- Reaction score
- 15,902
- Points
- 1,160
My bad, I thought they had gone straight to Shilo in 1994.A city of a million people that’s still affordable is god forsaken? It’s not like it’s Shilo.

My bad, I thought they had gone straight to Shilo in 1994.A city of a million people that’s still affordable is god forsaken? It’s not like it’s Shilo.
Well they probably got two of the best postings the army has, my sympathy is limited.Most of them hated Calgary (then Edmonton) with a passion.
Personally Ive always found Calgary overrated. A sea of highways and far less to do culturally than Edmonton. Clean and nice zoo though.OK. I understand Edmonton. But I moved west from Ontario and thought I had found paradise on earth when I hit Calgary. And both the Strats and Picklies were in town at the time.
And I were just recently out of university at the time.
In the immortal words of Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie, "Alberta doesn't suck, but Calgary does."Personally Ive always found Calgary overrated. A sea of highways and far less to do culturally than Edmonton. Clean and nice zoo though.
The joke amongst my buddies there is thr best part of Calgary is leaving (a couple hours West to the mountains).
I was stationed there with 3 PPCLI from '75-'80 and I really enjoyed the downtown area. Except for the part in the evenings they rolled up the sidewalks after 2100 hrs.
IIRC, they mostly went to Fort Lewis. Or tramped around cut blocks on Vancouver Island. Locally: Rocky Point, Mary Hill, Albert Head, Royal Roads and Heels Range all provided small scale training areas.Where did they do field training? I've been out that way and I don't recall any training area...
Yep!IIRC, they mostly went to Fort Lewis. Or tramped around cut blocks on Vancouver Island. Locally: Rocky Point, Mary Hill, Albert Head, Royal Roads and Heels Range all provided small scale training areas.
I'm a bit gob smacked - the CBC is running a story that is positive overall on the F35 and highlights Canada's contribution into producing them.
Think F-35 fighter jets are all-American? Canada actually plays a major role in production
Lockheed Martin says about 30 companies in Canada are currently involved in F-35 program
According to McIntosh, that figure contains about $3.2 million Cdn ($2.28 million US) worth of parts.
100-plus companies in Canada have contributed to program
A Lockheed Martin test pilot who accompanied CBC on the tour was able to point out some of the Canadian parts on the jets themselves.
At each station, there's a screen that indicates the country that has purchased that specific jet and what percentage of it is completed, along with other key information. CBC saw one of the 16 jets slated for Canada, which was in the beginning stages of assembly.
Canada is one of eight partner nations from the program's inception, and a member of the joint executive steering board, meaning that Canada has had a seat at the table and has been involved in the decision process for major aspects of the program.
In a statement to CBC News, Lockheed Martin said, "The global F-35 program bolsters an allied defence industrial base, with projected economic benefits commensurate with a country’s program of record. The projected economic benefit of $15.5B CAD is commensurate with Canada’s program of record for 88 jets."
Lockheed Martin says about 30 companies in Canada are currently involved in the F-35 program, employing about 2,000 Canadians. With a natural ebb and flow of contracts, the defence contractor says anywhere between 30 to 35 companies in Canada — though not necessarily Canadian-owned — participate in the program.
For example, a company in Delta, B.C., makes a part of the foldable wing for jets that land on aircraft carriers that aren’t part of Canada’s military.
Another contribution comes from the picturesque town of Lunenburg, N.S., which houses a factory belonging to French aerospace and defence company Stelia. It's just minutes away from Lunenburg’s colourful harbour, famously known as the home of the Bluenose, the racing schooner pictured on the Canadian dime.
Also involved in the F-35 program is Christie Digital, a projector and LED display company located in Kitchener, Ont., a well-known hub for engineering and innovation. The company landed a contract with Lockheed Martin just last year to help build the next generation of F-35 flight simulators. Christie supplies the micro LED tiles for Lockheed Martin's Amorphic Appearance Zero-Projector (AMAZE) visual display system.
It’s a 360-dome cockpit simulation that allows pilots to train in a safe, low-cost environment. According to Harminder Banwait, director of business development at Christie Digital, it will enhance night-training capabilities.
“I got a lot of pride in working with the team,” said Banwait. “It's a lot of satisfaction for me personally, that I've had a long career so far, and to be able to deliver something that is unique and to be the first to market is really rewarding for me.”
I can't help but think that this is reason as well. We truly need to move forward on this issue asap and move on to the Sub purchase next. Carney is in SK in 5 days.I take this as good news. Good news that the government has probably decided to proceed with the full F-35 and needs the CBC to start the positive info ops campaign so the GoC don't look too stupid over the delays and dithering and ultimately choosing it.
