• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

To take part, gun owners will register their firearms online. Once registered they turn the firearms in and then wait and hope to be paid.

The problem is once you register your firearm you're obligated to turn it in. You. may get fair value for it, $300 for it, or the pot of money runs out and you get fuck all.

That money is going to go fast. There's around 95,000 AR15s registered in Canada. At $1800 a pop that's $171 million out of $700m
There's a hell of a lot more now-illegal long rifles out there. I've seen estimates at a 1:10 to 1:20 ratio of Ar15 vs other banned semi-autos.
 

To take part, gun owners will register their firearms online. Once registered they turn the firearms in and then wait and hope to be paid.

The problem is once you register your firearm you're obligated to turn it in. You. may get fair value for it, $300 for it, or the pot of money runs out and you get fuck all.

That money is going to go fast. There's around 95,000 AR15s registered in Canada. At $1800 a pop that's $171 million out of $700m
There's a hell of a lot more now-illegal long rifles out there. I've seen estimates at a 1:10 to 1:20 ratio of Ar15 vs other banned semi-autos.

I talked to a person who took part in this. Big LPC type; very pro Carney. Claims he got 3000$ instantly per rifle. If I remember he gave in 2 or 3.

I just expressed that I was sad that we lived in a country that made him turn in his legally obtained property without having committed a crime.
 
I talked to a person who took part in this. Big LPC type; very pro Carney. Claims he got 3000$ instantly per rifle. If I remember he gave in 2 or 3.

I just expressed that I was sad that we lived in a country that made him turn in his legally obtained property without having committed a crime.
Interesting point. So of the 25 turned in, he was 2-3 of those. So not even 25 different people participated. I wonder how many people vice firearms participated?
 
Interesting point. So of the 25 turned in, he was 2-3 of those. So not even 25 different people participated. I wonder how many people vice firearms participated?

I will be honest, he is so biased in his support for the LPC and PMMC, and has so much disdain for what's left of the Canadian firearms community I wouldn't put lying past him. I didn't witness anything... Just what he told me.

But what I am earing through sources up in the cape is that that around 10 people took part.
 
I just expressed that I was sad that we lived in a country that made him turn in his legally obtained property without having committed a crime.
Imagine seizing everyone's vehicles because a few drive drunk and kill people, or some murderous bastard deliberately uses a vehicle as a weapon.
 
Imagine seizing everyone's vehicles because a few drive drunk and kill people, or some murderous bastard deliberately uses a vehicle as a weapon.

One could argue that precedence exists. I wonder what percentage of cars in Canadian are used to commit crimes vs what percentage of firearms are... Might be an interesting stat...
 
Looking briefly at some of the values, a few rifles are going for much more than what the standard rate was even a few years ago.

For example a AG-42b is valued at 2100$ on that chart which I have never seen sell for more than 1500$ (10 years ago it was around 400$). Or a PTRD which is 5230$ which I had seen for sale about 10 years ago at around 1k. Or the SVT-40 which is 2100$ when a few year ago they were selling for 200$.

Might be a few people taking advantage of the prices just to profit.
 
Looking briefly at some of the values, a few rifles are going for much more than what the standard rate was even a few years ago.

For example a AG-42b is valued at 2100$ on that chart which I have never seen sell for more than 1500$ (10 years ago it was around 400$). Or a PTRD which is 5230$ which I had seen for sale about 10 years ago at around 1k. Or the SVT-40 which is 2100$ when a few year ago they were selling for 200$.

Might be a few people taking advantage of the prices just to profit.
And some are below what they cost 13 years ago...
 
Imagine seizing everyone's vehicles because a few drive drunk and kill people, or some murderous bastard deliberately uses a vehicle as a weapon.
Eventually vehicles will all be self-drive and controlled by software written to satisfy legislated guidelines and who knows what kinds of fuel- or mileage-based rationing. Widespread cameras and recognition software that can interpret bodily actions as well as mere facial recognition and tip police to the early onset of some kind of anti-social behaviour are a no-brainer. Cash will be eliminated, and gradually additional transaction information (nature of business, nature of purchase, location, etc) will be collected and sifted by AI tools.

At each point, the usual excuse will be advanced: "we already do all this other stuff and the world didn't end; what is one thing more?" ("Frog boiling".) All only if people keep permitting it. It might sound absurd, but here are a couple of things: all the tech for the short list above already exists, governments are already musing about some of it (eg. elimination of cash); and there is no reason to expect the people nibbling at liberty in pursuit of safety to suddenly say, "Well, that's enough; we've achieved everything we wanted." And attributing pursuit of safety is the charitable view. Some people really do like to be in control, and can be quite iron-fisted and unpleasant about it. Those who doubt me should examine the chickenshit politics of university faculties; strata and other ownership councils; clubs and other voluntary associations.
 
