• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Sandbox and Areas Reports Thread April 2010

  • Thread starter Thread starter GAP
  • Start date Start date
Articles found April 21, 2010

'Model' Canadian village handed over to U.S. in Afghanistan
By Ethan Baron, Canwest News ServiceApril 20, 2010
Article Link

DEH-E-BAGH, Afghanistan — Canada's highly praised "model village" in Dand district is being handed over to U.S. army control, as Canadian combat troops move to volatile Panjwaii district.

The American surge of thousands more soldiers into Afghanistan is enabling Canadian battle troops to leave Dand for Panjwaii, where the Taliban are firmly entrenched just west of the Canadian front lines and NATO's upcoming Kandahar province offensive is expected to be especially violent.

"The influx of troops is allowing Canada to better concentrate its forces to really saturate one district," said Canadian Forces Maj. Mark Popov, commander of the outgoing soldiers in Deh-e-Bagh and the handful of other Dand outposts. "There are still a lot of areas in Panjwaii where the insurgents operate freely. And there are areas of Panjwaii where unfortunately some pretty hard combat operations will be needed to clear them out."

In Dand, development and governance-building work by the Canadian International Development Agency and the Foreign Affairs Department will continue under U.S. protection after the combat soldiers leave.

"The civilian contributions to the stabilization effort in Dand remain the same," said Ben Rowswell, the Representative of Canada in Kandahar.

The Canadian military's civil-military co-operation officers, construction corps and police trainers will also continue to operate in Dand.
More on link
 
Articles found April 22, 2010

War-zone ethics
Article Link
April 21, 2010  - Posted by Dana Lacey 

AP war correspondent Christopher Torchia, in Afghanistan, writes about fears, thrills and the ethics of embedded reporting.

Torchia wrote a long, personal note about his experiences--and the ethical questions that arise in the day-to-day dangers of life with the military.

"All around, men roared and rifles thudded. Sprawled in the earth in an open field, an American soldier to the left handed me a wounded man's ammunition belt. Even as Taliban bullets whipped overhead, I thought about professional codes of conduct. Carry the belt? Or not?

I was a journalist, not a soldier. My job was to observe without bias, not take part. Yet surely it was a time for instincts rather than circumspection; a time for decisions geared to survival.
In four weeks of reporting on the war in Afghanistan as a journalist embedded with the U.S. military, I found many such troubling questions about my role — and about why I was there in the first place.

So raw and instantaneous, combat inspires introspection. The premise that war exposes the essential nature of people is hard to dispute, once you have witnessed it. Centuries of literature attest to its magnetism. Combat is the most elemental act, and the most intricate. For all its spectacular horrors, it will never lack an audience.

Most spectators feed their fascination from a safe perch — in front of a television screen, or in a movie theater, or with books and games. For journalists, the questions begin with the decision to leave home and head into a combat zone. They have the choice, unlike many soldiers who accept grave risk as the institutional trade-off in a military career that can provide education, stability and adventure.

"Are you thrill-seekers?" a military medic asked Associated Press photographer Pier Paolo Cito and me after we climbed into a Stryker infantry vehicle for the first time.
More on link

Safety of our troops should top prisoner rights
  Article Link
By Stanley Taube, Special to The ProvinceApril 22, 2010

For several months, the federal Conservative government has come under criticism for the treatment of Afghans who are captured or "detained" by Canadian Forces.

These detainees are usually handed over to Afghan authorities. The allegations are that we are careless and have little or no regard as to how the detainees are subsequently treated. Many have apparently been treated poorly.

For some, this seems like an Alice in Wonderland scenario. We have sent military forces to Afghanistan to wage war on terrorists. Surely the object of waging war is to win the war. You don't go to war to reinforce national standards of morality or decency.

Naturally, it would be preferable to conduct war on a level of impeccable morality. Who wouldn't like it to be that way? Stretching back to the late 1800s, there have been treaties and protocols collectively called the Geneva Convention, which set out rules for the conduct of war. But the growing scale and changing nature of war have made following those rules difficult, if not impossible.

The two major world wars of the last century represented the breakdown of wartime morality.
More on link

Canadians encouraged Afghan Army to take prisoners: Semrau court martial

  Article Link
By Andrew Duffy, The Ottawa CitizenApril 19, 2010

Canadian soldiers embedded with Afghan National Army forces encouraged them to take possession of their own detainees rather than put them in Canadian control, a court martial has heard.

Warrant Officer Merlin Longaphie said that members of the Canadian Operational Mentor and Liaison Team (OMLT) were not ordered to avoid taking prisoners.

“But we were to encourage the Afghan National Army to take possession of them, rather than us,” he testified Monday.

The Canadian mentoring teams were too small to handle Afghan detainees, he said, but would make an exception if it involved a high value target.

Longaphie was part of a four-man mentoring team led by Captain Robert Semrau, 36, who faces court martial for second-degree murder.

The prosecution alleges that Semrau shot and killed a severely wounded Taliban fighter during an operation in Afghanistan’s Helmand Province on Oct. 19, 2008.

Semrau, a father of two young children, has pleaded not guilty to four charges stemming from the incident.

It is the prosecution’s theory that Semrau shot the disarmed Taliban insurgent as a battlefield mercy killing.
More on link

  Too obese for battle?
Article Link
A group of retired military officers says 27 percent of young Americans are too fat to serve. Are lousy school lunches threatening our national security?
posted on April 21, 2010, at 1:31 PM

How serious is this problem?
According to military recruiters, 48,000 would-be enlistees were rejected solely for being overweight between 2005 and 2009. Also, about 12,000 soldiers leave the U.S. military prematurely each year because they can't pass the annual physical fitness test. Retired Navy Rear Adm. James Barnett Jr., a Mission: Readiness spokesperson, says that our national security in 2030 is dependent on reversing childhood obesity trends now.

What does Mission: Readiness propose we do?
The organization wants Congress to improve school lunches and pull all junk food and soft drinks out of schools. (Their report cites studies showing that students get 40 percent of their calories at school, and that 80 percent of kids who are overweight at ages 10 to 15 are obese by age 25.)

How much would that cost?
Mission: Readiness is backing a Senate nutrition bill that would allocate $4.5 billion over 10 years to improving school cuisine.

Is this the first time the military has been up in arms about school lunches?
Ironically, no. Military leaders pushed Congress to create the national school lunch program in 1946, "as a measure of national security," because so many soldiers in World War II were rejected due to stunted growth or other problems tied to undernourishment.
More on link

NATO looks for a few good militiamen in Kandahar; hoping to convert to cops
Article Link
By: Murray Brewster, THE CANADIAN PRESS 21/04/2010

NATO commanders in Kandahar are hoping to lure a handful of tribal militias into the Afghan National Police as a way of further cementing law and order in the region, says a senior officer.

But the plan is not without critics, who describe the notorious corrupt police force as a "broken institution."

A defence source said Wednesday one of the more prominent targets of negotiations is expected to be Gen. Razik, who has built his own militia around the Adozai, a prominent branch of the Achakzai tribe in the border region on Spin Boldak. There are other smaller community-type tribal militias in Kandahar, whom the coalition would like to persuade to join the police.

Canadian Brig.-Gen. Craig King, director of future plans for NATO's regional command south, would not name the tribal militias being considered, but said you can't have multiple police-type forces running around the countryside.

"There's a couple around right now and we're in delicate stages, trying to build the force and bring them in," King said in a recent interview with The Canadian Press.

He estimated about 100 militia members might be brought in during the initial stage. But they would have to agree to be screened and trained just like the thousands of other police recruits who are the subject of intense mentoring.

King also made a clear distinction between tribal militias - or village constabularies - and private security forces for local powerbrokers.

"We're not talking the same sort of thing as warlords, private armies (that) operate outside the authority of the government," he said.

They would have to have "a certain degree of authority within the tribal framework."
More on link

Security Brief: The difficulties of training Afghan police
Article Link

Yar Mohammed is a police chief in Kandahar and his "in-tray" is overflowing. Besides commanding fledgling recruits to the force - and trying to convince more to join, he is a prime target, as is anyone in a position of authority - for the Taliban. And he has to deal with the perennial curse of corruption within his own force.

He tells visiting U.S. soldiers that when he sends new recruits to submit their paperwork, they often have to pay a fee - in cash. There should not be any fee, but this is Afghanistan.

Tales of corruption abound - Afghans going through the Western training courses tell their trainers how they never get their full salary because their senior officers take a cut first.

The latest program to improve the professionalism of Afghan police is an eight-week course overseen by international trainers. It's basic - after all, while many express a desire to protect their people, some recruits are illiterate.

