• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Modern Dilemma - The Sophistry of Process vs Socratic Inquiry

Kirkhill

Puggled and Wabbit Scot.
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
12,897
Points
1,160

"the Sophists were more interested in teaching their pupils how to “win” arguments and become famous than in cultivating wisdom.

'Their services were sold to young noblemen and politicians who wanted to “persuade” their citizens. An orator, they thought, “does not need to know what is really just”, nor what is “really good or noble”. Persuasion, on their account, “comes from what seems to be true, not from the truth.”"

....

"This was not, for Socrates, merely a rival approach to truth. It was more serious than that. What was at stake in Athens was the question of whether public life ought to be anchored to anything real or whether it would dissolve into a competition of performances.

"Western civilisation is the inheritor of the Socratic tradition which insists that reality is more important than appearances."

....

Performace art. Virtue signalling. Sophistry.

The opposite of the enlightenment sought by David Hume and Adam Smith.

We would now rather be seen to bend the knee to settled truths than engage in disputatious science.
 
Back
Top