
>I may not agree with the Polaris Institute, but I respect that they are not greasing their wheels with government's money.

Certainly not DND's, and certainly not directly from any arm of government according to their own information on-line.  You'd have to trace the sources of contracts and grants from charitable agencies to find out whether any government money was flowing through or not.
 
I wonder if you would prefer that they got money from anyone but the Government of Canada; say the Government of Russia, perhaps?
 
I would not be at all surprised if the Govt. was funding Polaris it would not be the first time it suppported looby groups that are opposed to the Govt.. I seem to recall at one point they were even supporting a law suit against themselves........ go figure?
 
Wait...so this guy has only a B.Ed only? Whoa.

Does Mr. Staples have any NGO experience at least, like with MSF? Any research experience in defence other than within his "institute"? His poorly written backgrounder doesn't touch on any publications, etc.

Has anyone written to the press about this? Maybe it's time with hit him with an plain old-fashioned truthful info-op.
 
lol, we're trying.

I HAD written a piece about an address he made to parliament and other comments addressed to the media, but SOMEONE decided it wasn't good enough for the front pages and moved it...  >:( ;)

It can now be found http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/47452/post-413117.html#msg413117  here.

Basically I don't think one needs to look at his credentials to figure out he knows next to nothing about defence.



[Edit:  better link - direct to correct post.]
 
And now, from another part of the media herd, this time with a bit of context  :o  shared in accordance with the "fair dealing" provisions, Section 29, of the Copyright Act - http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/info/act-e.html#rid-3340

Diggers go AWOL 2500 times
Michael McKinnon, FOI editor, The Australian, 22 Jul 06
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19870406-31477,00.html

DEFENCE personnel have gone AWOL more than 2500 times in the past three years, with some soldiers failing to turn up for flights to East Timor and sailors missing as warships prepare to leave port.

Australian Defence Force documents reveal thousands of disciplinary breaches across the services. At least three personnel were jailed for being absent without leave and some disappeared for days at a time while on overseas deployment.

One soldier from Brisbane's Enoggera Barracks went missing for 67 days in late 2003, while a sailor late to his ship in Sydney was still found AWOL even though he was only two minutes late in boarding.

Among the worst cases, a Sydney-based ADF member who went missing for 13 days in February last year was eventually arrested by MPs and NSW police and held in custody as a flight risk because he was absent when already confined to base. A Canberra-based sailor went AWOL from his ship for 42 days over the 2004 Christmas-New Year period, while a sailor from Western Australia went AWOL for 32 days and 40 minutes.

The documents, obtained by The Weekend Australian under Freedom of Information laws, also reveal ADF personnel have failed to turn up for guard duty or attend training courses, with personnel as high as the rank of captain being charged with AWOL offences.

The documents show that while the vast majority of offences were committed by privates and seamen (1328), there were about 80 offences during the period by junior officers such as lieutenants and captains. Punishments for AWOL offences include severe reprimands, detention, extra duties, restriction of privileges or leave and fines.

Under the Defence Force Discipline Act, any ADF member absent without leave is guilty of an offence with a maximum punishment of 12 months' prison.

However, innocence can be established if an individual can prove it was due to circumstances beyond their control.

The documents also reveal numerous reports where alcohol consumption was cited as a factor behind the tardiness.
There were also three cases of soldiers missing flights for return to service in East Timor.

The ADF documents reveal that from January 2003 to May this year there were a total of 2516 AWOL convictions for offenders among the 51,813 serving personnel in the army, navy and air force. The vast majority of AWOLs occurred on Australian soil, with 140 overseas offences compared with 2222 in Australia during the same period.

The ADF documents show that of the 2362 proven offences, 840 involved personnel late by minutes, 1283 personnel late by hours and 298 offences where personnel were missing for days. The documents also reveal that 60 of the overseas offences involved personnel late by minutes, 77 offences involved personnel late by hours and two cases in which ADF members were absent without leave for days when working overseas.

ADF spokesman Brigadier Gus Gilmore said yesterday that the AWOL levels were "clearly a cause for concern".

"Any level of AWOLs would have a negative impact on efficiency," he said. "For that reason, even relatively small periods of absence can lead to disciplinary action."


 
The Polaris Institute. Ha. Staples. Ha.

Says it all, really, doesn't it? Wish I could have seen Staples on TV trying to BS about 3PPCLI's mission to Afgh. These people (and the lazy toads in the media who quote them...) never cease to amaze me.

Cheers
 
Back
Top