"So, in the classroom, we have to teach them by rote, and when they're tested it has to be all verbal," one official said.
More on link
 
Partnering in Afghanistan
New McChrystal Approach Means Greater Danger for German Forces
(usual copyright disclaimer)
Spiegel Online, April 22
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,690526,00.html

    During his much-anticipated visit to Berlin, US General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, refrained from making any demands for additional German troops. But McChrystal's new "partnering" strategy means the Bundeswehr will have to get involved in highly dangerous operations...

    McChrystal wants to explain what he has in mind. He believes that NATO can succeed in Afghanistan, he says. And no matter how hard the journalists press him, he does not mention a single demand. "I am not asking for more troops," McChrystal said. Instead, he said, he is putting the 5,000 additional American troops that are being deployed to northern Afghanistan unconditionally under German command [emphasis added].

    With his comments, the general revealed a refreshingly realistic view of the Afghanistan conflict. His message: We can win the mission, but that's not a given...

    With his mild words, McChrystal was trying to accommodate the German government. Some three hours after the event at the Ritz-Carlton, McChrystal, dressed in an immaculate dark green dress uniform with sparkling medals, was standing next to Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg. Guttenberg didn't need to explain to him how difficult it is to sell the Afghanistan mission politically in Germany, where a majority of Germans oppose the Bundeswehr deployment...

    Exit Strategy

    In their discussions, the two officials paid particular attention to McChrystal's exit strategy. That strategy envisions training as quickly as possible tens of thousands of Afghan soldiers who will then be responsible for the security of their country. It is supposed to happen quickly: US President Barack Obama wants to start withdrawing the first US soldiers as early as 2011. To make that happen, McChrystal has developed a new approach. Speaking in Berlin, McChrystal became enthusiastic when he talked about so-called "partnering," in which international soldiers train Afghans more or less by fighting together at the front.

    From McChrystal's perspective, the new approach represents the key to success. "The international forces have better weapons and more fighting techniques," he said. "The Afghans speak the language, know the customs and have much better access to information." The best approach, therefore, is for units to fight, eat and live together, he said, explaining that that is the way camaraderie is built.

    These are the moments in which the soldier in McChrystal can be heard. It's clear that he would like to be taking part in the training himself...

    For the Germans, the new strategy involves far greater risks than before, as the deaths of the four soldiers last week made clear. Although the operation "Taohid II" that the soldiers were participating in did not make any real use of partnering, it was intended as a kind of blueprint for how the Bundeswehr can give practical training to Afghan soldiers. The aim was to drive the Taliban out of the Baghlani-jadid area with 3,000 Afghan soldiers using concentrated force. The Germans were to support the operation with logistics and technology. In last week's attack, three soldiers were killed by a booby trap and a doctor died when the armored ambulance he was traveling in came under fire.

    Guttenberg assured McChrystal that the Bundeswehr would also train the Afghan National Army (ANA) in combat operations beginning at the start of 2011 [emphasis added]. The defense minister is speaking these days in increasingly realistic terms about the new approach. The partnering strategy conceals "new and greater risks" than current Bundeswehr activities, he said Wednesday. The situation in the north will become "dangerous, in parts even very dangerous," he said, adding that there was no point in "beating around the bush" when discussing the issue...

    German forces will be increasingly dependent on US help in the coming months. The Bundeswehr has long suffered from significant gaps when it comes to the air transport of troops and special forces. The US Army is now moving quickly to fill these gaps. McChrystal will redeploy at least 56 US helicopters to Kunduz and Mazar-e-Sharif in the coming weeks [emphasis added].

    This massive aid will also, however, make it harder for the Germans to resist the new, at times very robust, American strategy -- including the relentless pursuit of the Taliban.

Mark
Ottawa
 
Articles found April 23, 2010

Afghan detainee monitoring not undermined by offer of advance notice, Ottawa insists
Article Link
Posted on23 April 2010.

Canada offered to give Afghan jailers advance notice of detainee monitoring visits but Ottawa insists the proposal of 14 months ago was a blunder by a senior diplomat that never undermined the way this country inspects for torture.

The Harper government regularly boasts of its stringent efforts to safeguard prisoners that Canadian soldiers hand over to Afghanistan’s torture-prone intelligence service. Since 2007, these include surprise visits so that Afghan jailers can’t hide evidence of abuse.

“Our officials can visit prisons unannounced at any time. These are great improvements from the previous arrangement we inherited,” Defence Minister Peter MacKay told the Commons last December.

But on Feb. 11, 2009, Canada signed a letter along with the United Kingdom and the Netherlands that proposed what would be a big change in how monitoring takes place.

It appears to have been an effort to coax the Afghan National Directorate of Security to reopen detention facilities to the three countries after the notorious intelligence agency stopped allowing check-up visits to at least some locations.
More on link

Nato sets out plans to transfer control in Afghanistan
Article Link

Nato is preparing to hand control of parts of Afghanistan to the Afghan people this year, Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasumussen has said.

Nato foreign ministers, and their partners in the international coalition in Afghanistan, have been meeting in the Estonian capital Tallinn.

They endorsed a plan to gradually transfer security and governance powers to Afghan authorities.

The US and Nato have 126,000 troops there, rising to 150,000 by August.

US President Barack Obama has said that the US aims to begin pulling troops out of Afghanistan in 2011.

But at the heart of Nato's strategy is creating the right conditions to allow the Afghan government to take full control.

July summit

"As of today, we have a road map which will lead towards transition to Afghan lead [control], starting this year," Mr Rasmussen said.
More on link
 
Bombs, bullets and boredom: Charlie Company saw it all
CP, April 23
http://thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9016148.html

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — Many of them came charging into Kandahar last fall with visions in their minds of gun battles and light armoured vehicles laying down cannon fire across the desert.

But for members of Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, theirs turned out to be a very different war.

The battle group's commanding officer, Lt.-Col. Jerry Walsh, seemed fond of quoting some his soldiers who described their tour as ``living like rats'' in the tiny, spartan patrol bases that dot the Panjwaii district outside Kandahar city.

Even for the veterans of Charlie Company, the last six months have seemed a little bit unreal.

The unit, among the most storied in today's Canadian army, has seen two tours of this region. It was among the first companies to be bloodied by the Taliban as violence spiralled out of control in the spring of 2006.

There are many fresh faces in the ranks, some of them young kids who joined up in 2007 watching the images of Charlie Company's battles on the television news.

But that was then. That was back in a time when Canada was defending virtually the entire province and soldiers were running between battles.

``We were firefighters back then,'' the veterans like to say.

The influx of thousands of U.S. troops, as marked the other day by the handover of Canada's so-called model village project in Deh-e-Bagh, in nearby Dand district, has radically changed the face of this conflict.

So has the strategy of western soldiers living in communities with their Afghan counterparts at combat outposts, instead of fortified bases.

The Patricias were there first battle group to do so.

There are still enormous risks, but instead of wild firefights, there is a steady stream of homemade bombs and roadside explosions. Eleven soldiers died and an untold number of wounded went home during PPCLI's latest tour.

But when they patrol, it is in support of the Afghan army and on Afghan time, which is decidedly more relaxed than what Canadian troops are familiar with.

And for many of these guys, Kandahar has slipped into the old adage: War is 95 per cent boredom and five per cent sheer terror...

Troops from the Ontario-based 1st Battalion of the Royal Canadian Regiment, another battle-hardened unit that fought the landmark Operation Medusa in 2006, have started to slip in to the lines to replace the Patricias [emphasis added]...

Mark
Ottawa
 
"More Reason for Optimism"
Conference of Defence Associations' media round-up (lots more than Afstan--Congo, Iran), April 23
http://www.cdaforumcad.ca/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1272051554/0#0

Mark
Ottawa
 
Articles found April 24, 2010

Allies to turn blind eye to corruption as Afghan exit strategy agreed
Article Link
Troops will remain in place 'for decades' after handover to support local forces
By Kim Sengupta, in Tallinn

Nato has agreed on its long-awaited road map for the future of Afghanistan
amid warnings that the process risks tolerating corruption and the power of the warlords for the sake of security
.

The Alliance's summit in the Estonian capital ended last night without the details of the framework for a handover of security to President Hamid Karzai's forces being made public. The Independent has learned, however, that an area will be deemed ready for transfer if serious violence has been in abeyance for a period of time, if there is access to power by different ethnic and tribal elements and if the conditions are present for development projects taking place in relative safety.

According to senior diplomatic sources, clusters of provinces, rather than individual ones, will be transferred to "provide critical mass" able to withstand the Taliban. The decisions on the locations for handover and the timeframe involved will be made at a Nato conference later this year after talks between Western and Afghan government officials.
Related articles

    * Attacks against contractors surging in Afghanistan
    * Search the news archive for more stories

The start of the handover will not, however, mean that troops can start to withdraw, Nato officials stressed. British troops in particular will have to wait before pulling out as the areas in the south where they are based – the main battleground with the Taliban --– will be among the last to be transferred to Afghan control. Gordon Brown had stated that the handover process will start this year, allowing UK forces to begin returning home.

