• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US national intelligence up some 70% in ten years

MarkOttawa

Army.ca Fixture
Inactive
Fallen Comrade
Reaction score
147
Points
710
The figure has not been made public for quite some time:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/29/AR2007102902062.html

The director of national intelligence will disclose today that national intelligence activities amounting to roughly 80 percent of all U.S. intelligence spending for the year cost more than $40 billion, according to sources on Capitol Hill and inside the administration.

The disclosure means that when military spending is added, aggregate U.S. intelligence spending for fiscal 2007 exceeded $50 billion, according to these sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the total remains classified.

Adm. Mike McConnell will announce that the fiscal 2007 national intelligence program figure, classified up to now, is being made public at the urging of the Sept. 11 commission and the insistence of Congress, which turned the commission's recommendation into law. The commission's plan was to have the president make the figure public each year.

While the budget figure released by McConnell excludes intelligence programs for the separate military services, it includes the budgets of the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the FBI's intelligence programs, the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research and the major Defense Department intelligence collection agencies.

The latter group includes the National Security Agency, which intercepts electronic communications; the National Reconnaissance Office, which builds and manages intelligence satellites; and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which does image collection. They compose a major part of the $40 billion-plus national intelligence budget.

In October 1997, then-CIA Director George J. Tenet disclosed that $26.6 billion was the aggregate amount appropriated for intelligence and intelligence-related activities for fiscal year 1997. He said he saw no harm to national security in such a disclosure...

At a public meeting in 2005, Mary Margaret Graham, the deputy director of national intelligence for collection, said the annual intelligence budget was $44 billion, including the budget for the military services. The figure was never officially confirmed...

Anybody got an idea what the comparable increase for Canada would be (CSIS, CSE, RCMP, maybe CBSA etc.)?

Mark
Ottawa

 
AFAIK, I dont think any documents for intelligence expenditures for those organizations are available on the net for public viewing...
 
The 70% over ten years works out to a 5.5% annual increase. Not much more than inflation depending on the year.
 
DBA said:
The 70% over ten years works out to a 5.5% annual increase. Not much more than inflation depending on the year.

Hah, good one.

"Intelligence Inflation" - can we get that indexed?
 
Greymatters: The CSIS budget (2006)
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rpp/0607/psepc-sppcc/psepc-sppcc01_e.asp

2006-2007
$346.1M

2007-2008
$345.3M

2008-2009
$352.0M

To which has been added at this year's budget:
http://www.budget.gc.ca/2007/bp/bpc6e.html

2007-2008
$21M

2008-2009
$60M 

And this might be CSE's 2006-2007 budget:
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rpp/0607/ND-DN/ND-DN03_e.asp

"Communications Security "
"Generate and sustain relevant, responsive and effective combat capable, integrated forces"
$5,964M

"Conduct operations"
$225,051M

Mark
Ottawa
;)
 
MarkOttawa said:
Greymatters: The CSIS budget (2006)
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rpp/0607/psepc-sppcc/psepc-sppcc01_e.asp

Nice one, I didnt look there...
 
Greymatters: CSE even gives its personnel strength:
http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/media-room/cse-overview-e.html

...CSE depends on an elite workforce of some 1350 personnel drawn from a variety of disciplines and backgrounds. These include engineers, computer scientists and programmer-developers responsible for creating sophisticated hardware and software systems. Physicists and mathematicians contribute toward technically challenging research, development and cryptographic tasks, while language specialists and intelligence analysts transform the raw information collected into high-quality, often actionable products for CSE's clients...

Couldn't find an official figure for CSIS but if one Googled hard enough...

RCMP budget and personnel for non-criminal intelligence/CT are for me impossible to break out from their various expenditure categories.  See "Strategic Priority: Terrorism – Ongoing" here:
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rpp/0708/rcmp-grc/rcmp-grc02_e.asp

Mark
Ottawa


 
Mark, looks like I didnt try very hard on my original search, you found all the docs on this...

I can add one piece about employees at CSIS.  Took me a while to remember where I had it, but I did recall this gem from an unusual source that talks about CSIS employees...

http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/search/view_html.asp?doid=277&isruling=1&lg=_e
[94] (---) the Director General of Personnel Services, testified at the hearing on behalf of the Respondent. ... . CSIS is an organization consisting of approximately 2000 employees, a third of whom would be intelligence officers....

This why I had saved it - First I'd heard of that these two medals were awarded based on 'intelligence work'...
In 1977 he was presented with the Queen's Jubilee Medal for intelligence work and in 1992 he was awarded the 125th Confederation Medal for intelligence-related work.


 
Greymatters,

Yeah, the budget and personnel strength of the Service has always been open information.  It gets reported in the press occasionally, but no one really pays attention.

As to the Queen's Jubilee Medal and the 125th Confederation Anniversary Medal, well, the criteria was the same as for other government agencies.  A fixed number is awarded to each organization.  After senior management has taken received theirs, the rest are allocated throughout amongst the proletariat.  A citation is awarded saying for distinguished service, etc, but no one (I hope) has ever believed it was a personal award for their own exploits.  Then again, if I was suing the Service I probably would have done the exact same thing.  Hmmmm, suing the Service.  Why didn't I think of that before!

Dan.
 
exspy said:
Yeah, the budget and personnel strength of the Service has always been open information.  It gets reported in the press occasionally, but no one really pays attention. 

True, but not always easy to find! 
 
Back
Top