true but was anything they printed erroneous information? Were their conclusions biased?It's known as the 'Tory-graph' for a reason, though
Trudeau Popularity - or not (various polling, etc.)
- Thread starter daftandbarmy
- Start date
lots of arguments on crime on both sides. So look at the number of small businesses closing down because of vandalism and theft.
Jarnhamar
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 6,648
- Points
- 1,160
Unless their style is to provide no substance? I'm drowning here
I'm not a big stat guru. It seems like crime is getting worse in Canada.
Sure that makes sense.
Oldgateboatdriver
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,825
- Points
- 1,010
Here is something that will be seen as "hurt" by Canadians and will come out in the fall: Recession.
It's already here but most people don't know it yet. How do I know? I work in what is considered the construction industry - I handle receiving for a large Hardware/construction materiel provider in Quebec. We, and all our competitors (we compete but we also check on each other's dealings and work together on some aspects of the industry when needed) are down about 20% on sales targets since the beginning of the summer just about all of that in the actual construction industry sales, as opposed to individuals in store purchases.
When you have such a downturn in the construction industry, it is the first sign that you have entered a recession.
It's already here but most people don't know it yet. How do I know? I work in what is considered the construction industry - I handle receiving for a large Hardware/construction materiel provider in Quebec. We, and all our competitors (we compete but we also check on each other's dealings and work together on some aspects of the industry when needed) are down about 20% on sales targets since the beginning of the summer just about all of that in the actual construction industry sales, as opposed to individuals in store purchases.
When you have such a downturn in the construction industry, it is the first sign that you have entered a recession.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 29,556
- Points
- 1,160
It just tends to be a little too one sided.... I like the Economist better, mainly because it seems a little more balanced e.g.,
Canada’s miserly defence spending is increasingly embarrassing
Even after the invasion of Ukraine, the country doles out just 1.22% of GDP
Despite its renowned special forces and stalwart service in Afghanistan, Canada has long been seen by its allies as something of a laggard when it comes to its defence spending. Many Canadians still recall an excruciating exchange between Donald Trump, then president of the United States, and Canada’s Liberal prime minister, Justin Trudeau, at a nato summit in 2019 when Mr Trump asked jeeringly: “Where are you at? What is your number?” Mr Trudeau had more friends at that summit than Mr Trump. But since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Canada’s position as a penny-pinching outlier has become more embarrassing for the country.The statement of Jens Stoltenberg, nato’s secretary-general, before the nato summit in Vilnius this month that spending 2% of national gdp on defence was no longer to be regarded as the “the ceiling” but “the floor” could have been designed to cause blushes in Ottawa. According to the alliance’s latest data on defence spending, Canada’s defence budget amounted to just 1.22% of its gdp in 2022. That puts it in the same company as Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Spain and Turkey—a country whose commitment to nato is at best shaky. All spend less than 1.4% of gdp on defence (see chart).
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, even former military slowcoach Germany announced its determination to meet its 2% obligation. But Mr Trudeau has not shown much enthusiasm for bridging the gap. Leaked Pentagon intelligence documents, first reported in the Washington Post in April, confirmed that Mr Trudeau had told nato allies not only that Canada would not reach the 2% commitment but that it “never” would. When Mr Trudeau was asked to confirm or deny the remark, he blandly replied: “I continue to say and will always say that Canada is a reliable partner to nato, a reliable partner around the world. And with our military investments, with the support we give to Canadians, we will continue to be doing that.”
The gulf between what Mr Trudeau intends and what nato expects is indeed a large one. Last year the parliamentary budget officer, Yves Giroux, estimated that Canada would need to spend an additional C$75.3bn ($57bn) before the end of 2027 to get to the 2% target.
Yet, while Mr Trudeau remains seemingly unrepentant that his government ranks defence and security behind social spending, some effort is being put into presenting a more reassuring picture to Canada’s allies. Last year, in the immediate aftermath of Russia’s invasion, the government said it was undertaking a defence-policy review in the light of the changing security environment. When Canada’s foreign minister, Mélanie Joly, was confronted in an interview ahead of the Vilnius summit about Mr Stoltenberg’s demand for more spending, she suggested that the defence review would reflect the need “to make sure that we step up our game”.
However, the review is now not expected to report until next year, and any new procurements that may stem from it will be subject to delays, which in Canada’s case tend to be long. Earlier this year the government finally signed a deal to spend C$19bn on 88 f-35 fighter jets, some 13 years after the decision of the former Conservative government to buy the stealth aircraft. When campaigning to be prime minister in 2015 Mr Trudeau said he would cancel the deal. Once in power, however, he opened it up to a bidding process (which was in essence for show, as Lockheed pretty much has a monopoly on the market for the most advanced fighters).
The politicisation of procurement decisions is not the only issue Canada’s defence budget faces. Another problem is that the Department of National Defence (dnd) has a poor record in spending the money it has been given. According to a recently leaked dnd internal report, staffing at the department’s acquisitions arm is about 30% under strength, with 4,200 jobs vacant at the end of May last year. None of this bodes well for Canada’s navy, which is chugging along with 30-year-old frigates and just four former British Royal Navy submarines that are even older.
A reason often given for Canada’s reluctance to invest in its armed forces is that it is a long way from Europe and that the United States will always have its back. But even if Ukraine is distant from Canada, neither Russia nor China is. As Canadians are grimly aware, global warming is opening up Arctic sea lanes and making the High North an increasingly contestable strategic region. Both Russia and China are showing a close interest in Canada’s backyard. If the navy is to respond to this, the money will have to be found for new frigates and submarines to give it a persistent presence in harsh conditions.