The Nato secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, warned: "The future of this mission is clear and visible: more Afghan capability and more Afghan leadership... But it will not be a pullout. It will not be a run for the exit... Our soldiers will move into a more supportive role. So it will be a gradual process. This is conditions-based and not calendar-driven.''

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
said: "We believe that with sufficient training and mentoring, the Afghans themselves are perfectly capable of defending themselves against insurgents. Does this mean it will be smooth sailing? I don't think so, just look at Iraq. A lot of progress has been made there but there are still problems with terrorism."

Mrs Clinton said she appreciated that there was a shortfall of staff to train the Afghan security forces. However, she added: "We have a gap that we're still working to fill. I'm convinced we'll get that filled. For me, the glass is way more than half full."
More on link

Detainee-monitoring changes never implemented: Cannon
  Article Link
By JULIET O'NEILL, Canwest News ServiceApril 24, 2010

A Canadian diplomat's offer to Afghan authorities to both conduct joint-detainee monitoring with British and Dutch officials and to give advance notice of detention centre visits was never implemented, Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said yesterday.

Cannon told the House of Commons the offers - which had been expressed in a joint letter with diplomats from Britain and the Netherlands - had "neither standing nor effect" and that Canada has never swerved from a May 3, 2007 policy of unannounced visits to Afghan detention facilities to check detainees transferred by Canadian armed forces.

The February 2009 letter to Amrullah Saleh, head of the Afghan National Directorate of Security (NDS), has been cited in a British court case on alleged torture of British-transferred detainees as an attempt "to pander to the NDS" at a time when it appeared to be limiting access, stalling investigations of prisoner abuse and moving prisoners without notice.

The letter also said the British, Dutch and Canadians "assure you of our commitment to help build a new NDS detention facility in Kabul."

The signing of the letter by Ben Rowswell, Canada's then-embassy chargé d'affaires, was described as "a misstep from the embassy" in testimony by Ron Hoffman, the Canadian ambassador to Afghanistan in 2008-2009, at a Commons committee hearing earlier this week.

"The provisions of the letter had neither standing nor effect," Cannon said. "The chargé d'affaires did sign the letter, but the contents of the letter were never implemented.

"Immediately after reviewing the letter, ambassador Hoffmann reiterated Canada's long-standing new transfer policy to the NDS, that officials would conduct unannounced visits with considerable frequency, and the NDS did know that."
More on link

Violence, greed and poverty stall aid
A tale of two villages. Canadian reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan receive mixed reception
By ETHAN BARON, Canwest News ServiceApril 24, 2010
Article Link

Violence, greed and poverty: the trio of ills hampering development efforts in Afghanistan confronted a Canadian Forces patrol this week in two villages that sit beside each other but remain worlds apart.

For these soldiers from the military's construction, civilian-co-operation and combat groups, the journey through West Teymurian and Angurian, 10 kilometres southwest of Kandahar City, is an exercise in frustration, a struggle for compassion and further evidence that success here is measured in tiny steps.

They leave just after sunrise - led by two Afghan policemen to put a government face on the mission - marching from a tiny fortified outpost by the Tarnak River, past green fields of ripening wheat sprinkled with pot plants. At the outskirts of West Teymurian, a large white dog approaches, barking ferociously but showing enough sense to keep its distance from soldiers and officers bristling with guns, rockets and grenades.

Inside the village, a toddler sits on a dirt road, her feet in a Canadian-built concrete gutter clotted with sewage, mud and trash. She looks at the soldiers and starts to cry. An older boy scoops her up and runs into a compound. Other children greet the soldiers in Pashto and follow behind.

At a large pit in a dirt clearing, Chief Warrant Officer Fred Denninger talks to the Afghan manager of a Canadian-funded playground project. The military's Construction Management Organization (CMO) is paying local men and boys to fill the pit so the Civil-Military Co-operation section can build the playground. The villagers are paid $10 to work half the day, so "they can work in their fields for their other half, grow their marijuana or whatever," Denninger says.

Corrupt contractors exploit Canada's focus on village development, Denninger says. "They are overbidding because they know that's what our main interest is. If we want to get stuff done, we have to work with them. The contractors are definitely getting rich."
More on link

Canadian battle group saw bullets, boredom in Kandahar
Article Link

The Canadian Press

Date: Friday Apr. 23, 2010 2:43 PM ET

KANDAHAR — Many of them came charging into Kandahar last fall with visions in their minds of gun battles and light armoured vehicles laying down cannon fire across the desert.

But for members of Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, theirs turned out to be a very different war.

The battle group's commanding officer, Lt.-Col. Jerry Walsh, seemed fond of quoting some of his soldiers, whom he said described their tour as "living like rats" in the tiny, spartan patrol bases that dot the Panjwaii district outside Kandahar city.

Even for the veterans of Charlie Company, the last six months have seemed a little bit unreal.

The unit, among the most storied in today's Canadian army, has seen two tours of this region. It was among the first companies to be bloodied by the Taliban as violence spiralled out of control in the spring of 2006.

There are many fresh faces in the ranks, some of them young kids who joined up in 2007 watching the images of Charlie Company's battles on the television news.

But that was then. That was back in a time when Canada was defending virtually the entire province and soldiers were running between battles.

"We were firefighters back then," the veterans like to say.

The influx of thousands of U.S. troops was marked the other day by the handover of Canada's so-called model village project in Deh-e-Bagh, in nearby Dand district, to an American unit.

The reinforcements have radically changed the face of this conflict.
More on link

Afghanistan: US wants British troops to leave Helmand
Senior British military figures have held talks with top US commanders about moving UK troops from the country's Helmand province to the Kandahar region.
Article Link
By Toby Harnden, Thomas Harding and Damien McElroy Published: 10:00PM BST 23 Apr 2010

Discussions over have taken place between Gen David Petraeus and Army officers following months of pressure from the American military.

The move would be highly-controversial as more than 252 of the 281 British troops to die in Afghanistan have been killed in Helmand.

A switch to Kandahar would risk undermining public support but a refusal to do so would risk alienating the Americans.

The issue is likely to be one of the first and most difficult decisions to be taken by the next Prime Minister following the May 6 election.

US commanders believe command arrangements would be greatly simplified if US Marines controlled the whole of Helmand and are keen to get on with the job.

Senior British figures have resisted the idea for some time but generals and senior diplomats are increasingly warming to the idea that they should "declare victory" in Helmand and move west to the city of Kandahar.

Foreign Office sources in London said that the relocation was now becoming an "assumption" in some quarters rather than a mere option.

Lt Gen Sir Nick Parker, deputy commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, and Maj Gen Nick Carter, commander of Nato forces in southern Afghanistan, are understood to have advocated the switch on the grounds of coherence of command and in the interests of maintaining relations with the Marine Expeditionary Force.

Gen Petraeus, senior American commander in the Middle East and Central Asia, and Gen Stanley McChrystal, commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, are strongly in favour.
More on link
 
Articles found April 25, 2010

Forged in the fire of Afghanistan
Article Link
Allan Woods Ottawa Bureau

The maiden mission of the Afghan war for Canada’s elite JTF2 commandos almost killed them.

Over Pakistan, returning from a daring raid on an enemy compound, six of the members of the secretive team narrowly avoided a crash when their helicopter nearly ran out of fuel as it spirited them to safety.

They escaped with their lives – and with their hands on their prize.

Also on that flight in late 2001 were six United States Green Berets and a computer hard drive that would help greatly in the hunt for Taliban and al-Qaeda leaders.

That hard drive was the ultimate quarry of the Canadian mission, part of Task Force K-Bar, the name given the unit of special forces soldiers which arrived in Afghanistan from seven countries. It included Canada’s JTF2.

The inside story of that mission can now be told for the first time following a Toronto Star investigation into the top-secret operations that would cement Canada's reputation as one of the top special forces teams in the world.

The international task force has been credited with killing more than 100 top level Taliban and al Qaeda leaders and the JTF2 stalks the enemy in Afghanistan to this day. But the distance of time has now shed light on that initial six-month deployment of Canada’s most secretive soldiers.
More on link

Injured captain returns to duty: 'If I can do it, why wouldn't I?'
  Article Link
Officer inspires others to overcome staggering odds and keep working
Edmonton JournalApril 25, 2010 3:04 AM

Capt. Simon Mailloux had to be told six times that he'd lost half his left leg.

The first five times, he completely forgot.

Every time he fell asleep, he'd forget what he'd learned while awake. Again and again, he woke in an unfamiliar bed, surrounded by doctors he didn't recognize and was told a roadside bomb in Afghanistan had left him an amputee.

"That was the worst time of all of it," the Quebec-based soldier remembers, "being helpless in that bed."

Days earlier, on Sept. 16, 2007, Mailloux was a platoon commander in a mission to open a police sub-station in southern Afghanistan. Basically, to try some law and order in a region that had little.

