• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

Mea culpa. The point still stands though.

Why is LE issued firearms that are designed to kill the most amount of people in the shortest amount of time?

Because sometimes, that's our job.

There is more than one name on the RCMP Memorial in Regina there because they were hopelessly outgunned in the rolling gun fight.
 
Because sometimes, that's our job.

There is more than one name on the RCMP Memorial in Regina there because they were hopelessly outgunned in the rolling gun fight.

I am referring to trudeaus reasoning for banning them. I doubt LE were issued them to kill the most amount of people in the least amount of time as the government professes that is the only reason for banning them.

I am not putting any blame on LE. I hold the deepest respect for anyone in uniform. I'm pointing out the double standard of the current government.

Perhaps not very eloquently though.
 
Semi autos are no more dangerous than that .22 Cooey bolt gun in the corner. They are inanimate until a lunatic or untrained person picks it up and starts fucking with it. The operator is the dangerous portion of the equation.

Yes they are. Take some disgruntled young adult who's got an infatuation with mass killings and a beef with the world. He can do a lot more damage and keep LE at bay more effectively with an AR-10 than he could we a Cooey.
 
Yes they are. Take some disgruntled young adult who's got an infatuation with mass killings and a beef with the world. He can do a lot more damage and keep LE at bay more effectively with an AR-10 than he could we a Cooey.
I would be impressed if he had an AR-10, not exactly common.

Quite the epidemic we are having with long guns of all types

1769129342597.png
 
Back
Top