- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
There are cases like Bernardo and that jackass ex-colonel where the woodchipper would be the preferred option. Where the 'run of the mill' murderer gets involved is in the cut off. Which cases exactly should be capital ones and how certain should you be of guilt. In our system, guilty is guilty whether it were a tough and close decision or a slam dunk. It is nice when the idiot chooses to videotape everything, but not all of them are so stupid. We're all aware of high profile murder cases where the 'guilty' party spend years in jail before being found innocent. Olsen and Guy-Paul Morin would be judged equally if we choose the sexual exploitation and murder of children as our litmus test for execution. Russel Williams and David Milgaard would both be judged the same if it were to be sexual deviants who kill their victims.jollyjacktar said:I think it would be quite painless to sentence the truly dangerous to death as was earlier suggested, before it got derailed to include the run of the mill murderer by some here. Except for the die hard bleeding faint of heart I don't think you'd find too much sympathy among the Canadian populous for the likes Bernardo, Pickton, Olson et al getting their necks adjusted. And some, like me would be happy for them to be fed into a wood chipper, feet first. And as for cost, the sooner after the sentence the cheaper the cost to the state. The truly dangerous offenders out there will not be safely readmitted into society, nor I suggest will they find any worthwhile remorse of their crimes during a lengthy incarceration. So, what's the point/benefit of incarceration for these creatures?
Yes, there are plenty of wonderful places that choose to execute...North Korea, Cuba, China, United States (some), Uganda, Sudan, Saudi Arabia and a bunch of others. Missing from this list would be the majority of countries most like our own.