On a Zhari district road, his light armoured vehicle was struck by a massive IED blast that killed two Canadian soldiers, including a medic, and an Afghan interpreter.

"There was a big shock wave of heat in my face," the 26-year-old remembers. "It was like an oven that was punching me in the face. My leg couldn't move, my jaw was fractured on the right side and I had other facial injuries. I was out of it, I was trying to look around. I tried to reach my weapon to defend myself, because that's the training. Really, though, I was helpless."

Mailloux was rescued by his uninjured driver. As he was carried on a stretcher onto a helicopter for the ride to the Kandahar Airfield hospital, Mailloux grabbed the arm of his major.

"I remember telling him, 'Just wait for me. I'll be back in a couple weeks, I'll be back.' I didn't know how bad my injury was and it actually meant I was really out of there. I wanted to come back at that point, and it's been inside me since then."

Even wounded, he felt guilty for leaving as the chopper lifted into the air.

The next time he woke, he was in Germany with a spotty memory and a leg amputated through the knee.
More on link

RCMP ready for beefed-up Afghan role: chief
Last Updated: Saturday, April 24, 2010
Article Link

Canadian combat troops are slated to leave Afghanistan next summer, but RCMP Commissioner William Elliott said Saturday he expects his personnel will have to stay behind to undertake the "huge challenge" of training police officers.

About 50 RCMP and other civilian Canadian police are posted to Afghanistan as part of a mission to train the Afghan National Police. The ANP, as it's known, has had a reputation for roadside shakedowns and graft that Canadian officials hope mentoring, training and supervision will eradicate.

Elliott, who visited Kandahar this weekend to review the Mounties' operations there, said he's seen "indications from the government" that it wants the training to plow on once combat soldiers ship out starting in July 2011.

"I expect that that will continue," he said of the police mission.

"I don't know what the future will bring," the commissioner added. "We're at the beginning of looking at options, but there are a lot more questions than answers at the moment."

One question is whether the Tories will seek to send more police to Afghanistan to fill the void left by the withdrawal of the Canadian Forces. The federal government has been pressured by the United States to maintain a large presence in the central Asian country past 2011.

Elliott assured that if Ottawa wants to beef up its constabulary presence as it draws down the military one, "we'll be able carry out whatever task the government of Canada gives us here."
Recruits substandard, RCMP chief says

Those tasks aren't easy. As foreign mentors try to cleanse the Afghan National Police of its venal tendencies — officers have been known to routinely hit up the subjects of their investigations for a payoff and are widely distrusted by the populace — they've had to adapt their teaching methods for the different calibre of the force's cadets.
More on link

  Political failure in Afghanistan
Posted By GRANT LAFLECHE
Article Link

I cannot help but wonder if all the effort, the spilled blood and lost soldiers in Afghanistan have been worth it.

Our troops have put a consistent beating on Taliban forces. You really have to look at Mike Tyson vs. Michael Spinks in 1988 to find another beating this complete -- that was when pre-crazy-tattooed Tyson put poor Spinks through the ropes in 91 seconds of the first round. The Taliban is the Michael Spinks of military combat.

But how much has Afghanistan changed? We've lost more than 140 soldiers since the mission began. Yet the country is still run by Hamid Karzai, a corrupt ex-Taliban who, after finally getting some political pressure from the West to clean up his act, is threatening to join his old buddies.

Yes, there have been some elections, but they were marred by fraud. Schools have been built, but girls still face the real risk of having battery acid thrown in their faces for having the gall to want an education. Women are still murdered if they dare decline the privilege of being covered from head to toe in heavy cloth. Karazi's government has a ministry to enforce Sharia law. The tradition of bacha bazi, a pedophilia black market where little boys are bought and sold as sex slaves for men, continues unabated and even involves Afghan military and police! (Check out the recent PBS Frontline expose on the issue called The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan.)

This is what Canadian troops are dying to protect? It's hard to look at the Afghanistan mission in 2010 without adding the word "failure."

To be clear, this is not a military failure. For the most part Taliban troops are a disorganized gaggle of lunatics who need a stiff belt of homegrown opium to work up the courage to face a modern military like ours. So the best these idiots can do is harass allied forces with roadside bombs. The explosions can be tragic, but they won't ever win a war.
More on link
 
Afghan spy chief: 'I told MI5 that prisoners were being tortured'
Article Link
UK forces are accused of handing over Taliban detainees to Kandahar interrogators despite claims of ill-treatment

Fresh claims have emerged that MI5 was aware of allegations that Afghan detainees were being mistreated by the country's security service during the period UK forces were handing prisoners over to the Afghan authorities.

Last week the high court heard details of torture allegedly suffered by prisoners handed over to the Afghan domestic security service. A memo, seen by the Observer, reveals that the head of Afghanistan's intelligence agency indicated to UK officials in March 2007 that he was aware of ill-treatment claims involving prisoners.

In the document, marked confidential, Amrullah Saleh, chief of the National Directorate of Security (NDS), admits he is "aware of allegations of mistreatment" relating to detainees in Kandahar province.

Human rights lawyers allege that no action appears to have been taken by UK forces as a result and that British troops handed over detainees to the NDS Kandahar facility in 2007.

The memo coincides with a judicial review in the high court, being brought by anti-war activist Maya Evans against Britain's policy of transferring suspected insurgents.

The court heard how six Afghan detainees – Taliban suspects – handed over by British troops to NDS prisons were allegedly deprived of sleep, whipped with rubber cables and subjected to electric shocks. Backed by law firm Public Interest Lawyers, Evans argues Britain has breached the Human Rights Act by handing over prisoners to a country known to participate in torture. The lawyers claim the NDS had a notorious reputation for mistreating prisoners and British officers should have known of the risks.

Saleh's admission is contained in a memo written a month before allegations surfaced in the Canadian press that the country's soldiers deliberately transferred prisoners to be tortured. The allegations provoked uproar in Canada with pressure still building on the government to launch a public inquiry into the claims.
More on link

B.C. centre will help veterans return to normal life
Article Link

The Canadian Press

Date: Saturday Apr. 24, 2010 6:32 PM PT

NEW WESTMINSTER, B.C. — When Tony Spiess came back from Canada's peacekeeping mission in Croatia in 1993, he came back with a lot of baggage.

He'd borne witness to genocide and hatred, and ultimately ended up in a fire fight with heavily armed Croatian troops in the battle of Medak Pocket. He was suffering from post-traumatic stress and didn't find much in the way of help.

"Coming home from Croatia, there was absolutely nothing. I was fighting, and then a week later I was walking the streets of Vancouver," said Spiess, who was a member of the Seaforth Highlanders.

"We're talking experiencing and witnessing and fighting genocide, ethnic cleansing and all this stuff, and a week later, here I am walking the streets. And not just me -- I'm talking about a battalion of men."

Then, when he left the forces in 1997, there were not a lot of job postings for machine gunners. He didn't know what to do next.

Spiess came across the Veterans Transition Program, funded by the Royal Canadian Legion with help from the University of British Columbia. Through the intensive program aimed at reintegrating soldiers into civilian life, he began to deal with his psychological scars and set off on a new life outside the military.

Now 40 and a professional firefighter, Spiess was there on Saturday when ground was broken for Honour House, a unique transition house that will offer respite and help for soldiers and first-responders such as police, firefighters and paramedics.

"It was just fantastic to actually walk through the house and see it and know a lot of soldiers and first-responders are going to be using this and a lot of families are going to benefit," he said afterwards.

The 10-bedroom, 10-bath home in New Westminster will undergo a major renovation in the next few months to become a first-of-its-kind retreat.

Honour House has been described as a Ronald McDonald House for soldiers and first-responders. They and their families will be able to stay free in the home while they or a member of their families are seeking medical or psychological treatment.

And the Veterans Transition Program, the intensive 14-day program that helped Spiess get back on his feet, will be run out of Honour House.
More on link

More questions than answers in post-2011 Afghan cop training: RCMP boss
Article Link
Murray Brewster, THE CANADIAN PRESS

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - The RCMP has started looking at how to continue the police training mission in Afghanistan after the Canadian military pulls out next year, the Mounties' top man said Saturday.

But Commissioner William Elliot noted there are a number of details and variables to be worked out, among them, who would protect and transport the police trainers as they go about their business in the volatile country.

"We're at the beginning of looking at options, but there are a lot more questions than answers at the moment," Elliot told reporters after wrapping up a brief visit to Kandahar.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay dropped a broad hint a few weeks ago that Canada's continued involvement here would likely revolve around police training, but he gave few specifics.

Elliot said the RCMP is prepared to carry on, but will need the participation of municipal forces across the country, in much the same way it has for other international missions.

"Working with all of the police community in Canada, we'll be able to carry out whatever task the government of Canada gives us in Afghanistan," he said.

