• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US Presidential Election 2024 - Trump vs Harris - Vote Hard with a Vengence

Status
Not open for further replies.

The new pick for SECDEF also questions women in combat units. I’m sure that will go just fine.

And some of us here are around the Major rank and have been in combat. I’m not sure that puts us anywhere near the ballpark of having the experience to become SECDEF, especially when there was a retired LGen in the running.
 
Isn't she the one that lied about being native or some such thing?
The one and only 😄


The new pick for SECDEF also questions women in combat units. I’m sure that will go just fine.

And some of us here are around the Major rank and have been in combat. I’m not sure that puts us anywhere near the ballpark of having the experience to become SECDEF, especially when there was a retired LGen in the running.
I'd vote you for SECDEF

I like the pick solely because he isn't from the establishment. Also has a MPP from Harvard which is nothing to sniff your nose at.

Most of all, he left his $8 million a year job at FOX to become SecDef for $246,000 a year.
 
I'd vote you for SECDEF
Sure, but no one voted for him to be SECDEF.

I like the pick solely because he isn't from the establishment. Also has a MPP from Harvard which is nothing to sniff your nose at.
“Not from the Estalishment” and “MPP from Harvard” seem at odds with each other.

Most of all, he left his $8 million a year job at FOX to become SecDef for $246,000 a year.
1. The pay drop is definitely something to take into consideration, but the influence as SECDEF is a tad more than a talking head at Fox.
2. I said this in a parallel thread but he hasn’t done anything yet. He is the nominee to be SECDEF, like everyone else who is a nominee for their cabinet posts. The Senate needs to assent to it (one of those “checks and balances” things) which is not a sure thing. It’s a GOP senate so it’s more sure, but not 100%.
 
Sure, but no one voted for him to be SECDEF.


“Not from the Estalishment” and “MPP from Harvard” seem at odds with each other.


1. The pay drop is definitely something to take into consideration, but the influence as SECDEF is a tad more than a talking head at Fox.
2. I said this in a parallel thread but he hasn’t done anything yet. He is the nominee to be SECDEF, like everyone else who is a nominee for their cabinet posts. The Senate needs to assent to it (one of those “checks and balances” things) which is not a sure thing. It’s a GOP senate so it’s more sure, but not 100%.
Had a senate ever not confirmed a nominee from a president from their own party when they control the senate? Senators with their 6 year terms may feel more secure in "not" cow towing to trump, so is it possible a few reoublican senators say "this guy isn't qualified" and vote against it?
 
Had a senate ever not confirmed a nominee from a president from their own party when they control the senate? Senators with their 6 year terms may feel more secure in "not" cow towing to trump, so is it possible a few reoublican senators say "this guy isn't qualified" and vote against it?
He’ll get confirmed. But a lot of questions can get asked that lead to inside parts being said outside.

My understanding though is Trump is trying to find a way to get them confirmed without the normal process.
 
My understanding though is Trump is trying to find a way to get them confirmed without the normal process.
That's my understanding, too.
 
Oh great, another snobby elitist academic who think they are smarter than everyone else making decisions!
How is he an academic?

Going to University and receiving an education doesn't make you an academic. Besides weren’t you the one supposedly professing the virtues of higher education to everyone? 😉

Sure, but no one voted for him to be SECDEF.


“Not from the Estalishment” and “MPP from Harvard” seem at odds with each other.
Just because you attend an elite school doesn't make you part of the establishment.

The establishment refers to "the Washington Establishment" the agglomeration of Democrat & Republican elites, along with the Bureaucrats who support them.

It's a political term for a select group of people. We also have an establishment in Canada.
1. The pay drop is definitely something to take into consideration, but the influence as SECDEF is a tad more than a talking head at Fox.
2. I said this in a parallel thread but he hasn’t done anything yet. He is the nominee to be SECDEF, like everyone else who is a nominee for their cabinet posts. The Senate needs to assent to it (one of those “checks and balances” things) which is not a sure thing. It’s a GOP senate so it’s more sure, but not 100%.

I believe you and @brihard asked what exactly his qualifications were? I laid them out.

Highly educated
Lobbying experience
Worked in Finance and at Reputable Think Tanks
Political Pundit
Authored 4 books
Multi-Millionaire

Found the time while doing all of this to join the National Guard and do a bunch of combat tours and was also decorated (I have read one of his Bronze Stars from his time in Iraq has a big old "V" beside it).

Oh forgot to mention that he was also an All-Star Basketball Player, set the Minnesota High School Record for 3-point shots and played Div 1 Ball at Princeton and played in the NCAA March Madness Tourney in 2001.

The guy has a very impressive CV.
 
Just because you attend an elite school doesn't make you part of the establishment.

The establishment refers to "the Washington Establishment" the agglomeration of Democrat & Republican elites, along with the Bureaucrats who support them.

It's a political term for a select group of people. We also have an establishment in Canada.
Its called 'The Swamp.' 😉


No surprises here. Those that think Trump has no business as POTUS, will spend the next four years questioning and opining on what they consider shit choices by him. Watch what the dems complain about and you'll see it become a topic of concern here, replete with quotes from the MSM and talking points from bitter democrats. It'll be no different, here, than the last time he was POTUS.
 
Last edited:
If the Senate won’t confirm his appointment, the President can just appoint him as “acting”. That’s how Trump got around those pesky confirmation hearings last time.

The fact he advocates for the pardoning of convicted war criminals, including ones turned in by his own troops, should be disqualifying.
 
If the Senate won’t confirm his appointment, the President can just appoint him as “acting”. That’s how Trump got around those pesky confirmation hearings last time.

The fact he advocates for the pardoning of convicted war criminals, including ones turned in by his own troops, should be disqualifying.
There’s already talk that he’s just going to be the face of this and the White House will be pulling most of strings.
 
How is he an academic?

Going to University and receiving an education doesn't make you an academic. Besides weren’t you the one supposedly professing the virtues of higher education to everyone? 😉
Poor attempt at being glib on my part, I'll admit. And this wasn't actually directed at you. It was directed at those on this site who have demonstrated considerable disdain for the idea of a post secondary education, saying as much that having such an education at best provides no benefit, and at worst causes you to become a woke idiot.
 
There’s already talk that he’s just going to be the face of this and the White House will be pulling most of strings.
Just listened to Ham and Keyes speak about appointments, including Hegseth, on Vassy's show. Nowhere did I hear them say he'd just be the face and that the WH would pull the strings. They talked about his inexperience and name recognition.

Every portfolio in a Presidents staff is controlled by the WH. Their job is to carry out the Presidents agenda. Just like ours is to support the Commander and their plan. That does not mean they are 'empty suits' any more than we are.

I'll throw in, just for shiggles, that these are just CTV commentators, part of trudeau's bribed media.

Lastly, if someone doesn't like Trump, they are more than likely to transfer that dislike to, and talk down, his appointments also. Doesn't mean they are right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top