• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Have you considered the US recognizes it can no longer fight a two front war (Rus and China) and win and is now trying to compel the rest of the free world to anti-up?
Of course.
The US isn't abandoning it's allies, it's forcing them to pull their weight and stop free-loading.
No. There is an abandonment. Part of their new reality I guess. The freeloading was set up by the US btw. They set those conditions. What they will need to accept is going forward that their influence will be diminished.
The EU alone should be able to handle Russia but until now they've sat on their haunches. Moreover, the US is trying to get control of it's spending (defence being a huge part of that) and transfer some of the defence responsibility to those who should be paying and therefore reducing what the US spends.
They should yes. But deep down the US is sucking and blowing at the same time.
Shifting our military alliance to a farther and more complicated supply chain is silly. It is the "elbows up" of the defence world, an emotional response designed for public consumption.
No. It’s a new reality not tie ourselves to an erratic country south of us. No need to completely cut off things but expansion elsewhere is what is needed. On our terms. Diversification is the way to go. The US as shown exactly why that is.

The only emotional response are from those who lecture about sovereignty and pulling our weight etc and being upset when steps are being taken to do that that does not included the very thing we need to be independent from.
 
A rare dual win for the P2025 crew, they get to get Americans ill AND stupid with this move. BZ!
Some seem to think the former CDC was an edict, not a recommendation. As far as I know, people are still free to get, or not get a Covid vaccine. It also seems that the medical professionals actually trained and practicing in the related fields of pediatrics and Obstetrics disagree with him. They must be all on the take. Maybe Trump will withhold funding from medical colleges who disagree with him.
 
Bold move - let's see how China responds.
 
Bold move - let's see how China responds.
Hoo boy. This one could get wild.
 
I don't know what you know on this subject, but what is your position? Do you prefer the status quo?

It's widely known that China sends students and academics to spy on the West but, ironically, Western schools rely heavily on the money they bring in...

Students or spies? How China infiltrated US universities​



Nearly 277,000 Chinese students in American universities stare at an uncertain future as the United States will start "aggressively" revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields. The Trump administration last week cited Harvard University's ties to China as among several reasons for revoking its ability to enroll foreign students, a move temporarily blocked by a US judge. The number of Chinese students in the US, a Reuters report said, dropped to about 277,000 in 2024 from a high of around 370,000 in 2019, pulled lower by growing tension between the world's two biggest economies, heightened US government scrutiny of Chinese students, and the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the past decade or so, a large number of cases have come up in which Chinese students, researchers and professors were found to be spying for the Chinese government or were linked to the Chinese military, the People's Liberation Army (PLA). It is now commonly known that China has done pilferage of American technology and research at a huge scale to ramp up its industry and military. The US universities have become high-value targets in China's broader campaign of intellectual property theft and intelligence gathering. The academic environment—open, collaborative, and largely unguarded—has proven fertile ground for covert operations conducted under the cover of education and research.

 
International students, particularly from countries with larger populations, are vital to the interests of the US, provided it can entice most of them to remain in the US. That is how the US can maintain a strategic advantage on the bleeding edges of everything despite a smaller population.

However, that generous education policy is counterproductive if students are a significant gateway for espionage or do not mostly remain in the US.
 
... Western schools rely heavily on the money they bring in...
Also in part (but not entirely) because of government policies cutting back funding for domestic students, hence the delicate balancing act. Same dynamic here in Canada, too.

LATE ADD: Lookit who's on his way out the door ....
 
Last edited:
I know enough that I very much do not prefer the status quo. I just think this is gonna go over like a wet fart in church with China.
China is basically Russia without the overt territory grabs and war, which some people think might change within a year (Taiwan). Should we worry about how either will respond to such provocations, or go ahead and tell them to suck it up or behave?
 
China is basically Russia without the overt territory grabs and war, which some people think might change within a year (Taiwan). Should we worry about how either will respond to such provocations, or go ahead and tell them to suck it up or behave?
You’re presenting a false either/or. Western nations should gauge what’s in our best interests based on our best assessment of likely adversary responses, do the things that assess to be in our best interests based but then remain concerned about and attentive to what the other guy does- it may not match our expectations, and the math might change in ways we weren’t anticipating.

China has a way of looking at things holistically and on very long time frames that we struggle with.
 
Back
Top