There are 48 Canadian police trainers at the joint Canadian and American provincial reconstruction base in Kandahar. But they rely heavily on the Canadian army for protection and movement throughout the city, and the rural areas.

There is the possibility that members from the U.S. army's 97th Military Police Battalion which is already located at the reconstruction base, could step in to the role vacated by the army, said Elliot.

"I think there are a lot of specifics to be worked out," he added.

The RCMP commissioner's comments are only the latest question mark to be raised about what happens in Kandahar, starting next year.

Recently the civilian in charge of Canadian reconstruction, Ben Rowswell, said that diplomats and development staff have not been given any marching orders on what happens after the army goes.

"We're awaiting direction from our ministers in Ottawa," Rowswell told reporters April 11.

"We know that we're committed to delivering development projects beyond 2011, but there are many ways you can deliver development projects, depending on how you do it. You either have civilians on the ground - or you don't."

Ottawa has been under mounting international pressure to stay beyond the 2011 deadline, but the Conservative government has been steadfast in its determination to end the military mission. Federal cabinet ministers have mused about continued diplomacy and development, but have been largely silent on how that will happen without soldiers.
More on link
 
Friends and foes in an Afghan shooting gallery
Toronto Star, April 24
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/800301--friends-and-foes-in-an-afghan-shooting-gallery

It was easy to see the enemy everywhere in the wild west, early days of the Afghanistan invasion.

The country, some military officials later recalled, was a commando “shooting gallery” and the top secret missions amounted to little more than man-hunting.

But the soldiers of JTF2 are trained just as much in the art of restraining their lethal force as in dishing it out to an unsuspecting enemy. That training was put to good use one day for the members of Canada’s premier counterterrorist unit.

The details of JTF2’s participation in the initial invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and 2002 were shared with the Toronto Star by key actors involved in the mission, giving a rare behind-the-scenes look at Canada’s top secret special operations force.

They were dispatched high into the rugged mountains of Afghanistan early in 2002 on a reconnaisance mission as part of Task Force K-Bar, a team made up of coalition special operations forces from around the world...

The soldiers of JTF2 were expertly camouflaged to avoid detection, but the surveillance squad was nevertheless discovered by a small group of Afghan men who stumbled over the commandos while on a mountain excursion. Apparently they were hunting birds.

In special forces parlance, they had been compromised. But now the snap decision-making of the elite soldiers came into play. If the hunters were actually enemy fighters, then it was a “hard compromise” and they would sanitized, eliminated, killed.

A “soft compromise” would result in the innocents being captured nonetheless, though their lives would be spared.

The Canadians lay in wait and prepared for the worst, stealthily slipping silencers onto their weapons if the need arose.

It did not. Capturing the unsuspecting hunters was effortless. Carrying out the rest of their mission, for which they had a “no fail” mandate, was the challenge.

They forced the birders to their knees at gunpoint and bound their hands behind their backs, striking mortal fear into the captives who apparently expected the same type of summary execution for which Afghanistan’s Soviet invaders two decades earlier had become notorious...

As the helicopter arrived at the landing zone that day, the JTF2 commandos quickly and quietly clipped the cuffs off their Afghan helpers, allowing them to slip away as they boarded the aircraft and lifted off into the sky.

A tale of two villages: Stark differences between neighbouring Afghan towns.
Canwest News, April 24
http://www.canada.com/tale+villages+Stark+differences+between+neighbouring+Afghan+towns/2943785/story.html

WEST TEYMURIAN, Afghanistan - Violence, greed and poverty: the trio of ills hampering development efforts in Afghanistan confronted a Canadian Forces patrol this week in two villages that sit beside each other but remain worlds apart.

For these soldiers from the military's construction, civilian-co-operation and combat groups, the journey through West Teymurian and Angurian, 10 kilometres southwest of Kandahar City, is an exercise in frustration, a struggle for compassion and further evidence that success here is measured in tiny steps.

They leave just after sunrise - led by two Afghan policemen to put a government face on the mission - marching from a tiny fortified outpost by the Tarnak River, past green fields of ripening wheat sprinkled with pot plants. At the outskirts of West Teymurian, a large white dog approaches, barking ferociously but showing enough sense to keep its distance from soldiers and officers bristling with guns, rockets and grenades.

Inside the village, a toddler sits on a dirt road, her feet in a Canadian- built concrete gutter clotted with sewage, mud and trash. She looks at the soldiers and starts to cry. An older boy scoops her up and runs into a compound. Other children greet the soldiers in Pashto and follow behind.

At a large pit in a dirt clearing, Chief Warrant Officer Fred Denninger talks to the Afghan manager of a Canadian-funded playground project. The military's Construction Management Organization (CMO) is paying local men and boys to fill the pit so the Civil-Military Co-operation (CIMIC) section can build the playground. The villagers are paid $10 to work half the day, so ``they can work in their fields for their other half, grow their marijuana or whatever,'' Denninger says...

Across the road in Angurian, the gutters are clear of sludge, the paths largely free of garbage. Even the children are cleaner. Through the middle of the village runs a 550-metre stone canal wall, built by the CMO. Master Cpl. Alex Cabana, a CMO operator, chalks up the difference in Angurian to the organizational skills and government connections of its village leader, Faizal Muhammad...

Mark
Ottawa
 
ARTICLES FOUND APRIL 26

Elite U.S. Units Step Up Effort in Afghan City Before Attack
NY Times, April 25
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/world/asia/26kandahar.html?ref=world

Small bands of elite American Special Operations forces have been operating with increased intensity for several weeks in Kandahar, southern Afghanistan’s largest city, picking up or picking off insurgent leaders to weaken the Taliban in advance of major operations, senior administration and military officials say...

Instead of the quick punch that opened the Marja offensive, the operation in Kandahar, a sprawling urban area, is designed to be a slowly rising tide of military action. That is why the opening salvos of the offensive are being carried out in the shadows by Special Operations forces.

“Large numbers of insurgent leadership based in and around Kandahar have been captured or killed,” said one senior American military officer directly involved in planning the Kandahar offensive. But, he acknowledged, “it’s still a contested battle space.”

Senior American and allied commanders say the goal is to have very little visible American presence inside Kandahar city itself, with that effort carried by Afghan Army and police units [emphasis added]...

...while allied officials say they will be relying heavily on Afghan forces to take the lead in securing the city, that same tactic has so far produced mixed success in Marja, where Marine Corps officers said they ended up doing much of the hard fighting...

To shape the arrangement of allied forces ahead of the fight, conventional troops have begun operations outside of Kandahar, in a series of provincial districts that ring the city. American and allied officers predict heavy pockets of fighting in those belts. Kandahar, according to a senior military officer, is “infested” with insurgents, but not overrun as was Marja...

Mark
Ottawa
 
Articles found April 27, 2010

U.N. shuts mission in Afghanistan's Kandahar
Article Link
By Ismail Sameem Reuters Tuesday, April 27, 2010; 4:36 AM

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (Reuters) - The United Nations said on Tuesday it had temporarily withdrawn foreign staff and shut its mission in Kandahar, the Afghan city where security has deteriorated ahead of a major military offensive.

U.N. spokeswoman Susan Manuel said some foreign staff in the Kandahar office had been moved to the capital Kabul for their safety, and Afghan staff there had been told to stay home.

She would not say how many international staff had been withdrawn and how many had stayed behind or whether a specific threat was behind the decision.

"The security situation has gotten to the point where we needed to withdraw them yesterday," she said. "We hope people can go back and keep doing what they have been doing. We see it as a very temporary measure."

NATO forces are planning the biggest military offensive of the nearly nine-year-old war in coming months in and around Kandahar, the biggest city in the south and heartland of the Taliban movement.
More on link

Liberals press government on Kandahar push
Last Updated: Monday, April 26, 2010 CBC News
Article Link

A looming U.S.-led offensive in the southern Afghanistan city of Kandahar led Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff to press the Conservative government Monday on what role Canadian troops might play.

The U.S. has signalled the Kandahar push will come this summer. Kandahar has about half a million residents and is the birthplace of the Taliban, who still have support there.

Reports says the aim of the U.S. military move is to push Taliban fighters out of the area and overwhelm warlords who allow insurgents to slip back into the city.
More on link

Cellphone video of alleged Afghan victim shown to murder court martial
Article Link
By: THE CANADIAN PRESS 26/04/2010

A cellphone video of the victim of an alleged battlefield execution in Afghanistan was shown at an unprecedented court martial of a Canadian soldier.

The 10-minute video, shot by a soldier in the Afghan National Army, shows a bearded, motionless man covered up to his chest in a light blue blanket.

When an Afghan soldier partially pulls back the blanket, one of the victim's legs is seen to be all but severed above the ankle, although no other wounds are visible.

Capt. Robert Semrau, 36, is charged with second-degree murder for allegedly firing two shots into the man from close range shortly after the video was taken in October 2008.

