- Reaction score
- 2,443
- Points
- 940
Apparently. :SeaKingTacco said::facepalm: Really? Is your sarcasm detector that broken?
I guess the " " was too subtle.
Apparently. :SeaKingTacco said::facepalm: Really? Is your sarcasm detector that broken?
beachdown said:Then there was these 2 cases
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2010/11/23/commanders_alleged_afghan_fling_could_lead_to_prison.html
Over a year after he was brought home from Haiti in disgrace, the Military Grievances External Review Committee ruled his removal was unjustified and said it was aghast at the way he was treated.
Journeyman said:I guess the " " was too subtle.
RecceO said:Col Ouellette was wrongly removed from his position, see here-
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/military-grievance-ouellette-1.3685968
"Nobody has heard what I have had to say, and nobody in the chain of command really cared about the way [my case] has been handled," Ouellette told CBC News in an interview.
"I would just like someone to say they are sorry."
beachdown said:Most states in the US have a "no fault divorce" rule, so cheating / adultery is a moot point.
Old Sweat said:Thanks. That certainly sends a message.
A demotion of three grades is unusual, and is based on Army regulations that require a three-member board to determine an officer's retirement rank when the person has been found guilty of misconduct. The board had to decide whether Haight served satisfactorily in his current rank, and if not, he could be demoted to the last rank in which his service would be considered satisfactory.
The demotion suggests that the board concluded that Haight's misconduct stretched back through his time as colonel and was serious enough to make retirement at the more senior grades not possible.
Under the regulations, "one specific act of misconduct may or may not form the basis for a determination that the overall service in that grade was unsatisfactory, regardless of the period of time served in grade."