• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

dapaterson said:
Totally normal behavior here. Using an executive order to direct the agents of the state to attack a law firm that worked for an opponent.

Rule of law is highly overrated, apparently.

www.whitehouse.gov

Addressing Risks from Perkins Coie LLP

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose. The
www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
Click to expand...
Woooooowwwww.

I mean, not surprising that he’d do this… But wow. The legal action on this will be entertaining.
 
daftandbarmy said:
Tough on US truckers,
Click to expand...

If B.C. is set up like the States, commercial veh’s have to pay a fuel “use tax” for the diesel they burn while transversing, even if they don’t buy any in that area.
 
Got to love provincial politicians... provincial...snort no kidding.
I wonder if any of them realize just how utterly insignificant some of them are .
And that there are people are watching them and do hear what they say .
I wonder how long it will be , before some of start to grumble about lowered interprovincial trade barriers and why they think that they're a good thing .....
..
 
Eby is a huge asshole. Yes he banned US liquor sales in BC, but only US liquor from states that voted Republican i.e. Burbon from Kentucky, but not wine from California.

Shows how this idiot "thinks".
 
QV said:
There were no subversive acts in Donald's first term hey? Ok then.
Click to expand...
Of course there were; a bunch of people were convicted of sedition. Trump either pardoned or commuted the sentences of all of them though, and he succesfully ran the clock on his own trials.

But you weren’t talking about that. You were replying to a specific post about a specific executive order targeting a specific law firm with repressive executive action that will not ultimately stand up to legal scrutiny. It doesn’t get much more blatantly corrupt than specifically going after a law firm for providing legal services to the person who led the criminal investigation into Trump for election subversion and criminal mishandling of classified documents.
 
brihard said:
Of course there were; a bunch of people were convicted of sedition. Trump either pardoned or commuted the sentences of all of them though, and he succesfully ran the clock on his own trials.

But you weren’t talking about that. You were replying to a specific post about a specific executive order targeting a specific law firm with repressive executive action that will not ultimately stand up to legal scrutiny. It doesn’t get much more blatantly corrupt than specifically going after a law firm for providing legal services to the person who led the criminal investigation into Trump for election subversion and criminal mishandling of classified documents.
Click to expand...

That is a tidy spin of the Clinton/DNC financed Russia Collusion Hoax and all that went with that. Lets just continue to disagree on what is considered malfeasance not yet dealt with vs alleged malfeasance rigorously investigated and not achieving a prosecution.
 
QV said:
That is a tidy spin of the Clinton/DNC financed Russia Collusion Hoax and all that went with that. Lets just continue to disagree on what is considered malfeasance not yet dealt with vs alleged malfeasance rigorously investigated and not achieving a prosecution.
Click to expand...
And if the administration feels they can justify targeting a law firm for purported malfeasance in that, I’m quite sure they’ll have the opportunity to show their work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top