The grainy images show no signs of life from the alleged victim, nor do they show any efforts at medical care, nor Afghan soldiers kicking sand on him as has been testified in court.

The video also calls into dispute testimony that a fierce firefight was underway at the time, as Afghan and Canadian soldiers are seen standing upright in an open field seemingly at ease for several minutes.

Cpl. Steven Fournier, one of the key prosecution witnesses, is set to testify about the events surrounding the video and what he saw take place after the camera was shut off.

Fournier was Semrau's junior partner in their four-man Operation Mentor Liaison Team, which was helping guide the Afghan National Army troops during an operation in Helmand province.

Earlier Monday at the court martial, Fournier had testified about the field medicine course he had taken in preparation for working on the liaison team, and the way it applied to the Canadian Forces' code of conduct. The injured were to be treated starting with the most badly wounded first, regardless of whether friend or foe.

"It was very clear cut," Fournier told the court martial. "It didn't matter who it was, you treat him the same as everybody else."

Fournier also described a relationship with Semrau, his superior officer, that went beyond the purely professional.
More on link

British military split over plan to move troops to Kandahar
Article Link
Sceptics oppose Washington strategy to replace Canadian and Dutch forces
By Kim Sengupta in Tallinn Tuesday, 27 April 2010

Controversial plans under which British troops would move from Helmand province, their main centre of operation, to the Taliban heartland of Kandahar and neighbouring Uruzgan have caused divisions within the UK's military  and diplomatic hierarchy.

The planned redeployment is a key plank of the strategy of General Stanley McChrystal, the American commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, to achieve a military victory before talks get under way with elements of the Taliban.

The Independent has learned that although the two most senior British commanders in Afghanistan are backing the proposed transfer, the head of the military, Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, believes it will be a mistake. So keen are the Americans for the British force to make the switch that Washington has offered to underwrite a sizeable part of the substantial costs involved.

General Sir David Richards, the highly influential head of the Army, is said to be "keeping an open mind" on the matter. He is keen to ensure that the Kandahar mission is not summarily ruled out and would like a feasibility study to be undertaken so that various options can be presented to whoever is in 10 Downing Street after the 6 May election

The proposal was discussed privately among officials who attended a Nato foreign ministers meeting in the Estonian capital, Tallinn, at the end of last week. However, the political sensitivities involved, namely the impending UK election, has meant that no official comment has been made.

In another prong of Gen McChrystal's strategy, defence sources have revealed that the general is considering sending US forces to the Kunduz region in the north to counter a growing insurgency, despite the presence of 4,300 German troops.
More on link

Afghan court jails Briton on bribery charges
Article Link

A British manager of a firm providing security to the UK embassy in Kabul has been jailed for two years after being found guilty of bribery charges.

Ex-army officer Bill Shaw was tried by the Afghan anti-corruption court, partly funded by the UK government.

He was also fined $25,000 (£16,185). Reports say his lawyers will appeal against his conviction.

Shaw admitted paying for the release of two armoured cars - impounded by the Afghan authorities last October.

But his defence lawyer insisted Shaw thought he was making an official release payment rather than handing over a bribe.

The BBC's Martin Patience in Kabul says his trial was one of the first cases heard by an anti-corruption court which was set up to help the Afghan government crack down on corruption.

But there are suggestions that Shaw's conviction is an attempt by the Afghan government to prove its claim that foreigners are responsible for most of the country's corruption, our correspondent adds.
More on link

Blackwater trained Canadian troops
Article Link
Defence spent more than $6-million at controversial U.S. security firm
Tom Blackwell, National Post  Published: Tuesday, April 27, 2010

The National Defence Department has spent more than $6-million having its troops trained by the controversial Blackwater security company, whose own employees have been accused of needlessly killing civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, documents show.

The department sent a succession of personnel to Blackwater's Moyock, N.C., training compound from 2005 to as recently as April2009, some of them learning tactics for working in dangerous settings, records obtained through access-to-information legislation indicate.

The work continued even after the U.S. State Department cancelled its pricey security contract with the company in Iraq amid mounting criticism of Blackwater's actions.

The training courses included defensive driving and "close protection" in hostile environments, as well as specialized weapons use, a DND spokesman said.

The U.S. firm was judged to be the best bidder in tenders put out for the work, and controversy associated with other aspects of its business would not have come into play,

Major Vance White said.
More on link
 
A bit from from Ignatieff & Co. from the House of Commons yesterday:

Mr. Michael Ignatieff (Leader of the Opposition, Lib.):  Mr. Speaker, according to U.S. military officials, major new combat operations are planned for Kandahar in the coming weeks. The New York Times even talked about the decisive battle for Kandahar, yet our government will not tell us anything.  I have two questions. Are the Canadian Forces taking part in these operations? Why is the government keeping Canadians in the dark?

Mr. Laurie Hawn (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence, CPC):  Mr. Speaker, the fact is we work with all of our allies. The Americans are our principal ally in Afghanistan. Operations are planned with them. We participate at a level that is commensurate with our obligations in Afghanistan and to the Afghan people.  I cannot comment on that particular operation. It would be premature at this time. 

Mr. Michael Ignatieff (Leader of the Opposition, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, if we take part with the Americans and they are willing to talk about it openly to their people, why can the government not do the same with ours?  The issue here is that U.S. officials say that a decisive combat operation will be initiated in Kandahar in the coming weeks. The Conservative government has said nothing to the Canadian people about this important matter.  Again I ask the question, what will be Canada's involvement in these operations? Why can the government not tell Canadians the truth about it?

Mr. Laurie Hawn (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence, CPC): Mr. Speaker, as the Government of Canada we ensure that we protect our soldiers, we protect the security of our operations, and we protect the important relationships we have with our allies, whether it be the Americans or the Afghan people. If there is information that needs to be shared that does not violate the safety and security of our troops, it will be shared.

Mr. Michael Ignatieff (Leader of the Opposition, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the government refuses to answer the most basic questions about these issues even when Canadian lives are at stake.  Today we learned that there are new reports of a government-wide ban on transparency, ordered by the Prime Minister's Office. Officials talk about it, and call it unprecedented, draconian and Orwellian. The Prime Minister's obsession with secrecy means that Canadians have to read in American newspapers about what Canadian troops are doing in Afghanistan.  Why this Conservative culture of deceit ®?

Hon. John Baird (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, CPC):  Mr. Speaker, I do not know where the Leader of the Opposition has been for the last four years, but let me say that Canadian troops, our men and women in uniform, have been playing a decisive role in Afghanistan for many years.  We welcome the increased presence of American soldiers. We welcome the increased presence of the French and others. Step by step we are making substantial commitments in Afghanistan.  We are working hard and we are getting the job done, thanks to our men and women in uniform ....
 
U.S. training Afghan villagers to fight the Taliban
Washington Post, April 27
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/26/AR2010042604215.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzhead

ARGHANDAB DISTRICT, AFGHANISTAN -- Taliban fighters used to swagger with impunity through this farming village, threatening to assassinate government collaborators. They seeded the main thoroughfare, a dirt road with moonlike craters, with land mines. They paid local men to attack U.S. and Afghan troops.

Then, beginning in late February, a small detachment of U.S. Special Forces soldiers organized nearly two dozen villagers into an armed Afghan-style neighborhood watch group.

These days, the bazaar is thriving. The schoolhouse has reopened. People in the area have become confident enough to report Taliban activity to the village defense force and the police. As a consequence, insurgent attacks have nearly ceased and U.S. soldiers have not hit a single roadside bomb in the area in two months, according to the detachment.

"Everyone feels safer now," said Nasarullah, one of two gray-bearded tribal elders in charge of the village force. "Nobody worries about getting killed anymore."

The rapid and profound changes have generated excitement among top U.S. military officials in Afghanistan, fueling hope that such groups could reverse insurgent gains by providing the population a degree of protection that the police, the Afghan army and even international military forces have been unable to deliver.

But plans to expand the program have been stymied by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who fears the teams could turn into offensive militias, the kind that wreaked havoc on the country in the 1990s and prompted the rise of the Taliban. "This is playing with fire," an Afghan government official said. "These groups may bring us security today, but what happens tomorrow?"

Citing Karzai's objections, Karl W. Eikenberry, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, has blocked the release of money needed to broaden the initiative. He also has instructed State Department personnel in the country not to assist the effort until the Afghan government endorses it...

Cricket's most heart-warming story
BBC blog, Oliver Brett, April 27
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/oliverbrett/2010/04/crickets_most_heartwarming_sto.html#more

At one level, the ICC World Twenty20, which begins in Guyana on Friday, is just another opportunity for cricket's 10 elite Test nations to squabble over yet another trophy.

Out of dozens of associate and affiliate nations keen for a crack at the big time, there is room for just two additional qualifiers. But one of them, remarkably, is war-torn Afghanistan. The ultimate underdogs, in sport as in any walk of life, they only became recognised as a cricketing nation in 2001.

