- Reaction score
- 41,987
- Points
- 1,210
Is this a future fighter thread or a Cyclone thread?Imagine if the prototype had performed as well as the pretty future pictures….

Is this a future fighter thread or a Cyclone thread?Imagine if the prototype had performed as well as the pretty future pictures….
defence-industry.eu
There is some conjecture that the prototypes never really got tested.Imagine if the prototype had performed as well as the pretty future pictures….
Boeing had way too many irons in the fire at that point in time to do much.Boeing also had the potential to be better at mass production than Lockheed.
We may never know on the F-47 either.In the end, we'll never know.
If I recall correctly, the prototype acquired the nickname Monica Lewinski.Y'know,
A deep thought part of me wondered a while back if the X-32 was really all that bad...
The funny chin scoop and Delta wing was not going to be how the aircraft would look in the final design form.
If Boeing had actually won, they'd have had separate tail plane, and a nicer looking ventral intake.
Boeing also had the potential to be better at mass production than Lockheed.
In the end, we'll never know.

Yeah, if they made a demo team fly them they could have been the “Blue Dresses”….
If they just moved that intake back a metre or so… voila F16XL
Like an F-16 times two. An F-32.If they just moved that intake back a metre or so… voila F16XL
Next step: Canadian MSM catching up a bit with, "International news media have reported for months that Ottawa is poised to sign (on) ..."TWZ also has an article on Canada and GCAP:
![]()
Canada Throws A Curveball As It Signals Interest In Joining GCAP Sixth-Gen Fighter Program
The move comes as Ottawa weighs splitting its fighter fleet while broadening defense partnerships beyond the U.S., but timing is an issue. The move comes as Ottawa weighs splitting its future fighter fleet while broadening its defense partnerships beyond the United States.www.twz.com
That looks like the bastard love child between a F-22 and a A-7The proposed production variant looked better.
View attachment 101300
View attachment 101301
View attachment 101302
Grand of you to think it rates a pair…Twin Otter with a pair of C6 in a cupola.
What? Sopwith Camels not good enough for you?Twin Otter with a pair of C6 in a cupola.
One manufactured in Quebec, one in Ontario. Obviously.Grand of you to think it rates a pair…
One manufactured in Quebec, one in Ontario. Obviously.
The Swedish company Saab may have speculated that its business partner Bombardier could assemble its Gripen fighters in Canada if the federal government gave it the mandate to renew part or all of its CF-18 fleet. But Bombardier would gain absolutely nothing, quite the contrary. "We already have our hands full," agrees its CEO, Éric Martel.
Bombardier has left the door open to its partner Saab, with whom it has very successfully developed the Global Eye mission aircraft, but Éric Martel confirms that Bombardier would gain nothing by simply assembling aircraft for Saab, without any other added value.
The company, which employs 19,000 people worldwide, including 12,000 in Canada, faces the retirement of several hundred workers each year and will even host a branch of the École nationale de l'aéronautique in its facilities in the borough of Saint-Laurent in order to train future employees that it hopes to retain.
"Orders for the Global Eye are going very well, we have signed with France, NATO has committed to buying up to ten aircraft, Canada up to six. All NATO countries must increase their military spending, we can take advantage of it," says the CEO.
Rather than planning the assembly of a few dozen Gripen fighters, Bombardier is planning to open a new plant where it will do the electronic wrapping of the Global Eye and the installation of radars, which is normally done by its partner Saab in Sweden.
"We will first order aircraft for Canada and then we will be able to export the Global Eye with the contract with NATO," says Éric Martel.
Bombardier must also not alienate the United States, which remains its main market. If the Saint-Laurent company starts assembling fighters and takes the contract away from Lockheed Martin, Donald Trump could very naturally decide to impose juicy punitive tariffs on the business jets that the company sells in the United States.
