- Reaction score
- 1,531
- Points
- 1,260
RocketRichard said:*Quote of personal attack has been removed*
Sigh, this adds to decorum here in this forum does it not?
Maybe that's why it's in Radio Chatter?
Edited for continuity.
RocketRichard said:*Quote of personal attack has been removed*
Sigh, this adds to decorum here in this forum does it not?
Agreed MM, most appropriate forum for the discussion but the inappropriate language and vitriol not so much.mariomike said:Maybe that's why it's in Radio Chatter?
George Wallace said:I beg to differ. He has made his views on Canada well known in the past, and his belief that Quebec is the only province of significance. The whole presentation, with him coming out as MC at times, made me have even more doubts about his actual capabilities other than that of a thespian. He has no real substance, repeating ad nauseum the same lines over and over again how he was elected to help the Middle Class and raise the Taxes on the top 1%. He has done nothing but play the "blame game" or take credit for any good that a previous Government initiated. If you dissect the performances on the Hill, you can see that he has also inserted his "Quota" system in the performances and participants. (I was surprised to see the first four Mounties walk on stage to be females, and then noticed that 50% of the total were women. Nothing against women, but it does fall in line with his "filling Quotas".) I truly believe that he is in no way, shape or form, a "statesman", nor in any way a "leader"; even if he has been elected to that position.
Here is one more of his "dumb other things that Trudeau has said" (Quote of David Akin) from Tele Quebec in 2010: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1yCIHMJwY
George Wallace said:I beg to differ. He has made his views on Canada well known in the past, and his belief that Quebec is the only province of significance. The whole presentation, with him coming out as MC at times, made me have even more doubts about his actual capabilities other than that of a thespian. He has no real substance, repeating ad nauseum the same lines over and over again how he was elected to help the Middle Class and raise the Taxes on the top 1%. He has done nothing but play the "blame game" or take credit for any good that a previous Government initiated. If you dissect the performances on the Hill, you can see that he has also inserted his "Quota" system in the performances and participants. (I was surprised to see the first four Mounties walk on stage to be females, and then noticed that 50% of the total were women. Nothing against women, but it does fall in line with his "filling Quotas".) I truly believe that he is in no way, shape or form, a "statesman", nor in any way a "leader"; even if he has been elected to that position.
Here is one more of his "dumb other things that Trudeau has said" (Quote of David Akin) from Tele Quebec in 2010: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1yCIHMJwY
RocketRichard said:*Quote of personal attack removed*
Sigh, this adds to decorum here in this forum does it not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Enjoy your retirement.recceguy said:People are allowed to voice their opinion, go check the Charter, while it lasts. If your delicate sensibilities were offended, that's unfortunate. The current occupier of the PM's chair is not ptotected from vitriol or dislike. You can respect the office without supporting the person. Trudeau's actions since the election are nothing short of disgusting. His arrogant attitude and spending are strictly for his own benefit and ego extention at the expense of our country's taxpayer and Charter Rights.
If someone wants to call him a massive piece of crap, that is their right and perogative. He's a high profile narcissist, and as a public figure and, supposedly, our country's navigator, that makes him open to critisism. If someone wants to critisise him and call him a spineless dick, well, that's just too bad. That is their thoughts and opinions and hold no other place than right next to your own thoughts and opinions.
RocketRichard said:Enjoy your retirement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RocketRichard said:Perhaps so, but then those Albertans need to chill out then.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trudeau's actions since the election are nothing short of disgusting. His arrogant attitude and spending are strictly for his own benefit and ego extention at the expense of our country's taxpayer and Charter Rights.
If someone wants to call him a massive piece of shit, that is their right and perogative. He's a high profile narcissist, and as a public figure and, supposedly, our country's navigator, that makes him open to critisism.
Stephen Walt, "The World Is Even Less Stable Than It Looks: Chaos is spreading – and that’s even before getting to America’s lack of competent leadership." Foreign Policy, 26 June 2017
These developments would be worrisome enough if we had a surplus of gifted and farsighted strategists at the helm of the world’s major powers, the modern-day equivalents of Franklin Roosevelt, George Marshall, Konrad Adenauer, or Charles de Gaulle. Heck, at this point I’d take Maggie Thatcher, Zbigniew Brzezinski, James Baker, Jacques Chirac, and any number of past leaders who made some big mistakes but also got a number of big things right and did not enter public service largely either to fleece the public or to gratify their own egos.
But the United States is determined not to be beaten in this competition of political incompetence. If the consequences were not potentially so dire, the Trump administration’s collective ineptitude would be a great source of comic relief. I’m not talking about controversial policy decisions about which reasonable people might disagree (such as the pros and cons of giving regional military commanders greater authority over operations in their respective areas), I’m talking about foreign-policy actions that seem inspired more by the Keystone Cops or Three Stooges than by Clausewitz, Kennan, or Sun Tzu.
LINK [The Trump-bashing is just a small portion of the article, by the way. For those who don't shun reading, it may be worth a look].
Journeyman said:The joys of being an ideologue, I guess. You don't have to actually address specific policies and offer a rational counter-view, which rationally considers the politicians' constraints, restraints, knock-on effects, costs/benefits, etc.... You just have to name-call, even using the same words as the other guy, so that the trash-talk is pretty much identical; if you didn't have the politician's name, you'd never know who the 'complete idiot' is.
:dunno:
Trudeau (Great Satan); Butts (Puppet-master); Trump (the envy of all 'right thinking people')
Trump (Great Satan); Brannon (Puppet-master); Trudeau (the envy of all 'right thinking people')
???
Edit: typo :-[