- Reaction score
- 25,740
- Points
- 1,360
Yup.Probably about time, no?
Yup.Probably about time, no?
A panel of judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade found the tariffs were unlawful and permanently vacated them.
Hoo boy. This one could get wild.Bold move - let's see how China responds.
![]()
Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the US will begin revoking the visas of Chinese students
Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the U.S. will begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students, “including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.”apnews.com
![]()
US pauses student visa processing amid plans to up social media vetting
Latest Trump administration move comes amid wider pressure campaign against top universities, targeting of students.www.aljazeera.com
![]()
US will begin revoking visas of Chinese students: Secretary of state
The US will also ‘enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications’ from China and Hong Kong, the State Department said.www.aljazeera.com
![]()
China condemns US decision to revoke student visas
Foreign ministry hits back at ‘political and discriminatory’ move announced by Marco Rubiowww.theguardian.com
Hoo boy. This one could get wild.
I don't know what you know on this subject, but what is your position? Do you prefer the status quo?
Also in part (but not entirely) because of government policies cutting back funding for domestic students, hence the delicate balancing act. Same dynamic here in Canada, too.... Western schools rely heavily on the money they bring in...
I would not want to be a Caucasian US businessman visiting China during this spate....Hoo boy. This one could get wild.
I know enough that I very much do not prefer the status quo. I just think this is gonna go over like a wet fart in church with China.I don't know what you know on this subject, but what is your position? Do you prefer the status quo?
China is basically Russia without the overt territory grabs and war, which some people think might change within a year (Taiwan). Should we worry about how either will respond to such provocations, or go ahead and tell them to suck it up or behave?I know enough that I very much do not prefer the status quo. I just think this is gonna go over like a wet fart in church with China.
You’re presenting a false either/or. Western nations should gauge what’s in our best interests based on our best assessment of likely adversary responses, do the things that assess to be in our best interests based but then remain concerned about and attentive to what the other guy does- it may not match our expectations, and the math might change in ways we weren’t anticipating.China is basically Russia without the overt territory grabs and war, which some people think might change within a year (Taiwan). Should we worry about how either will respond to such provocations, or go ahead and tell them to suck it up or behave?
Tibet and Hong Kong might like a few words.China is basically Russia without the overt territory grabs and war, which some people think might change within a year (Taiwan).
China has a way of having civil wars when it gets too big for the rulers in the centre to effectively impose their authority everywhere.You’re presenting a false either/or. Western nations should gauge what’s in our best interests based on our best assessment of likely adversary responses, do the things that assess to be in our best interests based but then remain concerned about and attentive to what the other guy does- it may not match our expectations, and the math might change in ways we weren’t anticipating.
China has a way of looking at things holistically and on very long time frames that we struggle with.
Not sure what you’re replying to exactly. It certainly doesn’t address anything I’ve actually said.China has a way of having civil wars when it gets too big for the rulers in the centre to effectively impose their authority everywhere.
Appeasement and co-operation makes their position stronger. Then I suppose we'd "gauge our interests", find our position weakening, and order up more appeasement and co-operation. Etc.
Probably not. I'm addressing the "must punish Russia" / "must accommodate China" crowd. Both governments pose similar threats. Accommodation works cyclically - the more you accommodate, the more powerful they become, and the more you must accommodate. Problems are best solved while small, so don't accommodate when the threat is obvious. Even Russia hasn't managed the degree of political and industrial interference that China does.Not sure what you’re replying to exactly. It certainly doesn’t address anything I’ve actually said.
Got it. I mistakenly took your post to suggest I was advancing the position you were describing. Assuredly not.Probably not. I'm addressing the "must punish Russia" / "must accommodate China" crowd. Both governments pose similar threats. Accommodation works cyclically - the more you accommodate, the more powerful they become, and the more you must accommodate. Problems are best solved while small, so don't accommodate when the threat is obvious. Even Russia hasn't managed the degree of political and industrial interference that China does.
US study visa holders MUST leave within 60 days of the end of their studies. They are considered temporary residents.International students, particularly from countries with larger populations, are vital to the interests of the US, provided it can entice most of them to remain in the US. That is how the US can maintain a strategic advantage on the bleeding edges of everything despite a smaller population.
However, that generous education policy is counterproductive if students are a significant gateway for espionage or do not mostly remain in the US.