Imagine seizing everyone's vehicles because a few drive drunk and kill people, or some murderous bastard deliberately uses a vehicle as a weapon.
A better metaphor would be motorcycles, especially sports bikes.

"Why do you need a sport bike? You can't legally go above 110kph (and illegally but acceptably above 130kph), so why do you need a bike that can go 300kph and accelerate to half that in about 2 seconds? They aren't even practical! That vehicle is an unnecessary danger to society. Give it to us."
 
A better metaphor would be motorcycles, especially sports bikes.

"Why do you need a sport bike? You can't legally go above 110kph (and illegally but acceptably above 130kph), so why do you need a bike that can go 300kph and accelerate to half that in about 2 seconds? They aren't even practical! That vehicle is an unnecessary danger to society. Give it to us."
Funny you should mention that. In Manitoba if a car hits a motorcycle and its the cars fault then guess which fund pays for it? The Motorcycle fund. If a motorbike hits the car ...well guess which fund pays.

A lot of people here only ride their bikes occasionally and insure them for that time.
 
And some are below what they cost 13 years ago...
100%. I stand to lose a fair bit with this law as none of mine if turned in will have a positive return.

For example AR-15 uppers they refuse to pay for. Thats a lot of cash for many people right there.
 
Québec police have signed on to the gun grab for $12M. You'll likely see very high compliance in QC due to them having a functioning and fairly up-to-date long gun registry. But $12M won't go far.
 
A better metaphor would be motorcycles, especially sports bikes.

"Why do you need a sport bike? You can't legally go above 110kph (and illegally but acceptably above 130kph), so why do you need a bike that can go 300kph and accelerate to half that in about 2 seconds? They aren't even practical! That vehicle is an unnecessary danger to society. Give it to us."
Makes one think of 3 wheelers in the 80's. Banned for manufacture and commercial sale to stop further proliferation, but not confiscated, and the secondary market was allowed to continue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eventually vehicles will all be self-drive and controlled by software written to satisfy legislated guidelines and who knows what kinds of fuel- or mileage-based rationing. Widespread cameras and recognition software that can interpret bodily actions as well as mere facial recognition and tip police to the early onset of some kind of anti-social behaviour are a no-brainer. Cash will be eliminated, and gradually additional transaction information (nature of business, nature of purchase, location, etc) will be collected and sifted by AI tools.

At each point, the usual excuse will be advanced: "we already do all this other stuff and the world didn't end; what is one thing more?" ("Frog boiling".) All only if people keep permitting it. It might sound absurd, but here are a couple of things: all the tech for the short list above already exists, governments are already musing about some of it (eg. elimination of cash); and there is no reason to expect the people nibbling at liberty in pursuit of safety to suddenly say, "Well, that's enough; we've achieved everything we wanted." And attributing pursuit of safety is the charitable view. Some people really do like to be in control, and can be quite iron-fisted and unpleasant about it. Those who doubt me should examine the chickenshit politics of university faculties; strata and other ownership councils; clubs and other voluntary associations.

There was a debate a few years ago on CBC radio about whether self driving cars should be programmed to have ethics.

"To present a sample scenario: if a driverless car with four passengers is heading down the road, and a child runs out in front of the car, should the car swerve into an adjacent wall, likely injuring the car's passengers? Or should the car hit the child, which would injure fewer people?"

 
To take part, gun owners will register their firearms online. Once registered they turn the firearms in and then wait and hope to be paid.

The problem is once you register your firearm you're obligated to turn it in. You. may get fair value for it, $300 for it, or the pot of money runs out and you get fuck all.

That money is going to go fast. There's around 95,000 AR15s registered in Canada. At $1800 a pop that's $171 million out of $700m
There's a hell of a lot more now-illegal long rifles out there. I've seen estimates at a 1:10 to 1:20 ratio of Ar15 vs other banned semi-autos.
You won't get market value. In fact, I'll be surprised if you get anything. Most of the money will be used to pay retailers for their stock. Giving them a list of your holdings is an indication that you probably shouldn't own guns.........or anything sharp. Just another back door registration scheme. One they already tried and failed at.
 
100%. I stand to lose a fair bit with this law as none of mine if turned in will have a positive return.

For example AR-15 uppers they refuse to pay for. Thats a lot of cash for many people right there.

I have no uppers. Or guts. I have registrations for stripped AR lowers only.
 
When the time comes for my guns to get picked up, they'll have to come and get them with a fork-lift and truck.

They will be embedded in a concrete filled tri-wall mixed in with rebar/junk/etc. There will be a PVC tube heat welded to each receiver showing the S/N, but the rest of the receiver will be deeply embedded in about 2 tons of concrete.

No good to me? No good to them either. Get your jackhammer out MFs.
 
Back
Top