That article has a very weird title, worded like we've decided to already cut the F-35 deal when that is not the case.On the other hand....
![]()
Canada Plans Cut to F-35 Orders to Hedge Towards Lightweight Gripen: Is a Mixed Fleet a Better Option?
The administration of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is considering deep cuts to its planned order for 88 F-35A fifth generation fighters, with the intention ofmilitarywatchmagazine.com
Sweden just took delivery of its first E-type and inked a deal with Ukraine for 100 to 150 with co-production.
Unless the Ukrainians get ahold of the production lines?That article has a very weird title, worded like we've decided to already cut the F-35 deal when that is not the case.
Those numbers for Ukraine are a joke considering how slow Gripen E/F production has been, with Sweden just receiving its first aircraft now. It is likely going to take them like a decade plus to deliver that kind of fleet.
I am unaware of any Ukrainian domestic production lines that could take on an advanced western fighter like the Gripen E, especially with a vast majority of its components are imported from various partners abroad. As far as Saab's domestic capability, their supply chains and production capacity is woefully inadequate to meet that Ukrainian order on anything approaching a reasonable timeframe. They have been locked into a fairly small production tempo since its inception and their repeated export failures have not helped the situation over the years.Unless the Ukrainians get ahold of the production lines?
That article is AI slop.On the other hand....
![]()
Canada Plans Cut to F-35 Orders to Hedge Towards Lightweight Gripen: Is a Mixed Fleet a Better Option?
The administration of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is considering deep cuts to its planned order for 88 F-35A fifth generation fighters, with the intention ofmilitarywatchmagazine.com
Sweden just took delivery of its first E-type and inked a deal with Ukraine for 100 to 150 with co-production.
Yes.Is Canada part of those 28?
No.Is it all of those 28?
Yes.maybe we are getting some of lot 17?
I thought a Sqn was 12, but I am likely wrong. I have no idea about the number 88, I suspect minimum number to meet essential requirements and cost was a major factor in coming to that number, but again I have no insight.
Squadrons are generally 12, but they have made ‘Super Squadrons’ of 18 and 24 at some locations.
No idea why the numbers fluctuate. Nor was it limited to F-35A airframes.
Note that the requirement is for 240 combat-coded F-22s. In order to maintain that many fighters constantly in a combat-ready condition and able to deploy on a wartime mission, the Air Force needs more F-22s for other needs. The question is: How many
The Air Force has analytic formulas for determining the answer. Here they are:
- For training, 25 percent of the combat-coded force, or 60 more fighters.
- For test purposes, five percent of the total of combat-coded and training aircraft, or 15 more fighters.
- For backup inventory, 10 percent of the combat-coded, training, and test aircraft, or 32 more fighters.
- For attrition reserve, 10 percent of everything above, or 34 more fighters.
Yes, giving credit where credit is due…PAK ran a very well-synchronized JADC2 assault on the IAF forces, including having a Saab Global-Eye radar-equipped AEE plane both painting the Indian Rafales while the PAF J-10s ran their radars in Rx-mode only, basically guiding them and their PL-15 missiles onto the IAF Rafales using semi-active fire control methods (like earlier AIM-120 Sparrow missiles). The Rafales only ‘saw’ the PAK AEW radar plane from further away and didn’t take any defensive posture for other threats in their airspace. Indian fighter pilots and C2 were arrogant and *they paid for it. It was a BLOS/BVR engagement and theIAF wasn’t using anywhere near the capabilities of the Rafale. I bet you if the IAF had been flying F-35s, they also would have had one or two shot down. China….err Pakistan won that engagement hands down.
Agreed.
The 'old' number of 88 airframes was agreed upon in the 'old world', pre-Trump and 'pre-2%, moving to 3.5%. I'm in the camp that when the numbers come out it will be north of 88.
Geography and Canadians priority for social safety nets over national defense. $100 Billion for war planes to kill babies* while your healthcare is on the brink of collapse doesn't look good in the headlines, and at the polls.
*average perception of fighter jets to the canadian public.
Anyways I wonder what the Air Force types would think of stagin our F35s out of the Baltics as part of our forward presence until we get our house in order vis a vis security. We could even ask regular BAP participants to instead subsidize the cost while we held a multi year mission, and cycle pilots through that Sqn as they come out of training.
Except bases in the Baltics may be certified before our own...Difficult. I don't think people understand the handover process involved. Before the first squadron leaves the US, the American program office has to certify everything. The infrastructure. The training. The networks. The maintenance program. Everything. Putting them in the Baltics first adds complications.
