• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US Army: Transforming in Contact and Army 2030

FJAG

Army.ca Legend
Subscriber
Reaction score
18,546
Points
1,160
We don't seem to have a unified thread on discussions about the ongoing US Army transformation initiatives. Here's how they describe that.

Transforming in Contact is the Army's adaptation of its organizations and delivery of new technology into the hands of Soldiers so that they can experiment, innovate, and be ready to fight on a modern battlefield. It accelerates the fielding of necessary capabilities and leverages commercial-off-the-shelf products to get new capabilities to the force fast. Soldiers can organize and integrate the capabilities during realistic training scenarios, adapting their formations to fit the need and making technology work for them rather than working for the technology. This informs how we fight and how we organize in the future.

To start us off is this recent article about the army to shift a large portion of its attack helicopter fleet of AH64Es from the active army to the ARNG as well as other adjustments to their aviation fleet.


🍻
 
Autonomous launchers in three sizes. Based on one common pod that can carry various missiles.



1760800751074.jpeg
 
Back to the Mobile Brigade Combat Team and the correct use of the ISV.

Short form - not for advance to contact, recce leads.


Major problem - the need for a lightweight CUAS solution....

See the GBAD thread for the offered solutions to that problem.

Honeywell touted a pickup truck that could take out drones while moving at highway speeds.
 
Actually my comment about the advance to contact is overly glib and wrong.

The mounted advance to contact will end when recce drones make contact. The dismounted advance will continue.

And problems will ensue when the enemy learns how to defeat the drone screen by camouflage, deception, EW and CUAS.

Ambushes and meeting engagements will still happen.
 

Interesting, US Army stood down three Service Component Commands, FORSCOM, USASOUTHCOM, and USANORTHCOM that belonged to the US Army, US Southern Command, and US Northern Command respectively and created a USA Western Hemisphere Command in its place. A single four star hat for operations in the Americas. FORSCOM was essentially the "Army Force Generator" that owned I Corps, III Corps, and XVIII Airborne Corps and their respective divisions for allocation to COCOMs for operations.

This likely ties to the "Trump Corollary of the Munroe Doctrine" that the recently released US National Defense Strategy references in providing a single ground force employer for the US' new top priority, hemispheric defence.

Also interesting are the details, which highlight where the Corps (and most of the US Army's combat power) will be assigned. I Corps (7 ID, 25 ID, 11 Abn) will move to USARPAC under INDOPACOM while III Corps (1 Cav, 1 AD, 1 ID) will move to USAREUR-AF under EUCOM/AFRICOM. 4 ID will shift from III Corps to I Corps. XVIII Airborne Corps (82 Abn, 101 AA, 10 Mtn, 3 ID) will be assigned to USAWHC.

Although forces will be allocated to COCOMs as required, the Army has basically split its forces into three, and now has forces assigned to COCOMs on a permanent basis for operations.
 
Back
Top