To take a rhetorical question seriously, "No". It is not given to any person to decide "why" another person cast a vote, and the set of reasons is large.
I did not say faith; I said hope.
But any Canadian who considers "the US" a fiend is MAGA. That's an interesting position to take.
It certainly would be. I wonder who made that claim? Can you point me to them?
The USA is very different in a critical way - time. It is absurd to project a trend onto a few months and compare it to behaviours established over decades. You can bang your Chinese apologia drum as much as you want; I will continue to bang a different one.
A fair distinction.
Of course they did. Its the fundamental principle keeping US presidents from spending 100% of their time defending themselves against criminal charges. Questionable drone assassinations alone would suffice.
You mean like drone strikes against US citizens?
Bull. 44 previous presidents were not plagued and stymied in their duties by that threat. Trump’s experience was unique because his multiple crimes and the context thereof were unique. If such a sweeping executive privilege were required to allow the president to govern that would have become clear and been acted upon a century or more ago.
Presumably. There are plenty of other potential outrages that US courts would be competent to hear.
If the most resolute opponents of the president-of-the-day, whatever president, whatever day, believed they could tie him up in the courts, they would. Getting a president into court over a misuse of military force is a lot juicier than fraud or overwrought imaginings of revolution. A great many people are completely aware that the process is the punishment. 44 previous presidents served while a figurative fence still stood. Now it has been pushed down, and only the USSC stands in the way. "We've found the man; now we'll find a crime." It was foolish to essentially express that sentiment; it was foolish of everyone who heard it not to shun the speakers into oblivion. That shit will never go back into a horse.
Probably similar to when US citizen Anwar al-Awlaki was assassinated on order of President Obama.
Ever hear the maxim, don't fight a two front war?
And I'm SURE, given Temu's sterling customer service record, they'll look exactly like this ....
Who said anything about fighting? Just don’t go grovelling to a known hostile actor we’re on the outs with while our main partner is having a hissy fit.
I’m not getting wrapped around the axle on this. Most countries have considerable entry and often exit controls. Every state has absolute sovereign right to control its borders. They’re well within their rights to verify identity and admissibility of everyone coming in. We should be doing generally the same for every non-citizen.And I'm SURE, given Temu's sterling customer service record, they'll look exactly like this ....
Meanwhile, say "cheese."
U.S. to take photos of all travellers entering or leaving the country
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is amending its policies to require that all non-citizens — including Canadians — be photographed when entering or leaving the United States.www.thecanadianpressnews.ca
Meanwhile, say "cheese."
U.S. to take photos of all travellers entering or leaving the country
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is amending its policies to require that all non-citizens — including Canadians — be photographed when entering or leaving the United States.