The 11 men who will take on millionaire Indian superstars like Mahendra Dhoni and Harbhajan Singh on 1 May in the idyllic tourist haven of St Lucia grew up in the bleak surroundings of the refugee camps in Pakistan, following the Soviet invasion of their homeland in 1979.

The journey from there to cricket's top table is one of the most heartening stories in sport, and one of the most unlikely...

Mark
Ottawa
 
ARTICLES FOUND APRIL 28

U.S. Troops Fill NATO Training Gap In Afghanistan
NPR/KPCV, April 27
http://scpr.org/news/2010/04/27/us-troops-fill-nato-training-gap-in-afghanistan/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+893KpccSouthernCaliforniaNews+%28KPCC%3A+News%29

The Pentagon is sending 800 more American soldiers to Afghanistan in the coming weeks to help train Afghan security forces. That's because other NATO countries still haven't fulfilled their pledges to send their own troops to train the Afghan army and police.
...
A battalion of the 82nd Airborne Division will be heading to Afghanistan in the coming weeks. The soldiers will work as trainers for at least several months. The unit is beyond the 30,000 additional troops that President Obama already approved for Afghanistan this year.

At a NATO foreign ministers meeting last week in Estonia, there was a sense of urgency about trainers for the Afghanistan forces...

NATO's commitment to the war has been hampered by dwindling political support throughout Europe. Alliance officials said during the meeting in Estonia that NATO has fallen 450 people short of a goal to supply 2,000 trainers for the Afghan National Police force by October.

But the 450 number is misleading, military officials say. They say that's the number that no NATO country has agreed to supply. The larger number is the 800 trainers that NATO had pledged to send, but are not yet in Afghanistan.

"A pledge is a pledge. It's not a person on the ground yet, performing a mission, making a difference, improving the quality of the police and the army over there," says Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, the top American trainer for the Afghan security forces.

"The challenge we have in Afghanistan is it's not boots on the ground yet," Caldwell says.

NATO nations have said they will make good on those pledges of 800 trainers sometime this year. But that's not good enough for Caldwell. He has to fill in those gaps now.

The 800 NATO trainers are part of more than 2,000 training slots Caldwell has to fill. He will fill some slots by hiring private contractors.

Contractors -- mostly from the United States, and from companies that include the private security firm DynCorp International -- are doing most of the training in Afghanistan. There are some 3,000 contract trainers, compared with about 1,000 American military instructors. NATO only has a little more than 300 trainers [emphasis added]...

Mark
OttAawa
 
Articles found April 28, 2010

Beef jerky now secret part of Canadian military rations
  Article Link
By Ian MacLeod, Ottawa Citizen

Combat troops in Afghanistan will soon be biting into more than the Taliban threat.

An Ottawa-area company has a $301,200 federal contract to supply 150,600 snack packs of beef jerky for shots of energy during combat operations.

Hero Bros. Beef Jerky will go into the Light Meal Combat packs of ready-to-eat field rations Canadian troops chow down on when more substantial Individual Meal Packs or fresh food aren't available.

But Hero Bros., citing national security, won't talk about its beef jerky.

"Canada is at war and this is part of the supply line and very sensitive," said J.D. Gustus, head of the company, run from a small office in Hammond, 35 kilometres outside downtown Ottawa.

"Somebody from the other side would look at this as part of our supply line. If you can cut off the supply lines, especially food, you can cripple the enemy.

"Where it's being made, where it's being assembled, all that kind of stuff is really sensitive." he said. "This is what the boys eat when they're under fire. If somebody was to be able to access them and poison them, you know? I'd love (the publicity) until al-Qaida shows up at my doorstep."

Hero Bros. has supplied the military with beef jerky and pepperoni sticks since 1988. Its latest contract is the first time government has required proof its supply plants have adequate security measures, said Gustus.

Details of his contract and several other recent ration deals totalling $1.98 million were posted on MERX, the government's public-tendering database. So are dozens of other military procurements, from guns and ammunition to spare mechanical parts and bottled water.
More on link

Paying the Enemy
Article Link

Amanda Lang investigates whether private security firms are using NATO money to bribe the Taliban.

Recent reports have suggested that some private security firms may be bribing the Taliban and other insurgents not to attack NATO personnel on Afghanistan's notoriously dangerous highways. Amanda Lang travels to Dubai to speak with Rateb Popal, an Afghan businessman whose security company has contracts with NATO and has also been linked to stories of bribery, about the allegations, and the industry.
Video links in article

Our Afghan comrades speak out
Article Link
POTTER: What Afghan-Canadians think of our role in Afghanistan
by Andrew Potter on Tuesday, April 27, 2010

To what extent should questions of honour, duty, and friendship enter into Canada’s foreign policy? It’s the old problem of principle versus realism, and every country needs to find its own balance between the two. It helps, though, if that balance is understood by your international partners, especially the ones you are supposedly trying to help.

The question was raised anew last weekend at the Taj Banquet Hall, a weddings/parties/everything venue attached to a Kia dealership in north Toronto where 250 or so people, most of whom were Afghan Canadians, had gathered to listen to a debate on the future of Canada’s mission to Afghanistan.

The event was organized by the Canada Afghanistan Solidarity Committee, and I was there to moderate a panel that included Bob Rae, Canada’s former ambassador to Afghanistan (and now federal Conservative nominee) Chris Alexander, and the B.C. journalist and CASC co-founder Terry Glavin. The keynote address was given by Jawed Ludin, the Afghan ambassador to Canada.

The discussion was pegged to a new paper, written by Alexander, called “Ending The Agony: Seven Moves To Stabilize Afghanistan.” In the paper, Alexander lays out what he sees as the international priorities for success in Afghanistan, which include ensuring fair elections, renewing the public service, and doing a better job coordinating the civilian and military missions.

It’s fairly obvious stuff, which is why the question at issue was not what should be done over there, but what role Canada should play. After all, while there is a parliamentary resolution requiring the termination of only our combat mission in Kandahar province, every political party in Ottawa has encouraged the widespread perception that it demands the end of our entire military mission. Meanwhile, despite various trial balloons flown from NATO headquarters and explicit requests from the Americans that we consider staying in Kandahar or maybe moving to a different province, the government has shut down the beginnings of any debate.
More on link

U.S. troops take a pounding in territory vacated by Canadians
Published On Tue Apr 27 2010
Article Link

New figures show U.S. troops have been taking serious casualties fighting in territory vacated by Canadian troops in Kandahar.

Statistics released to The Canadian Press indicate that 19 American soldiers have been killed and another 51 wounded since early December 2009.

Nine Canadian soldiers and one civilian died during the same period.

The U.S. deaths, which occurred under the command of a Canadian general, went largely unnoticed in Canada, but caught the attention of worried NATO commanders preparing for a summer offensive in Kandahar.

The U.S. has a different reporting system for casualties, one that sees news of combat deaths released days after the incidents.

Capt. Duke Reim, the commander of Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 12th U.S. Infantry Regiment, calls the last few months a roller-coaster fight in Zhari district, home to some of Canada’s biggest battles.
end

Key detainee documents still stashed in shipping containers in Afghanistan
By: Steve Rennie, THE CANADIAN PRESS 27/04/2010
Article Link

Stashed away in metal shipping containers somewhere at Kandahar Airfield are documents that could shed light on the Afghan detainee affair, an inquiry heard Tuesday.

But more than two years after public hearings were called into the prisoner controversy, the military has yet to find the paperwork and ship it back to Canada.

Instead, stacks of detainee transfer orders are "all thrown together in a storage bin, a sea container" at the military base, Maj. Denis Gagnon told the Military Police Complaints Commission.

Those transfer orders could reveal if Canadian military commanders in Afghanistan weighed the risk of torture before turning over prisoners to Afghan authorities.

Gagnon could not say precisely when the inquiry might see the transfer orders.

"The documents in theatre are far more difficult to find because of the constant rotation of our personnel," he said.

"Plus ... with the current tempo of our operation, they don't have the ability to ... dedicate the proper troops to task in order to properly identify all those documents that may be co-located with many other documents."

Word of the documents' existence emerged as Paul Champ, a lawyer for two civil-rights groups, grilled Gagnon and Brig. Gen. Richard Blanchette.

Gagnon told the commission the military has dispatched a team to Kandahar Airfield to determine how long it will take to find the transfer orders and other detainee documents.

Acting commission chair Glenn Stannard asked why the transfer orders weren't included in the paperwork that has already been turned over to the inquiry.

"I don't have an answer for you, sir," Gagnon said.

The transfer orders are just some of the documents caught in a bureaucratic paper jam that threatens to sideline the inquiry.
More on link
 
Articles found April 29, 2010

Canadian troops rotate in advance of summer offensive
  Article Link
By Ethan Baron, Canwest News ServiceApril 28, 2010

SPERWAN GHAR, Afghanistan — Canada's new command group for the front-line combat base arrived in Afghanistan Wednesday, as troops from the Royal Canadian Regiment of Petawawa, Ont., take over from the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry of Edmonton.