After Mr Trudeau visited South Korea in May there was speculation that the Canadian navy, which wants 12 new submarines, would push for that country’s highly capable kss-III. The submarine programme could cost around C$60bn. The navy is also hoping to get 15 new Type-26 frigates, which would cost between C$60bn and C$84bn. But such decisions must await the conclusions of the review.
The paradox of Mr Trudeau’s determination to brush aside his nato spending obligations is that the country actually has a growing appetite for an enhanced security role. Polls suggest that there is support for higher defence spending, particularly among older voters. And although delayed, the f-35 purchase and the infrastructure that goes with it are a major commitment, with a total cost of about C$70bn. So too is Canada’s agreement to a nato plan for it to to lead a brigade-strength force in Latvia by 2026. Canada has also pledged to invest nearly C$40bn in norad, the North American air-defence system, over the next 20 years. But the first and last of these undertakings will occur over the long term. The funding for them will be spread out over several decades.
Whatever Mr Trudeau thinks about the nato 2% threshold, he and Anita Anand, Canada’s outgoing defence minister, have publicly committed themselves to spending more in the future. The much-touted defence review should identify what capabilities Canada needs. But the damage done by decades of complacency and neglect by governments of both parties will take many years to rectify. The consequence will be a growing tension between budgetary constraints and strategic ambition. One or the other will have to give.
Canada’s miserly defence spending is increasingly embarrassing
Brad Sallows
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 7,934
- Points
- 1,040
Although I'm a strong proponent of read-and-evaluate, bear in mind you can't evaluate omitted information, which tends to be that which doesn't support the author's thesis.
- Reaction score
- 20,247
- Points
- 1,360
Counting on China’s Executive Vice Chairperson of its China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development.
Very interested to see who is perpetuating the violent crime? Also interested to see more detail of “overall crime is down.”
As Jarnhammer noted as well, violent crim in Canada immediately reversed a decade+ reduction trend and immediately started climbing after Trudeau took power. The only time it slightly reversed was with the COVID lockdowns.
Happy Guy
Full Member
- Reaction score
- 588
- Points
- 810
I don't think the PM J. Trudeau or the current core Lib power centre ever understood that intertwined dependency of diplomacy, strong military power and prowess, and foreign aid - one can achieve their strategic goals by the adroit use of all three. You cannot skimp on these. A strong diplomatic corps needs to be backed up a the implied threat of the military and the financial incentive of foreign aid. If they did, they certainly failed on their execution. They could look upon the USA , the UK, FRA and the former USSR as examples.
PM J. Trudeau's attempts to be prominent player on the global stage has made lead the other world's leaders to ignore him. Making virtuous comments without backing them up has led to Canada being left out on foreign policy decisions by the major world players.
To be fair I don't think that the other two Canadian major political parties' leders would make any useful contribution to the world's stage either other than virtue signalling like PM J. Trudeau.
Point taken. My recollection of non violent stil being lower than before intermixed. I’ll check my facts next time.Counting on China’s Executive Vice Chairperson of its China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development.
Very interested to see who is perpetuating the violent crime? Also interested to see more detail of “overall crime is down.”
Not disputing that violent crime isn’t up.
The source you are using it adresses that indigenous and racialized Canadians are way over represented in terms of violent crimes.Counting on China’s Executive Vice Chairperson of its China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development.
Very interested to see who is perpetuating the violent crime? Also interested to see more detail of “overall crime is down.”
As Jarnhammer noted as well, violent crim in Canada immediately reversed a decade+ reduction trend and immediately started climbing after Trudeau took power. The only time it slightly reversed was with the COVID lockdowns.
View attachment 79587
Still doesn’t address the need or lack thereof of a policy plan for a political party. But I accept your numbers on this issue.
this is why I don’t vote based on defence issues. I don’t trust either or any of them to live up to whatever they say about it.
- Reaction score
- 20,247
- Points
- 1,360
Statistics Canada… if you can’t trust your government, who can you trust?
Like I said. I accept your source.
- Reaction score
- 20,247
- Points
- 1,360
My point was to reiterate the source, that you had implied was biased through over-representation of indigenous and racial used Canadians. I would contend that StatsCan is neutrally compiling statistics and not trying to inject any particular biases one way or the other. Would you suggest it would be more appropriate to remove indigenous and racialized persons from the statistics? I suppose that would make Canada look less violent.
I didn’t imply it was biased at all. Please explain that? I said I accepted your source. Not that it was biased.
Trust me when I say I whole heartedly back any presentation here on this site that stats can is neutral and not trying to inject any bias. Nor would I suggest it wasn’t.
My original point was that while violent crime is up, it is disproportionately in and by certain groups and communities.
- Reaction score
- 7,805
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 20,247
- Points
- 1,360
I saw nowhere where that breakout of data was made by StatsCan
It’s in the main article of the source you used. It delves into the homicide rate for indigenous and racialized groups. Right under the slight rise in hate crimes section.
Again, where did I imply any bias?
- Reaction score
- 20,247
- Points
- 1,360
Sorry, I thought you were referring to the StatsCan site.
It is the stats can site. Click on the Back To Main Article on the chapter page you posted. It breaks things down by crime (interestingly they include traffic crimes) and other numbers.
- Reaction score
- 20,247
- Points
- 1,360
I see it now, the page code had all those sections collapsed for me, I had just seen the uppermost chart and supporting table, but I note the section of the further broken down data. I still see the portrayal of that data as factual in nature by StatsCan.
Ironically, are we to infer that indigenous and racialized peoples have life worse now under Trudeau? That would be an inconvenient development…I mean more inconvenient even than all the violent weapons-related crimes not involving any legally-licensed weapons.
Similar threads
