• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Watch The Largest Bridge Explosion In Texas History In Glorious Slow Motion

cupper

Army.ca Veteran
Inactive
Reaction score
4
Points
430
This is  8) to watch.

(Mods, we need a "Blowing Stuff Up" sub forum.  :nod: )

http://jalopnik.com/watch-the-largest-bridge-explosion-in-texas-history-in-455748993

And alternate view of the same demo.

http://gizmodo.com/5991085/your-monday-morning-explosion-fix-watch-this-bridge-blow-up-in-glorious-slow-motion
 
Best. Video. Ever.... even made a small drop of awesome leak out of the corner of my eye.
 
Colin P said:
The det cord burn was interesting to watch.

Det cord does not burn!  ;D

What you are seeing is the explosive train of the detonating wave as it propagates down the detonating cord...
 
It's called detonating cord, not exploding cord, for a reason.  :salute:
 
It doesn't burn. It detonates.  That could be the reason it is not called Fuse Instantaneous Burning (FIB).
 
Or M700 Safety Fuse aka Time fuse which does burn at a rate 118-144 s/m

George Wallace said:
It doesn't burn. It detonates.  That could be the reason it is not called Fuse Instantaneous Burning (FIB).

The correct term is actually FBI - Fuse blasting instantaneous...... and "burns" at 33.5 m/s....

 
NFLD Sapper said:
Or M700 Safety Fuse aka Time fuse which does burn at a rate 118-144 s/m

The correct term is actually FBI - Fuse blasting instantaneous...... and "burns" at 33.5 m/s....

It was FIB when I played with it, way back when.....but then I qualified CLC prior to its many changes over the decades to become the PLQ.  I really hate those guys who change the names of everything to get that box checked on their PER..... ;D
 
Actually both are going on at the same time. The shock wave starts the exothermic reaction, which then supports the shock wave as it travels

All from Wiki

"Detonation wave
Main article: Detonation

    A detonation wave is essentially a shock supported by a trailing exothermic reaction. It involves a wave traveling through a highly combustible or chemically unstable medium, such as an oxygen-methane mixture or a high explosive. The chemical reaction of the medium occurs following the shock wave, and the chemical energy of the reaction drives the wave forward.
    A detonation wave follows slightly different rules from an ordinary shock since it is driven by the chemical reaction occurring behind the shock wave front. In the simplest theory for detonations, an unsupported, self-propagating detonation wave proceeds at the Chapman-Jouguet velocity. A detonation will also cause a shock of type 1, above to propagate into the surrounding air due to the overpressure induced by the explosion.
    When a shockwave is created by high explosives such as TNT (which has a detonation velocity of 6,900 m/s), it will always travel at high, supersonic velocity from its point of origin"


"An exothermic reaction is a chemical or physical reaction that is done by the release of heat. It gives out energy to its surroundings. The energy needed for the reaction to occur is less than the total energy released."

"burning is the sequence of exothermic chemical reactions between a fuel and an oxidant accompanied by the production of heat and conversion of chemical species."



 
George Wallace said:
It was FIB when I played with it, way back when.....but then I qualified CLC prior to its many changes over the decades to become the PLQ.  I really hate those guys who change the names of everything to get that box checked on their PER..... ;D

That is something we where trying to find out...no one knows who or when someone changed the name...at least since 95 its been FBI as indicated in B-GL-320-009-FP-001 - Demolitions Part 1 and I think in the latest rewrite it is still FBI
 
Colin P don't tell me how explosives work  ;D

We don't consider it to be "burning" because it is an instantaneous reaction
 
NFLD Sapper said:
That is something we where trying to find out...no one knows who or when someone changed the name...at least since 95 its been FBI as indicated in B-GL-320-009-FP-001 - Demolitions Part 1 and I think in the latest rewrite it is still FBI

This constant changing of names does nothing but keep the troops confused.  I had a tasking at the Infantry School and while filling out the inclearance forms as to what my qualifications were, I left most of them unchecked.....and that included PLQ....If I didn't know what it was, I guessed that I was not qualified.  One of these days, this BS will get someone seriously injured or killed.
 
Bruce Monkhouse said:
How about that bridge?? ::)
Yeah, sort of Monty Python "laden and unladen, Swallow" thing starting to build.  Anyone else have more excellent bridge un-building footage out there?
 
NFLD Sapper said:
That is something we where trying to find out...no one knows who or when someone changed the name...at least since 95 its been FBI as indicated in B-GL-320-009-FP-001 - Demolitions Part 1 and I think in the latest rewrite it is still FBI

George is correct....

I started out in the days when FIB was still around...similar to safety fuse but burned (not detonated) at a very fast rate....can't remember the rate. It was orange brown in colour.

If I was back in NB...I could tell you as I still have my original course notes and wot not...Back in those days...we had to take meticulous notes and drawings...which were checked by course staff.

The main use for FIB was in explosive booby trap construction.  We also used a lot for Bat-Sim.

Back in the days when we still used gun cotton primers, time pencils and 808!!  And lovely bits of kit like the EDC (exploder dynamo condenser). 

How far back...still teaching and using much of that lot along with new explosives and explosive accessories in the 70s and 80s.
 
NFLD Sapper said:
Colin P don't tell me how explosives work  ;D

We don't consider it to be "burning" because it is an instantaneous reaction

You might not, but you and the "We's" would be wrong.  The reaction of FIB, FBI or FI, although rapid is achieved by burning.

On that note.....What would you call deflagration?

An instantaneous reaction....achieved by rapid (instantaneous/sub-sonic) burning...?  Hope so!

Low explosives of course burn....Low explosives, and certain other compounds, liquids and gases can transition to detonation if the conditions are right.

High explosives detonate...except when we are trying to get them to deflagrate.... i.e. case entry and rapid burning (consumption) of the filling of an air dropped bomb in a single step achieved with a special high explosive charge.

Not trying to tell a CFSME instructor with 13+ years of reserve experience - a good chunk it seems on CFSME contracts how explosives work of course  ;D
 
All I care about is that it blowed up real gooood! ;D

It's the one aspect of my military career I regret not pursuing further. On my JLC / CLC they allowed several of us to set up basic demo charges to act as a simulated arty barrage for the ISCC course were were partnered up with. Fun times.

It's knowledge applicable in my current career as a structural engineer. Unfortunately they only taught explosive engineering as part of the chemical engineers carricula, with the mining engineers having some courses as well.
 
Back
Top