The new rotation of soldiers arrived in advance of NATO's upcoming summer Kandahar province offensive, planned to be the largest-ever in the war.

C Company from the Royal Canadian Regiment (RCR), posted to the fortified hill base here, is expected to be charged with pushing the Taliban from west Panjwaii district, a key insurgent stronghold.

"Our company is very well prepared, very well trained," said Capt. Stephen Good, second in command of the RCR's C Company.

In his previous tour, Good moved around several volatile districts.

Now, Canadian combat troops are working almost exclusively in Panjwaii, attempting to secure population centres by keeping a solid presence in a more limited area.

"In 2007, it was all kinetic operations, all disruption — we never held the ground, and we never stayed with the population. We didn't have enough manpower," said Good, originally from Coquitlam, B.C.

Outgoing Princess Patricia's troops engaged in frequent fighting in the first part of their seven-to-eight-month tour, then endured an escalating threat from improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

"It's time to go home," said Sgt. Mark Courtney, originally from Sydney, N.S., and posted to Edmonton for 10 years. "You get excited. It's almost like Christmas."

Courtney also fought with C Company in 2006, when Canadian combat troops were highly mobile, operating from the field and from scattered encampments.

"They were really two different missions. There are a lot more troops on the ground now. The insurgents aren't as willing to fight us," he said. "In 2006, we were something new and they wanted to have their go at us. Now they're a bit more cautious."

The Taliban are increasingly using IEDs against Canadian foot patrols, putting them in paths, walls and trees, in addition to planting them in roads to target vehicles, said Courtney.

He, along with three other soldiers, narrowly escaped a blast of shrapnel from a remote-detonated IED. "It went between two of us."

Princess Patricia's C Company arrived in Afghanistan in October, and moved in December to this base in west Panjwaii — a few hundred metres from a broad Taliban-held zone with what soldiers call "the heart of darkness" at its centre: the town of Zangabad.
More on link

Canadian Forces launch probe after Afghan family claims slain teen was unarmed
By Murray Brewster (CP) – 17 hours ago
Article Link

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — Canadian military police have launched a formal investigation into allegations by family members that a 17-year-old Afghan boy was unarmed when he was shot and killed by soldiers during a night-time raid three years ago.

Maj. Cindy Tessier, a spokeswoman for Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Walter Natynczyk, confirmed Wednesday that the military is conducting a "thorough and detailed" examination of claims that the boy had no weapon when he was shot in the back of the head during a June 2007 raid outside of Kandahar city.

Two of the victim's brothers, who say they witnessed the shooting, told The Canadian Press how their frightened sibling was running away from foreign troops was he was gunned down during what they described as a botched hunt for insurgents.

Baryalai, who like many Afghans goes by only one name, said they were sleeping on the roof of their compound in the village of Hazaragi Baba, northwest of Kandahar city, on a warm summer night in June 2007 when soldiers burst in.

The noise and the yelling spooked 17-year-old Janan, who ran.

"He got up (and) was too nervous because of the situation," Baryalai said through a translator. "He was getting downstairs (and) before they ask any question(s), they shot him."

The investigation marks a stunning reversal for Natynczyk, whose letter to a special House of Commons committee denied the allegations of Ahmadshah Malgarai, who served as a cultural adviser to the general in charge of Task Force Kandahar in 2007.
More on link

Opium harvest a no-win situation for Canadian troops in Afghanistan
  Article Link
By Ethan Baron, Canwest News ServiceApril 25, 2010

KHAIRO KALA, Afghanistan — Opium harvesting has just begun in the area where the Canadian Forces operate in Afghanistan, with boys and men collecting the drug that has become a primary revenue source for the Taliban.

“We know that in some of the areas, the profit does make its way into insurgent hands,” said Canadian Forces Maj. Wade Niven, whose area of command in eastern Panjwaii district contains two villages where poppies make up a third to a half of the cropland.

“The Canadian national policy prevents us from doing too much about it.”

The harvest begins about two weeks after the pink-and-white or crimson petals have fallen from the bulbous seed pods. Workers slit the swollen pods, and once the milky opium sap has bled out and congealed overnight into a sticky brown paste, they scrape it off with a tool resembling a short ladle with a sharp edge. Smears and blobs of the paste on the workers’ hands are diligently scraped into the tool’s reservoir. Pods are scored and scraped repeatedly over several days.

“It is the hard truth that as the Taliban becomes more well equipped and funded through the opiate industry . . . stabilization will become increasingly difficult and casualties will rise for NATO troops, Afghan civilians, police and military,” said a 2009 Atlantic Council of Canada report.

Afghanistan produces 90 per cent of the world’s opium, and the Taliban and other insurgent groups reap $90 million to $160 million a year from taxing poppy farmers and importers of chemicals used to refine the drug, and imposing fees on laboratory processors and transporters, the United Nations has reported.
More on link
 
Pentagon says instability in Afghanistan has '‘leveled off'
Washington Post, April 29
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/28/AR2010042805747.html

The Afghan government can count on popular support only in a quarter of the main urban areas and other districts that are considered key to winning the war with the Taliban and other insurgents, the Pentagon said in a report delivered to Congress on Wednesday.

In the status report on the war in Afghanistan, the Defense Department said that years of rising instability had "leveled off" since January and that the number of Afghans who see their government heading in the right direction has increased.

The report stops short of declaring that the tide has turned in a nine-year war in which the Taliban has made a strong comeback since it was toppled from power after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks...

A major obstacle facing the U.S. counterinsurgency strategy is persuading skeptical Afghans that the central government deserves their allegiance over the Taliban. In an assessment of 121 Afghan districts that it considers crucial to winning the war, the U.S. military found that only about one-quarter -- or 29 districts -- could be classified as sympathetic to the government.

In comparison, 48 of the districts were classified as supportive of or sympathetic to the Taliban, a proportion basically unchanged since December. The remainder of the districts was rated "neutral," meaning that their sympathies were considered up for grabs.

One bright spot in the report is that a majority of Afghans surveyed in March thought their government was "headed in the right direction," an increase of eight percentage points from September, around the time when national elections were widely criticized by international observers as fraudulent.

Views on government corruption, however, "continue to be decidedly negative," the report found, with 83 percent of Afghans reporting that corruption affected their daily lives -- an increase of four percentage points from September...

Afghan Taliban getting stronger, Pentagon says
A Pentagon assessment, while expressing confidence in U.S. strategy, says the movement has flourished despite repeated assaults.

LA Times, April 29
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-fg-0429-us-afghan-20100429,0,2848935.story?track=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+latimes%2Fmostviewed+%28L.A.+Times+-+Most+Viewed+Stories%29

A Pentagon report presented a sobering new assessment Wednesday of the Taliban-led insurgency in Afghanistan, saying that its abilities are expanding and its operations are increasing in sophistication, despite recent major offensives by U.S. forces in the militants' heartland.

The report, requested by Congress, portrays an insurgency with deep roots and broad reach, able to withstand repeated U.S. onslaughts and to reestablish its influence, while discrediting and undermining the country's Western-backed government.

But the Pentagon said it remained optimistic that its counter-insurgency strategy, formed after an Obama administration review last year, and its effort to peel foot soldiers away from the Taliban will show success in months to come...

The new report offers a grim take on the likely difficulty of establishing lasting security, especially in southern Afghanistan, where the insurgency enjoys broad support. The conclusions raise the prospect that the insurgency in the south may never be completely vanquished, but instead must be contained to prevent it from threatening the government of President Hamid Karzai.

The report concludes that Afghan people support or are sympathetic to the insurgency in 92 of 121 districts identified by the U.S. military as key terrain for stabilizing the country. Popular support for Karzai's government is strong in only 29 of those districts, it concludes...

...The official acknowledged the assessment of the insurgency was more pessimistic than in previous assessments. "This is a very serious and sober report," he said...

U.S. and allied officials have stressed the importance of improving the Afghan security forces. But the report notes that efforts to enhance the Afghan national army have made "slow progress" over the last year, due largely to "high attrition and low retention" of recruits.

U.S. commanders said Afghan troops who supported Marines in the battle to end Taliban control of Marja early this year were better than those who fought in similar circumstances last year, but still need much more training.

Brig. Gen. Larry Nicholson, the Marine commander in the Marja operation, said he would give some Afghan units an A-minus or B-plus. But others, particularly those with soldiers fresh from basic training, performed much worse...

Mark
Ottawa
 
“Cautiously Optimistic"- the Pentagon Report
Conference of Defence Associations' media round-up, April 30
http://www.cdaforumcad.ca/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1272653072/0#0

Mark
Ottawa
 
Back
Top