• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

There’s a saying down south that a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich.

Not anymore.


No indictment against man accused of throwing sandwich at CBP agent: Sources​

Prosecutors failed to secure an indictment against the man accused of throwing a sandwich at a Customs and Border Patrol agent in Washington, D.C., sources familiar with the matter confirmed to ABC News on Wednesday.

Also…

Prosecutors similarly failed to convince a federal grand jury in D.C. to indict a woman, Sidney Reid, accused by the government of assaulting and FBI agent during an inmate swap with ICE, despite three separate attempts.

Back to the sandwich thrower…

The White House went as far as releasing a video showing a cadre of heavily armed agents carrying out his arrest, despite his attorney saying he had previously offered to surrender willingly.
 
There’s a saying down south that a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich.

Not anymore.





Also…



Back to the sandwich thrower…
Good. That was an absolute farce. He was a drunken idiot who deserves a liquor ticket and maybe a night in the drunk tank. Instead they tried to go full federal on him including a super cringey high resolution video of a full tactical raid on his residence. Even within the law enforcement community - and I’m in some US-dominated LEO-only social media space - we were almost universally saying it was embarassing. That drunk idiot winning the foot pursuit and getting away wasn’t any better.

This is the video the White House posted of the raid on the sandwich-thrower. This is after he can contacted them and offered to turn himself in mind you.

 

Sounds like Trump made the right call.
Well no shit, if you temporarily and unsustainably flood an area with police you’re going to see crime go down in that patch of ground for the time that surge is sustained. Any of us who did time in Kandahar were playing a similar game. But it won’t be sustained. FBI, HSI, CBP etc all have their actual work to do and it’s not getting done. Every day some FBI guy is standing on a corner in DC getting beaked off at by a drunk, they aren’t investigating extremism, cybercrime, child porn, counterintelligence… And the federal deployment ends at the municipal borders of DC. They don’t cross the street (literally) into the neighbouring municipalities. It would be like dumping the federal portion of the RCMP into policing Vancouver but meanwhile everything just temporarily flows from the downtown east side into Burnaby or Richmond or Surrey.

Once this deployment ends - and it must and will - there will be a reversion to the norm (which as a reminder was already decreasing crime rates). And in the meantime a whole bunch of actual federal criminal files will have been neglected.

Total amateur hour. It’s not an actual law enforcement initiative; it’s a federal administration continuing to figure out what buttons it can press to normalize and legitimize federal overreach. They still haven’t said, if the deployment was already making DC safe, then by it was necessary to newly arm the Guard members there.

But at least they got a great video of the tactical raid on the drunken sandwich artist after he offered to turn himself in and before the grand jury declined to indict.
 
Poke, poke, poke ...

More than just the CAN judge according to the State Dep't info-machine - highlights mine
View attachment 95324
state.gov Fact Sheet attached
And Canadian jurists await Canada's response to the poking ....
 
And Canadian jurists await Canada's response to the poking ....
Probably a case of picking our battles. There’s no win in this one, nor any likelihood we can budge the U.S. position on the ICC where their investigations implicate U.S. personnel or allies. We have plenty more Canadians working for them who face this risk too. Unfortunately it’s a reality at this point that working for international bodies in a manner deemed contrary to U.S. policy or interests brings a sanctions risk.
 
Not really. See here for a dose of proportion and reason. Note particularly the US's own history of using trade policy to support diplomatic policy.
The government having a vote and stake is peak state capitalism. If the US wants to be the Peoples Republic of China Peoples Republic of America thats their business but lets not pretend its normal in a free market system. Whos to say they wont use the unlimited money supply of the government to buy another 10%? 20%? Where does it stop? Whats to stop the government from prioritizing all investment and policy to favour intel at the expense of competitors since thst is in their interest now?

The cognitive dissonance surrounding this is insane. I guarantee if our government had done this first, anti-communist/conservative people would be self-immolating in protest of Comrade Carney.

Edit: clarity, forgot a point.
 
The government having a vote and stake is peak state capitalism. The cognitive dissonance surrounding this is insane. I guarantee if our government had done this first, people would be self-immolating in protest of Comrade Carney.
How many corporations does our government own, control, have a minority stake in, etc? Start counting here. Knock yourself out.
 
Back
Top