McG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 3,709
- Points
- 1,260
At this pace, Russia will exceed a million casualties before spring.
If that’s correct, every 12 days they lose a division of men.At this pace, Russia will exceed a million casualties before spring.
At this pace, Russia will exceed a million casualties before spring.
Go Team USSR 2.0 - aim high!At this pace, Russia will exceed a million casualties before spring.
The truest believers will just say "time to spend the money at home & let Europe do Europe."Anyone who thinks that the fall of Ukraine wouldn’t effect Trump like Afghanistan effected Biden is dreaming in Technicolor. And Putin doesn’t want a deal.
![]()
Trump Is Facing a Catastrophic Defeat in Ukraine
If Ukraine falls, it will be hard to spin as anything but a debacle for the United States, and for its president.www.theatlantic.com
I think you misread DJT in some of this.Trump makes deals. He's a businessman. Thats what he does. He's running the U.S. like a business, right?
One problem: Ukraine isn't his to barter with Putin.
He doesn't have to face the repercussions if Russia reneges on the deal and continues to attack Ukraine. Additionally, his posturing about using military and economy force to annex other countries (rhetoric or not) sends a loud message across the world that the Great Game is back on in full force.
You'll see China make a move for Taiwan. You'll see Pakistan and India finally settle scores in Kashmir. Iran will have nothing left to lose in the Middle East. It won't end.
In "The Art of the Deal", he speaks heavily about leverage being the one thing you never negotiate without. In Ukraine, he has no leverage that is discernable to negotiate a peace; only the ability to give concessions to try and appease Putin.
Can anyone explain to me in simple terms why we went exclusively F35 instead of Grippen E/F or a blend of the two?
Can anyone explain to me in simple terms why we went exclusively F35 instead of Grippen E/F or a blend of the two?
Go ask the Iranians about the F35's and if they are effective.Can anyone explain to me in simple terms why we went exclusively F35 instead of Grippen E/F or a blend of the two?
Some C's are on their way and long-term that is what they have said they want as their primary fighter/attack aircraft - so I started reading up on them and foud the video.But why in the Ukraine War thread ?
They are in some roles, not others, and not as the sole aircraft. Ukraine does not need many to satisfy any future NATO interoperability requirements and is not in the power projection club needing a deep penetration capability. Their future wars are all going to be primarily above them or within several hundred miles of their borders. The short/rough field and easy to operate with recent/poorly trained ground crews is a better operational fit than a maintenance and tech heavy runway queen. I doubt Ukraine will keep more than a squadron of F16 when it comes time to buy what they want. And Gripen is better than Mirage or Viper for their needs. Not purely my opinion, ask Dr. Justin Bronk.Go ask the Iranians about the F35's and if they are effective.
Oh fuck…here we go…again…
So, you answered your own question. Strategic context matters when choosing a fighter aircraft.They are in some roles, not others, and not as the sole aircraft. Ukraine does not need many to satisfy any future NATO interoperability requirements and is not in the power projection club needing a deep penetration capability. Their future wars are all going to be primarily above them or within several hundred miles of their borders. The short/rough field and easy to operate with recent/poorly trained ground crews is a better operational fit than a maintenance and tech heavy runway queen. I doubt Ukraine will keep more than a squadron of F16 when it comes time to buy what they want. And Gripen is better than Mirage or Viper for their needs. Not purely my opinion, ask Dr. Justin Bronk.
They are in some roles, not others, and not as the sole aircraft. Ukraine does not need many to satisfy any future NATO interoperability requirements and is not in the power projection club needing a deep penetration capability. Their future wars are all going to be primarily above them or within several hundred miles of their borders. The short/rough field and easy to operate with recent/poorly trained ground crews is a better operational fit than a maintenance and tech heavy runway queen. I doubt Ukraine will keep more than a squadron of F16 when it comes time to buy what they want. And Gripen is better than Mirage or Viper for their needs. Not purely my opinion, ask Dr. Justin Bronk.