- Reaction score
- 7,685
- Points
- 1,260
The difference is indeed very stark.Since you need help, (you can't resist a chance to make a slight or belittle someone can you) here is a more detailed explanation to help you understand the root of the problems in both Canada and the US with respect to media and politics. This is another example that wrecks trust.
![]()
Jamie Sarkonak: The CBC's anti-Trump bias distorts Tylenol reporting
When scientists first raised the possibility of an autism link, CBC covered it without issue. Now that Trump's involved, it's a problemnationalpost.com
Jamie Sarkonak: The CBC's anti-Trump bias distorts Tylenol reporting
When scientists first raised the possibility of an autism link, CBC covered it without issue. Now that Trump's involved, it's a problem
The ongoing studies and coverage thereof are in response to scientific analysis of the case. That is quite normal, healthy, and ultimately leads to more informed outcomes. It is important for ideas to compete with each other, and in times past, it was considered to be a good thing to be able to see competing conclusions / outcomes play out publicly and transparently.
That is very different from the putative "leader of the free world" making a pronouncement that "don't take Tylenol". There is no transparency, no competition, no discussion. Just an edict.
Teddy Roosevelt spoke of the bully pulpit. He was using the word bully in its then vernacular sense - as in good or strong. He did not mean he had a pulpit from which to bully.
